[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-python/pisa

2012-01-28 Thread Krzysztof Pawlik
# Krzysztof Pawlik nelch...@gentoo.org (27 Jan 2012) # Deprecated, please migrate your code to dev-python/xhtml2pdf. # Removal by end of February. dev-python/pisa -- Krzysztof Pawlik nelchael at gentoo.org key id: 0xF6A80E46 desktop-misc, java, vim, kernel, python, apache... signature.asc

[gentoo-dev] Lastrite: x11-misc/enter

2012-01-28 Thread Samuli Suominen
# Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org (28 Jan 2012) # Missing native ConsoleKit support and upstream has # stopped development. # Use lightdm, gdm, kdm, lxdm, slim (only latest), or xdm (only latest). # Removal in 30 days. x11-misc/enter

Re: [gentoo-dev] useless set*id binaries

2012-01-28 Thread Ulrich Mueller
On Sat, 28 Jan 2012, Samuli Suominen wrote: This is definitely not an improvement and should be reverted. The suid root is also needed to elevate cdrecord's scheduling priority. Missed that piece of code and reverted then. Any chance you could be more specific? cdrecord calls mlock(2),

Re: [gentoo-dev] useless set*id binaries

2012-01-28 Thread Michał Górny
On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 03:07:45 +0200 Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote: On 01/28/2012 02:41 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Friday 27 January 2012 19:18:07 Samuli Suominen wrote: On 01/28/2012 02:14 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: along these lines, why is cdrtools set*id ? if we have a

[gentoo-dev] Some news about status of ConsoleKit and Display Managers in Portage

2012-01-28 Thread Samuli Suominen
pambase-20101024-r2 will restore the same behavior as pambase-20101024 had; it will restore the 'nox11' argument to the pam_ck_connector.so line in /etc/pam.d/system-login. this pam_ck_connector.so module is now used only for console logins because all of the display managers we ship, have

Re: [gentoo-dev] useless set*id binaries

2012-01-28 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 01/28/2012 10:32 AM, Michał Górny wrote: On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 03:07:45 +0200 Samuli Suominenssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote: On 01/28/2012 02:41 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Friday 27 January 2012 19:18:07 Samuli Suominen wrote: On 01/28/2012 02:14 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: along these lines,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor?

2012-01-28 Thread Anthony G. Basile
On 01/27/2012 07:12 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Friday 27 January 2012 16:05:13 Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 21:13, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote: Again - only if we don't get a consensus here. Wait... Is anybody here *actually opposed* to not enabling PIE on *SUID binaries*?

[gentoo-dev] Packages maintained by jokey need a co-maintainer

2012-01-28 Thread Pacho Ramos
As talked with him, he won't be able to contribute a lot during the following months and then (Jokey: please remember to update your devaway message!!) would be nice to find co-maintainers for his packages: app-misc/bb app-misc/devtodo app-misc/ytree app-portage/maintainer-helper

[gentoo-dev] Packages maintained by bass need a co-maintainer

2012-01-28 Thread Pacho Ramos
As talked with him, he won't be able to contribute a lot during the following months and then would be nice to find co-maintainers for his packages if possible: app-admin/localepurge app-admin/recursos app-doc/ebookmerge app-misc/gnomecatalog dev-embedded/gnap-dev dev-embedded/gnap

[gentoo-dev] About obsolete/useless devaway messages

2012-01-28 Thread Pacho Ramos
Was reviewing http://dev.gentoo.org/devaway/ and I have seen there are a lot of obsolete messages. Could you take a look and verify don't have an old .away file in your homes ;) ? Thanks a lot signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] About obsolete/useless devaway messages

2012-01-28 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote: Was reviewing http://dev.gentoo.org/devaway/ and I have seen there are a lot of obsolete messages. Could you take a look and verify don't have an old .away file in your homes ;) ? Might not hurt to generally consider the

Re: [gentoo-dev] About obsolete/useless devaway messages

2012-01-28 Thread Pacho Ramos
El sáb, 28-01-2012 a las 10:57 -0500, Rich Freeman escribió: On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote: Was reviewing http://dev.gentoo.org/devaway/ and I have seen there are a lot of obsolete messages. Could you take a look and verify don't have an old .away file

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages maintained by jokey need a co-maintainer

2012-01-28 Thread Sergei Trofimovich
I'll look after app-misc/bb net-im/openfire -- Sergei signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] About obsolete/useless devaway messages

2012-01-28 Thread Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 01/28/2012 03:57 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote: Was reviewing http://dev.gentoo.org/devaway/ and I have seen there are a lot of obsolete messages. Could you take a look and

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages maintained by bass need a co-maintainer

2012-01-28 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday 28 January 2012 08:29:44 Pacho Ramos wrote: As talked with him, he won't be able to contribute a lot during the following months and then would be nice to find co-maintainers for his packages if possible: app-admin/localepurge can probably just be dropped. packages should respect

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages maintained by bass need a co-maintainer

2012-01-28 Thread Pacho Ramos
El sáb, 28-01-2012 a las 15:57 -0500, Mike Frysinger escribió: On Saturday 28 January 2012 08:29:44 Pacho Ramos wrote: As talked with him, he won't be able to contribute a lot during the following months and then would be nice to find co-maintainers for his packages if possible:

[gentoo-dev] Last Rites: dev-db/pgaccess

2012-01-28 Thread Mr. Aaron W. Swenson
# Aaron W. Swenson titanof...@gentoo.org (28 Jan 2012) # Masked for last rites. Package is no longer maintained upstream and # is not fully compatible with recent versions of PostgreSQL. Removal # in 60 days. # Alternatives: dev-db/pgadmin3 or dev-db/phppgadmin dev-db/pgaccess -- Mr. Aaron W.

[gentoo-dev] [FYI] php-lib-r1.eclass going to die

2012-01-28 Thread Matti Bickel
Hi folks, I thought I'd throw this out, so nobody is suprised when I start to put qawarns in the eclass: I don't think php-lib-r1.eclass has any value now that we have EAPI4. The only thing it basically does is a) setting RDEPEND=dev-lang/php and b) provide a php_lib_r1_src_install that accepts

[gentoo-dev] Keeping older versions around

2012-01-28 Thread Ryan Hill
I've run into this three times today, so I'm a little grumpy. When you bump to a new ~arch version, please consider keeping at least one previous ~arch version around, so if people run into major issues they can at lease try the previously installed version to determine if it's your package at

Re: [gentoo-dev] Keeping older versions around

2012-01-28 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 10:33 PM, Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote: When you bump to a new ~arch version, please consider keeping at least one previous ~arch version around, so if people run into major issues they can at lease try the previously installed version to determine if it's your

Re: [gentoo-dev] Dropping localepurge

2012-01-28 Thread Philip Webb
120128 Mike Frysinger wrote: On Saturday 28 January 2012 08:29:44 Pacho Ramos wrote: As talked with him, he won't be able to contribute a lot during the following months and then would be nice to find co-maintainers for his packages if possible: app-admin/localepurge can probably just be