-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
As outlined in the global email about this issue, this email is to start
a thread about removing the files and profit. Please reply to this
thread if you have any comments about this point.
6. allow maintainers to work on .la files removal as th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
As outlined in the global email about this issue, this email is to start
a thread about the PM support. Please reply to this thread if you
have any comments about this point.
5. Get portage-2.1.9* marked stable.
As this portage version will fix
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
As outlined in the global email about this issue, this email is to start
a thread about the news item. Please reply to this thread if you
have any comments about this point.
4. Add the news item about pending .la files removal, pointing to 3 and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
As outlined in the global email about this issue, this email is to start
a thread about the QA document. Please reply to this thread if you
have any comments about this point.
3. Add a page to the QA project space (unless they're not interested)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
As outlined in the global email about this issue, this email is to start
a thread about the wording on when and how to drop .la files. Please
reply to this thread if you have any comments about this point.
2. Get a consensus about the wording of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
As outlined in the global email about this issue, this email is to start
a thread about the eutils function. Please reply to this thread if you
have any comments about this point.
1. Add a function to eutils to deal with the removal of the .la fi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
As decided in the last council's meeting, following the recent
discussions about .la files removal, I'm sending an email to this list
with a proposal for a plan to address this issue.
My proposal for the plan is the following:
1. Add a function
On 10/30/2010 08:10 AM, Thomas Sachau wrote:
> If i remember it right, the server profile was created for those people, who
> only want a minimum
> amount of default profile enabled USE flags (so no desktop profile because of
> that), but on the
> other side dont want to do the additional work/ch
# Pacho Ramos (30 Oct 2010)
# Build failures (bug 244543) and not required by
# anything in the tree.
# Pending Removal: 2010-11-30
=dev-cpp/gtkmm-2.2.12
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Jeroen Roovers posted on Sat, 30 Oct 2010 19:40:45 +0200 as excerpted:
> On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 09:44:42 +0400
> Peter Volkov wrote:
>
>> Also speaking about this specific package: I've maintained this package
>> quite long time and I'm following upstream mailing list and I've never
>> heard from u
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 09:44:42 +0400
Peter Volkov wrote:
> Also speaking about this specific package: I've maintained this
> package quite long time and I'm following upstream mailing list and
> I've never heard from upstream it's safe to push betas on all users.
I didn't push it on all users. May
On L, 2010-10-30 at 11:22 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> # Samuli Suominen (30 Oct 2010)
> # Still using GTK+-1.2
> # Masked for removal in 30 days
> net-misc/LinNeighborhood
What are the alternatives? Nautilus and Thunar?
I guess the suggestion is to mention in the mask message what could be
us
Am 30.10.2010 03:37, schrieb Donnie Berkholz:
> On 15:46 Fri 29 Oct , Thomas Sachau wrote:
>> Which raises the question, if those people, who want to install a
>> minimal server will mostly use apache or something different. And
>> especially for minimal setups, i dont think that apache will
Hi all,
While it is true we don't have real subsystem maintainers in Gentoo, I'd
like to ask everybody to shoot a request to the team maintaining a
general area before adding something that might fall into their
development usage.
In the past year I have witnessed a number of breakages due to add
On 10/30/2010 05:09 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 10:05:17AM +0400, Peter Volkov wrote:
>> В Птн, 29/10/2010 в 09:11 -0700, Alec Warner пишет:
>>> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 5:21 AM, Markos Chandras
>>> wrote:
>>> Can I install a machine with the server profile and USE=-ldap,
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 11:30:55AM +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 28-10-2010 09:25:23 +, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> > ssuominen10/10/28 09:25:23
> >
> > Modified: aggregate-1.6.ebuild
> > Log:
> > qa
>
> I think it would be good practice if you would give a summary of
> what type of QA
On 10/30/2010 10:56 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> Packages from dev-tinyos/ category have been slowly lastrited due to
> open QA issues during last year (or two).
>
> 17 open bugs, http://tinyurl.com/33h7fny
>
> I remember someone suggesting this before, but I can't seem to find the
> mail or IRC
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 10:05:17AM +0400, Peter Volkov wrote:
> В Птн, 29/10/2010 в 09:11 -0700, Alec Warner пишет:
> > On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 5:21 AM, Markos Chandras
> > wrote:
> > Can I install a machine with the server profile and USE=-ldap, but
> > still get ldap + pam working?
> > Can I in
# Samuli Suominen (30 Oct 2010)
# Still using GTK+-1.2
# Masked for removal in 30 days
net-misc/LinNeighborhood
# Samuli Suominen (30 Oct 2010)
# For Linux 2.4, bug 335455. Time to upgrade to 2.6.
# Masked for removal in 30 days
sys-apps/mondo
Packages from dev-tinyos/ category have been slowly lastrited due to
open QA issues during last year (or two).
17 open bugs, http://tinyurl.com/33h7fny
I remember someone suggesting this before, but I can't seem to find the
mail or IRC log about it, so asking now again.
В Птн, 29/10/2010 в 09:11 -0700, Alec Warner пишет:
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 5:21 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> Can I install a machine with the server profile and USE=-ldap, but
> still get ldap + pam working?
> Can I install a machine with the server profile and USE=-apache, but
> still get apac
21 matches
Mail list logo
