So this is now the third revision of this proposal.
The first two editions are available here.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/48485
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/49601
Comments are welcome, as are offers to implement it.
Implementations should be a small
On 19:33 Thu 05 Jun , Roy Bamford wrote:
I don't want to nominate anyone who hasn't been nominated already.
I would like to address all the candidates who have or will accept
council nominations.
I just got to this because I was on vacation and I've been busy getting
work done since I
Mart Raudsepp [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Tue, 01 Jul 2008
05:05:51 +0300:
Over a year or two ago, it was communicated that it supposedly a policy
that USE=static should only control if a package installs static
libraries INSTEAD of shared libraries, and
On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 14:10 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 21:42:49 +0300
Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike Frysinger kirjoitti:
imo -Wl,-O1 should go into base
-mike
So seems like we should just do it (tm).
Why not default/linux?
Just wanted to ask the
This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically
the 2nd Thursday at 2000 UTC / 1600 EST), same bat channel
(#gentoo-council @ irc.freenode.net) !
If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
Duncan a écrit :
Probably others than GNOME, too.
Thus Mart's effort to bring it to gentoo-dev :)
This is the ticklish bit, but there's still a way around it for users
(such as those trying to fit GNOME on a liveCD) that need it. Useing
portage's bashrc, setup a conditional that excepts
Gilles Dartiguelongue a écrit :
Le lundi 30 juin 2008 à 13:33 -0700, Donnie Berkholz a écrit :
On 22:04 Mon 30 Jun , Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
PS: I'd like to remind users reading here that assigning bugs directly
is _bad_ if you didn't perform the above checks. It is _not_ ok to
assign
On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 05:30 +, Mike Frysinger wrote:
This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically
the 2nd Thursday at 2000 UTC / 1600 EST), same bat channel
(#gentoo-council @ irc.freenode.net) !
If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
Robin H. Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
So this is now the third revision of this proposal.
The first two editions are available here.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/48485
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/49601
Comments are welcome, as are offers to
Here's the updated version of my proposition:
default/linux: LDFLAGS=-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common
default/linux/mips: LDFLAGS=-Wl,-O1,--sort-common
hardened/linux: LDFLAGS=-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common
uclibc: LDFLAGS=-Wl,-O1,--sort-common
--
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar
Mark Loeser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Its a good idea, but since our users don't
always provide useful reports, it seems like we are just shifting work
around.
I'd suggest that this would /spread/ work around - Instead of a few
folks wrangling bugs, everyone would be doing it.
That said, I
* Gilles Dartiguelongue [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Le lundi 30 juin 2008 à 19:01 +0200, Enrico Weigelt a écrit :
big_snip
Funny, how you all manage to make simple things complicated ;-o
I guess nobody considered an trivial solutions like an useflag ...
no, this is not the proper
Hi,
snip
I'm really curious to know why a new (global) useflag couldn't
do the trick.
Let's say, we introduce a new useflag called static-libs and
enable it by defaulin all profiles. Then we can have a look at
the lib packages step by step and add support when it seems
useful there and test
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 2:47 PM, Enrico Weigelt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, some of you might still remember what I said about gtk and
slots long time ago. Just to summarize my point:
* the use of slots should be MINIMIZED. IMHO, the kernel is one
of the few valid uses, gtk is NOT (1.*
Albert Zeyer kirjoitti:
On Sat, 2008-06-21 at 09:35 +0200, Tiziano Müller wrote:
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 14:52 Thu 05 Jun , Samuli Suominen wrote:
# Samuli Suominen [EMAIL PROTECTED] (05 Jun 2008)
# Masked for removal in ~30 days by treecleaners.
# Replaced by USE libffi in
After a kernel update, sys-kernel/module-rebuild can be used to rebuild the
installed external kernel modules.
Software like dev-libs/klibc or app-cdr/cdrtools are linked against the kernel
sources and not against the kernel headers. Is it other programs like them in
the tree?
I am not a gentoo
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
Hi,
snip
I'm really curious to know why a new (global) useflag couldn't
do the trick.
Read Mart's mail again, that's exactly what he's proposing.
