* Tomas Chvatal (scarabeus) scarab...@gentoo.org:
4) Bugs assigned to council@ in bugzilla and their progress
https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advancedshort_desc_type=
allwordssubstrshort_desc=long_desc_type=substringlong_desc=bug_file_loc_type
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 07:05:11PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 10:16:24PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
obviously you only mean linux x86/amd64 dev profiles. i dont have a strong
opinion on that small subset in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dne 10.8.2010 10:32, Torsten Veller napsal(a):
* Tomas Chvatal (scarabeus) scarab...@gentoo.org:
4) Bugs assigned to council@ in bugzilla and their progress
https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advancedshort_desc_type=
[Following a similar discussion in another mailing list]
As you know, only a few directories can be assumed to be available after
boot[1]. Notably, /usr and /var are not among them. Binaries in /bin
and /sbin should be enough to do basic maintanence/repair and to mount
other volumes. Since we
On 8/10/10 4:22 AM, Eray Aslan wrote:
1. Is this OK or should we file bugs against binaries in {/bin,/sbin} linking
against libraries in /usr/lib? Fix is relatively easy in general (give
--libdir=/lib against the config script)
I'd suggest a fix that is guaranteed to work: make portage refuse
# Diego E. Pettenò flamee...@gentoo.org (10 Aug 2010)
# on behalf of QA team
#
# Website's dead; install init scripts not suited for Gentoo
# rc system; there are no source packages, the files are
# directly in CVS; code comes 2002, and no way to track down
# anything newer; LICENSE value and
2010/8/10 Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 07:05:11PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 10:16:24PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
obviously you only mean linux x86/amd64 dev profiles. i dont
# Diego E. Pettenò flamee...@gentoo.org (10 Aug 2010)
# on behalf of QA team
#
# Breaks about any QA policy regarding not touching
# live filesystem as it writes to LVM configuration,
# cron configuration, current-running kernel modules, RPM
# library, ...
#
# Removal on 2010-10-09
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Francesco R wrote:
I don't know how --hash-style=gnu is used to check for LDFLAGS, so this may
be OT.
it looks to see what ELFs still have a .hash section
On my personal and _breakable_ desktop I do use
LDFLAGS=${LDFLAGS} -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--hash-style=gnu
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 4:45 AM, Brian Harring wrote:
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 07:05:11PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 10:16:24PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
obviously you only mean linux x86/amd64 dev profiles.
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 7:22 AM, Eray Aslan wrote:
net-firewall/iptables-1.4.6 /sbin/iptables-multi
linux-vdso.so.1 = (0x7fffc77e8000)
libip4tc.so.0 = /usr/lib/libip4tc.so.0 (0x7f27e4781000)
libxtables.so.4 = /usr/lib/libxtables.so.4 (0x7f27e4579000)
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
On 8/10/10 4:22 AM, Eray Aslan wrote:
1. Is this OK or should we file bugs against binaries in {/bin,/sbin} linking
against libraries in /usr/lib? Fix is relatively easy in general (give
--libdir=/lib against the config script)
I'd
Gentoo uses /usr/$(get_libdir)/nsbrowser/plugins for browser plugins.
However, Debian uses /usr/$(get_libdir)/mozilla/plugins, and that's what
many software projects (including Chromium) target.
Why are we using nsbrowser/plugins instead of mozilla/plugins, and how
relalistic would it be to
It seems like few of our fellow developers don't know how to track
down
packages that don't respect LDFLAGS. Adding -Wl,--hash-style=gnu is a
good way
to do that. I would like to see this linker flag enabled by default on
LDFLAGS
(or at least for the dev/ profiles for now). Do you agree?
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
It seems like few of our fellow developers don't know how to track
down
packages that don't respect LDFLAGS. Adding -Wl,--hash-style=gnu is a
good way
to do that. I would like to see this linker flag enabled by default on
LDFLAGS
(or
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 14:29:20 -0700 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
Why are we using nsbrowser/plugins instead of mozilla/plugins, and how
relalistic would it be to switch to mozilla/plugins?
--- nsplugins.eclass 1 May 2009 23:03:00 -
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 14:29:20 -0700
Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
Gentoo uses /usr/$(get_libdir)/nsbrowser/plugins for browser plugins.
However, Debian uses /usr/$(get_libdir)/mozilla/plugins, and that's
what many software projects (including Chromium) target.
Could you name
On 8/10/10 4:28 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
Gentoo uses /usr/$(get_libdir)/nsbrowser/plugins for browser plugins.
However, Debian uses /usr/$(get_libdir)/mozilla/plugins, and that's
what many software projects (including Chromium) target.
Could you name them? Opera looks into tons of
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
By the way, I just wonder... why not _symlink_ mozilla/plugins to
nsbrowser/plugins? That would solve the technical problem, while
keeping a good, more general name.
some plugins like to change their behavior based on the path they're
On Wednesday 11 of August 2010 05:50:47 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
On 8/10/10 4:28 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
Gentoo uses /usr/$(get_libdir)/nsbrowser/plugins for browser plugins.
However, Debian uses /usr/$(get_libdir)/mozilla/plugins, and that's
what many software projects (including
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/10/2010 11:40 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
By the way, I just wonder... why not _symlink_ mozilla/plugins to
nsbrowser/plugins? That would solve the technical problem, while
keeping a
21 matches
Mail list logo
