Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Proposal for how to handle stable ebuilds

2008-11-18 Thread Daniel Gryniewicz
On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 19:08 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote: On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 10:10:57 -0500 Daniel Gryniewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 2008-11-16 at 18:38 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote: snip The maintainer MUST NOT NEVER EVER NOT EVEN A LITTLE BIT remove the latest stable ebuild of

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Proposal for how to handle stable ebuilds

2008-11-18 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:57:23 -0500 Daniel Gryniewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is not about arches just being slackers. This is about arches denying stable (or even ~) for some reason. If I cannot drop an old version of something just because the new version doesn't (and won't) work on

[gentoo-dev] Package for grab: libzzub and aldrin

2008-11-18 Thread Hanno Böck
Hi, Cite Aldrin is an open source modular music sequencer/tracker for the GNU/Linux operating system. It features a flexible audio routing system commonly found in expensive audio software, enabling you to mix, split, mutilate and modify audio signals emitted by software synthesizers and

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Proposal for how to handle stable ebuilds

2008-11-18 Thread Daniel Gryniewicz
On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 17:50 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:57:23 -0500 Daniel Gryniewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is not about arches just being slackers. This is about arches denying stable (or even ~) for some reason. If I cannot drop an old version of

[gentoo-dev] Looking for help with kernel maintenance

2008-11-18 Thread Daniel Drake
Hi, I'm looking to find one or more people to help out with gentoo-sources-2.6 maintenance (our primary supported kernel). Right now, me and Mike Pagano do most of the kernel work. I disappear fairly often and it's always good to have more than 1 active person on the project. I'm looking

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Proposal for how to handle stable ebuilds

2008-11-18 Thread Daniel Gryniewicz
On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 15:18 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote: On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:57:23 -0500 Daniel Gryniewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 19:08 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote: On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 10:10:57 -0500 Daniel Gryniewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 2008-11-16

[gentoo-dev] Re: Proposal for how to handle stable ebuilds

2008-11-18 Thread Ryan Hill
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 17:04:33 -0500 Daniel Gryniewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Honestly, I don't want to be a dick to the arch teams. I really don't. But I *also* don't want them (or policy) to be a dick to me. That's my whole point; that requirement of never removing the last stable ebuild,