And if no-one objects, I'll be working this inside the gnome2 eclass
(with review on this list before the final commit of
Jim Ramsay [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Tue, 01 Jul 2008 11:29:56 -0400:
Mark Loeser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Its a good idea, but since our users don't always provide useful
reports, it seems like we are just shifting work around.
I'd suggest that this
Hi folks, it's that time again, time for the proto-gleps on
tree-signing. Barring two minor TODO items, I have completed all of the
series dealing with distribution issues and Manifest2.
The developer issues and gnupg management issues remain, but they don't
block the Manifest2 and distribution
Attached.
--
Robin Hugh Johnson
Gentoo Linux Developer Infra Guy
E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85
GLEP: xx
Title: Security of distribution of Gentoo software - Overview
Version: $Revision: 1.8 $
Last-Modified: $Date: 2008/07/01
Attached.
--
Robin Hugh Johnson
Gentoo Linux Developer Infra Guy
E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85
GLEP: xx+1
Title: Security of distribution of Gentoo software - Infrastructure to User
distribution - MetaManifest
Version: $Revision:
Attached.
--
Robin Hugh Johnson
Gentoo Linux Developer Infra Guy
E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85
GLEP: xx+4
Title: Manifest2 hash policies and security implications
Version: $Revision: 1.10 $
Last-Modified: $Date: 2008/07/01
Attached.
--
Robin Hugh Johnson
Gentoo Linux Developer Infra Guy
E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85
GLEP: xx+5
Title: Manifest2 filetypes
Version: $Revision: 1.15 $
Last-Modified: $Date: 2008/07/01 08:52:34 $
Author: Robin Hugh Johnson
This is a series of patches to use the in operator instead of the has_key()
method for dictionaries. The has_key() method is deprecated in python2.6 and
removed in python3.0.
I've also added DeprecationWarning's to classes that have a has_key() method so
people writing code using portage will be
---
pym/portage/cache/metadata_overlay.py |2 +-
pym/portage/cache/sql_template.py |2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/pym/portage/cache/metadata_overlay.py
b/pym/portage/cache/metadata_overlay.py
index 13d1278..e25759c 100644
---
---
pym/portage/elog/__init__.py |4 ++--
pym/portage/elog/filtering.py|2 +-
pym/portage/elog/messages.py |4 ++--
pym/portage/elog/mod_mail.py |2 +-
pym/portage/elog/mod_mail_summary.py |2 +-
5 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
---
bin/dispatch-conf |6 +++---
bin/dohtml|6 +++---
bin/glsa-check|4 ++--
bin/repoman | 14 +++---
4 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bin/dispatch-conf b/bin/dispatch-conf
index 28516c9..a8159cd 100755
---
---
pym/portage/__init__.py |4
pym/portage/cache/mappings.py | 12 +++-
pym/portage/cache/template.py |4
3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/pym/portage/__init__.py b/pym/portage/__init__.py
index 9e29435..1564aba 100644
---
These don't apply to the trunk anymore.
Updated patches can be found at: http://dev.gentoo.org/~hawking/py3k/portage/
--
Regards,
Ali Polatel
--
gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 02:41:14 +0800
Zhang Le [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this a bug? or did I miss something here?
Thanks for your time!
The 'bug' here is that USE=multislot shouldn't exist. People using it
should be able to deal with resulting breakages on their own
Marius
--
On 21:05 Tue 01 Jul , Marius Mauch wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 02:41:14 +0800
Zhang Le [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this a bug? or did I miss something here?
Thanks for your time!
The 'bug' here is that USE=multislot shouldn't exist. People using it
should be able to deal with
On 21:05 Tue 01 Jul , Marius Mauch wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 02:41:14 +0800
Zhang Le [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this a bug? or did I miss something here?
Thanks for your time!
The 'bug' here is that USE=multislot shouldn't exist. People using it
should be able to deal with
On Tuesday 01 July 2008, Marius Mauch wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 02:41:14 +0800
Is this a bug? or did I miss something here?
Thanks for your time!
The 'bug' here is that USE=multislot shouldn't exist.
not really. the SLOT syntax should be sufficiently flexible, but seeing as it
isnt, the
33 matches
Mail list logo
