Re: [gentoo-dev] Network configuration and bash

2007-02-09 Thread Jakub Moc
Mike Frysinger napsal(a): On Thursday 08 February 2007, Roy Marples wrote: The actual scripts themselves can be re-worked if they need to be - this problem only when the arrays are used in config files. i guess my point was i think we really need to be consistent here ... either arrays are

Re: [gentoo-dev] Network configuration and bash

2007-02-09 Thread Georgi Georgiev
Quoting Roy Marples [EMAIL PROTECTED]: FreeBSD sh + Gentoo baselayout = cold boot in around 4 seconds Going to multi-user from single user after a boot is under 2 seconds (times measured from when init starts rc - the difference is probably because the all my local mounts are still mounted) I

Re: [gentoo-dev] New network config for baselayout-ng

2007-02-09 Thread Donnie Berkholz
Mike Frysinger wrote: On Wednesday 07 February 2007, Roy Marples wrote: We still need something that is array like for want of a better phrase, so how about delimiting using ; like so config_eth0=10.1.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0; 10.1.1.2/24 if you want to allow one liners, then i dont see

Re: [gentoo-dev] Network configuration and bash

2007-02-09 Thread Donnie Berkholz
Jakub Moc wrote: Mike Frysinger napsal(a): On Thursday 08 February 2007, Roy Marples wrote: The actual scripts themselves can be re-worked if they need to be - this problem only when the arrays are used in config files. i guess my point was i think we really need to be consistent here ...

Re: [gentoo-dev] Network configuration and bash

2007-02-09 Thread Roy Marples
On Fri, 09 Feb 2007 01:03:04 -0800 Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jakub Moc wrote: Mike Frysinger napsal(a): On Thursday 08 February 2007, Roy Marples wrote: The actual scripts themselves can be re-worked if they need to be - this problem only when the arrays are used in config

Re: [gentoo-dev] Network configuration and bash

2007-02-09 Thread Roy Marples
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 20:27:06 -0500 Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday 08 February 2007, Ned Ludd wrote: Please read over what's been talked about elsewhere in this thread. He is not trying to break existing functionality at all. Only extend it to be posix aware

Re: [gentoo-dev] Network configuration and bash

2007-02-09 Thread Roy Marples
On Fri, 09 Feb 2007 17:27:58 +0900 Georgi Georgiev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting Roy Marples [EMAIL PROTECTED]: FreeBSD sh + Gentoo baselayout = cold boot in around 4 seconds Going to multi-user from single user after a boot is under 2 seconds (times measured from when init starts rc

Re: [gentoo-dev] New network config for baselayout-ng

2007-02-09 Thread Roy Marples
On Fri, 9 Feb 2007 02:07:50 -0500 Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wednesday 07 February 2007, Kevin F. Quinn wrote: Another idea; have baselayout install different versions of init.d/conf.d and default shell for runscript depending on USE flags that'll just lead to horrible bit

Re: [gentoo-dev] Network configuration and bash

2007-02-09 Thread Harald van Dijk
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 09:29:04AM +, Roy Marples wrote: On Fri, 09 Feb 2007 01:03:04 -0800 Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jakub Moc wrote: Mike Frysinger napsal(a): On Thursday 08 February 2007, Roy Marples wrote: The actual scripts themselves can be re-worked if they

Re: [gentoo-dev] Network configuration and bash

2007-02-09 Thread Roy Marples
On Fri, 9 Feb 2007 10:51:29 +0100 Harald van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That works with your ; approach too, as well as with the newline-separated approach: replace= 4d 1280 768 24 5c 1400 1050 16 IFS='; ' #set -f set -- ${replace} #set +f unset IFS for x ; do

Re: [gentoo-dev] Network configuration and bash

2007-02-09 Thread Roy Marples
On Fri, 9 Feb 2007 12:05:52 +0100 Harald van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: One issue is that any valid character is allowed in WPAPSK, including ; Good point, but excluding newline, right? I can't try it, but rt2500's own settings file format does not allow for newline in WPAPSK. No it

Re: [gentoo-dev] Network configuration and bash

2007-02-09 Thread Harald van Dijk
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 11:49:05AM +, Roy Marples wrote: On Fri, 9 Feb 2007 12:05:52 +0100 Harald van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: One issue is that any valid character is allowed in WPAPSK, including ; Good point, but excluding newline, right? I can't try it, but rt2500's own

Re: [gentoo-dev] New network config for baselayout-ng

2007-02-09 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 02:10 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Thursday 08 February 2007, Chris Gianelloni wrote: He's not screwing up anything. He's making changes he wishes as the author and maintainer of the package. If someone doesn't like it, they can fork it and maintain their own

[gentoo-dev] Re: Network configuration and bash

2007-02-09 Thread David Leverton
Roy Marples wrote: On Fri, 09 Feb 2007 01:03:04 -0800 Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How about this? replace= '4d 1280 768 24' '5c 1400 1050 16' Actually, that may work better than my delimited with ; approach. We could then do eval set -- ${replace} for x in $@

[gentoo-dev] www-servers/yaws needs a new maintainer

2007-02-09 Thread Raphael Marichez
Hi, www-servers/yaws is without an ebuild maintainer and has an open security bug #159602 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159602 Anyone willing to take care of this package in the future, please update metadata.xml and CC yourself on the bug. -- Raphael Marichez aka Falco

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Network configuration and bash

2007-02-09 Thread Roy Marples
On Fri, 09 Feb 2007 14:16:25 + David Leverton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Would something like the following be acceptable? If the user uses bash they can use an array, otherwise (or if they prefer) they can do the '...' '...' thing, transparently to the code that uses the variable. Could do

[gentoo-dev] Last rites for dev-java/jess-bin

2007-02-09 Thread Petteri Räty
A commercial package that was maintained by zx who has not been active for quite a while now. http://cia.navi.cx/stats/author/zx The package is one major version behind and is still using Manifest1 so removing is needed to get a Manifest2 only tree. Someone from the java team please step up or

Re: [gentoo-dev] New network config for baselayout-ng

2007-02-09 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Friday 09 February 2007, Chris Gianelloni wrote: On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 02:10 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: that really isnt a valid stance to take with the package in question ... by this logic, i can turn around and screw with the toolchain and if no one likes what i'm doing, then that's

[gentoo-dev] punt raidtools and move people to mdadm

2007-02-09 Thread Mike Frysinger
anyone have a compelling reason for keeping raidtools anymore ? the mdadm package replaces all the functionality of raidtools and is actively maintained upstream ive kept it around mostly so people can transition to mdadm nicely but i think it's about time we let it go -mike

Re: [gentoo-dev] New network config for baselayout-ng

2007-02-09 Thread Daniel Robbins
On 2/9/07, Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: forking the package is retarded. maintain backward compability and there's no reason to fork it. baselayout isnt Roy's package, it isnt my package, it isnt anyone's. it belongs to Gentoo as a whole which means changes to it affect everyone in

Re: [gentoo-dev] New network config for baselayout-ng

2007-02-09 Thread Thomas Rösner
Daniel Robbins schrieb: Structured this way, fastlayout is certainly a project that sounds like a great idea, and would I enjoy working on in some capacity - I have some ideas about this. I also think it would be a good idea to check out what other distributions are doing in this area.

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Default Phase Hooks

2007-02-09 Thread Ed Catmur
On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 06:51 +, Alec Warner wrote: In order to facilitate better ease of use with phase hooks, I propose a paludis-style default phase hook. Basically ebuild.sh provides a default hook that looks in PORTAGE_HOOKS_DIR/{pre,post}_${EBUILD_PHASE}/ for shell scripts and