On 7/19/07, Caleb Cushing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
another option could just be to enable the protocols in the ebuild by
default (or does that have to be done globally in profile?) and force users
to turn them off if they don't want them.
Yeah that would have to be done in the profile. We co
another option could just be to enable the protocols in the ebuild by
default (or does that have to be done globally in profile?) and force users
to turn them off if they don't want them.
On 7/19/07, Eric Polino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Would it be possible to have all the protocols for net-i
Would it be possible to have all the protocols for net-im/pidgin
turned on by default. We often get people coming to #pidgin looking
for help as to why they can't get MSN or some other protocol working.
It most often is because they haven't enabled the given protocol USE
flag.
There is nothing g
Petteri Räty wrote:
> Your doc zombie Sven Vermeulen has risen from his grave and is back to
> beat www.gentoo.org/doc/en with his fingers. Give him the usual welcome
> with nice head shots.
Hi SwifTy. See you 'round our channel!
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 7/18/07, Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Your doc zombie Sven Vermeulen has risen from his grave and is back to
beat www.gentoo.org/doc/en with his fingers. Give him the usual welcome
with nice head shots.
Welcome back Sven!
Btw, you should be nominated for Council because of bug #2
Petteri Räty wrote:
> Your doc zombie Sven Vermeulen has risen from his grave and is back to
> beat www.gentoo.org/doc/en with his fingers. Give him the usual welcome
> with nice head shots.
Welcome back, Sven :)
Kind Regards,
--
Dimitry Bradt - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo/Linux Developer
--
sig
Il Wednesday 18 July 2007 23:22:56 Petteri Räty ha scritto:
> Your doc zombie Sven Vermeulen has risen from his grave and is back to
> beat www.gentoo.org/doc/en with his fingers. Give him the usual welcome
> with nice head shots.
>
> Regards,
> Petteri
>
> PS. I tried but couldn't get myself subsc
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 02:20:46PM -0400, Richard Freeman wrote:
> :0 Wh: msgid.lock
> | formail -D 8192 msgid.cache
> :0 a:
> /dev/null
I'd advise against this bit of procmail hackery.
I used to use it, until I ran into some MUAs that did not generate sane
message-ids (Lotus Notes, certain versio
On Wednesday 18 July 2007, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 19:47 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > historically, gcc on x86 has always defaulted to i386. some people
> > noticed recently that glibc-2.6 fails to build in this situation as they
> > were only setting -mtune via CFLAGS,
Your doc zombie Sven Vermeulen has risen from his grave and is back to
beat www.gentoo.org/doc/en with his fingers. Give him the usual welcome
with nice head shots.
Regards,
Petteri
PS. I tried but couldn't get myself subscribed to -dev-announce yet but
maybe before the next one :)
signature.a
* Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> So, let's hear some reasons why I as a Gentoo developer should vote for
> you. And here's a hint, be more forward looking then the current 100+
> post threads on the -dev ML. Let's hear your {2,3,5} year plan for Gentoo.
Sounds good.
> For the sake of every
All,
You've all stated that you accept or don't accept (but this is targeted
at the acceptors, sorry non-acceptors) but the people that accept
haven't really given much reason as to why they would be a good
candidate. In fact many of the nominations don't even have that
information attached. Becau
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 19:47 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> historically, gcc on x86 has always defaulted to i386. some people noticed
> recently that glibc-2.6 fails to build in this situation as they were only
> setting -mtune via CFLAGS, not -march. i'll be tweaking gcc so that it will
> def
# Samuli Suominen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (18 Jul 2007)
# Masked for treecleaners bug 185386. Unfetchable package,
# homepage is unavailable and for using GTK+-1.2.
# Removed in 60 days.
media-libs/janus
It actually redirects you to Disney travel agency pages from homepage.
*g*
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joe Peterson wrote:
> I suspect
> "not" is the way it was set up, since clearly all posts to the new
> -dev-announce will not be technical, and so they should not be relayed
> to -dev automatically. Anyone know?
>
I like the idea of auto-crosspostin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Duncan wrote:
>
> According to the bug on -project (which I was CCed to), both it and dev-
> announce have been created.
>
> New developers are announcements. The primary announcement should
> therefore go to dev-announce, x-posted to dev, with fol
Duncan wrote:
> Philip Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted:
>> To this user since 2003, who plans to install Gentoo in the new machine
>> which I am presently designing, this sounds like a very welcome
>> development. I shall continue to subscribe to -dev , but not to
>> -project. Should I also subscri
Philip Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Tue, 17 Jul 2007
23:28:57 -0400:
> To this user since 2003, who plans to install Gentoo in the new machine
> which I am presently designing, this sounds like a very welcome
> development. I shall continue to subscribe t
Kumba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
below, on Tue, 17 Jul 2007 09:50:26 -0400:
> George Prowse wrote:
>>
>> So that would mean that welcoming new developers would be on the
>> -project list?
>
> My thinking, I think they would fit better over there, since it is
> somewh
Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> Peter Gordon wrote:
>> On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 19:47 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> historically, gcc on x86 has always defaulted to i386. some people noticed
>>> recently that glibc-2.6 fails to build in this situation as they were only
>>> setting -mtune via CFLAGS, no
On Wednesday 18 July 2007, Peter Gordon wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 19:47 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > historically, gcc on x86 has always defaulted to i386. some people
> > noticed recently that glibc-2.6 fails to build in this situation as they
> > were only setting -mtune via CFLAGS, not
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 22:52 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> i dont think he'll accept, but i dont see Flameeyes name yet ...
Fine then, I nominate the biggest flamer of them all, Flameeyes :)
PS
You have to accept, blood in blood out ;)
--
William L. Thomson Jr.
Gentoo/Java
signature.asc
Descr
Peter Gordon wrote:
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 19:47 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
historically, gcc on x86 has always defaulted to i386. some people noticed
recently that glibc-2.6 fails to build in this situation as they were only
setting -mtune via CFLAGS, not -march. i'll be tweaking gcc so tha
Hi!
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> historically, gcc on x86 has always defaulted to i386. some people noticed
> recently that glibc-2.6 fails to build in this situation as they were only
> setting -mtune via CFLAGS, not -march. i'll be tweaking gcc so that it will
> default -ma
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2007, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Hrm, I don't see any warnings for the emacs overlay [...]
> Usually when people get errors with an overlay it's because of a
> missing profiles/repo_name file, which isn't the case here.
It might well be the reason since the comment on LWN is f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter Gordon wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 19:47 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> historically, gcc on x86 has always defaulted to i386. some people noticed
>> recently that glibc-2.6 fails to build in this situation as they were only
>> setting -mt
I think it's the other way arround. -march=ix86 is implicit unless you
override it with a user variable.
On 7/18/07, Peter Gordon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 19:47 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> historically, gcc on x86 has always defaulted to i386. some people noticed
> re
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 19:47 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> historically, gcc on x86 has always defaulted to i386. some people noticed
> recently that glibc-2.6 fails to build in this situation as they were only
> setting -mtune via CFLAGS, not -march. i'll be tweaking gcc so that it will
> def
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 21:31:50 +0200
Christian Faulhammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just read Donnie's nice article [1] and went through the comments.
> One saying
>
> "After switching to paludis, I installed layman, and used it to
> kick-start some of the overlays.gentoo.org stuff. Paludis exp
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> i dont think he'll accept, but i dont see Flameeyes name yet ...
> -mike
+1
--
Luca Barbato
Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
30 matches
Mail list logo
