On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 01:30:08 -0400
Jacob Godserv jacobgods...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 13:19, Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'm running a BoF session during the Linux Symposium 2010 in Ottawa next
week, entitled 'State of Gentoo'.
I've had my own uneducated
On Sun, 2010-07-11 at 01:28 -0400, Jacob Godserv wrote:
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 12:13, Enrico Weigelt weig...@metux.de wrote:
I've already explained the strategy behind the git repo (and not
doing plaintext patches). Please refer to my paper, and my other
mails posted recently on this list.
* Hans de Graaff gra...@gentoo.org schrieb:
I do understand the response, because part of the strategy mentioned
*is* not to provide plain-text patches, but instead manage them,
possibly jointly with other distributions, in a midstream repository.
Exactly.
The point is: I have to maintain
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Enrico Weigelt weig...@metux.de wrote:
The point is: I have to maintain lots of packages for different distros,
as well as for my own build system. I cannot do this manually for each
single distro, so I prefer doing _generic_ fixes and let the distro
Nirbheek Chauhan posted on Sun, 11 Jul 2010 14:28:35 +0530 as excerpted:
...
Please consider the patch-website idea above. We definitely need
someone to code it up, gather the source-package to distro patches
mappings,
...
Thanks for writing this up. Well said. =:^)
--
Duncan - List
* Nirbheek Chauhan nirbh...@gentoo.org schrieb:
If I understand your system correctly, you essentially maintain clones
of upstream repos, with all the various distro patches applied on top,
and release tarballs as well.
Yes. And if some upstream does not provide suitable vcs access
(or
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Enrico Weigelt weig...@metux.de wrote:
* Nirbheek Chauhan nirbh...@gentoo.org schrieb:
I don't see how these various distros can be made to agree with
each other and I certainly can't see them using a common tarball
source.
Thats not even necessary. They just
On 07/11/2010 08:02 AM, Doug Goldstein wrote:
If I really need to go to the council with every change, considering
it must be debated on the ML for at least X number of days prior to
going to the council, I'd more likely just remove MythTV from the tree
and maintain it in an overlay. I don't
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 7:49 AM, Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 07/11/2010 08:02 AM, Doug Goldstein wrote:
If I really need to go to the council with every change, considering
it must be debated on the ML for at least X number of days prior to
going to the council, I'd more
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Doug.
On 11-07-2010 16:03, Doug Goldstein wrote:
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 7:49 AM, Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 07/11/2010 08:02 AM, Doug Goldstein wrote:
If I really need to go to the council with every change, considering
it
On 07/11/2010 07:37 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
Simply put, the council's purpose is not to say oh we have to stop
development and have a 4 week debate about everything minor. The
council's purpose is to help decide between different technical
solutions and encourage people to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nirbheek,
thanks for writing such a well thought-out and comprehensive reply to
Enrico. I agree with all the points you raised.
On 11-07-2010 10:28, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Enrico Weigelt weig...@metux.de wrote:
*
As previously discussed on gentoo-dev there's now a eqawarn function
available in eutils.eclass. The function delegates to the Package
Manager implementation if available. To see QA messages after emerge
when using Portage you can add the following to your make.conf:
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 08:31:56PM +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
As previously discussed on gentoo-dev there's now a eqawarn function
available in eutils.eclass. The function delegates to the Package
Manager implementation if available. To see QA messages after emerge
when using Portage you can
On 07/11/2010 08:43 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 08:31:56PM +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
As previously discussed on gentoo-dev there's now a eqawarn function
available in eutils.eclass. The function delegates to the Package
Manager implementation if available. To see QA
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 08:53:56PM +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
On 07/11/2010 08:43 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 08:31:56PM +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
As previously discussed on gentoo-dev there's now a eqawarn function
available in eutils.eclass. The function delegates
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 07:47:24PM +0300, Petteri RRRty wrote:
On 07/11/2010 07:37 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
Simply put, the council's purpose is not to say oh we have to stop
development and have a 4 week debate about everything minor. The
council's purpose is to help
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
jmbsvice...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Doug.
On 11-07-2010 16:03, Doug Goldstein wrote:
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 7:49 AM, Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 07/11/2010 08:02 AM,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11-07-2010 21:56, Doug Goldstein wrote:
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
jmbsvice...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Doug.
Jorge,
I remember very clearly as you and I were
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 01:30:08AM -0400, Jacob Godserv wrote:
I've had my own uneducated ideas about this exact topic. I'd love to
hear more about this. Will notes or a recording be posted anywhere?
I'm uncertain if there is going to be any official (FOSDEM-like)
recording of the BoF sessions,
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2010-07-11 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
dev-db/mysql-community 2010-07-05 08:55:36 scarabeus
dev-perl/Email-MIME-Attachment-Stripper 2010-07-05 09:01:32 scarabeus
On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 21:19:09 + (UTC)
Markos Chandras (hwoarang) hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
hwoarang10/07/11 21:19:09
Modified: make.defaults
Log:
log eqawarn messages
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 profiles/targets/developer/make.defaults
* Nirbheek Chauhan nirbh...@gentoo.org schrieb:
Thats not even necessary. They just should use the infrastructure,
as described in my paper. So everyone can easily set up automatic
notifications, cherry-pick, etc, etc.
Why should we?
To make tracking and applying other's changes much
* Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto jmbsvice...@gentoo.org schrieb:
just because you decided to offer some service, it in no way forces
us to accept it.
No, it does not. I never claimed that.
And so really I dont understand that fundamentalistic kind of
argumentation (which is really near to
On 07/11/2010 02:50 PM, Samuli Suominen (ssuominen) wrote:
-LDFLAGS=-Wl,-O1
+LDFLAGS=-Wl,-O1 ${LDFLAGS}
My existing, custom, entry for LDFLAGS breaks with this change. Not nice.
%% grep LDFLAGS /etc/make.conf
LDFLAGS=${LDFLAGS},--hash-style=gnu -Wl,--as-needed
-Jeremy
On 07/12/2010 07:53 AM, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
On 07/11/2010 02:50 PM, Samuli Suominen (ssuominen) wrote:
-LDFLAGS=-Wl,-O1
+LDFLAGS=-Wl,-O1 ${LDFLAGS}
My existing, custom, entry for LDFLAGS breaks with this change. Not nice.
%% grep LDFLAGS /etc/make.conf
LDFLAGS=${LDFLAGS},--hash-style=gnu
On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 06:03:49PM -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 00:56:52 +0200
Enrico Weigelt weig...@metux.de wrote:
Hi folks,
YFYI: yet another of my ebuilds kicked-down.
It's an improved version of procmail, which automatically creates
missing maildir
On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 23:53:07 -0500
Jeremy Olexa darks...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 07/11/2010 02:50 PM, Samuli Suominen (ssuominen) wrote:
-LDFLAGS=-Wl,-O1
+LDFLAGS=-Wl,-O1 ${LDFLAGS}
My existing, custom, entry for LDFLAGS breaks with this change. Not nice.
%% grep LDFLAGS /etc/make.conf
28 matches
Mail list logo
