On 16 September 2012 09:20, Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 12:03:36AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
On Sat, 15 Sep 2012 13:33:18 -0700
Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
To demonstrate the gain of this, we basically take the existing
tree's deps, and
At this point, the functionality built_with_use provides should
be covered near or more likely, in full, but USE deps in EAPI2 and
EAPI4; thus warn on usage.
While this may be a bit annoying, this is the only major consumer
left at this point that knows about /var/db/pkg layout; once that's
gone,
On Sat, 15 Sep 2012 18:20:26 -0700
Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 12:03:36AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
On Sat, 15 Sep 2012 13:33:18 -0700
Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
To demonstrate the gain of this, we basically take the existing
tree's
Gregory M. Turner wrote:
Please see https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=430722, especially
the final two posts.
I think the problem is that upstream isn't multilib-aware.
I also think that it would be awesome if Gentoo could handle such
situations for us. The brute force method would be to
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 09:56:27AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
But consider that for example Zac AxS (correct me if I recall it
correctly) considered making changing the meaning of RDEPEND to install
them before the build, thus effectively making 'build,run' useless.
I really am not trying
On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 04:10:01 -0700
Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 09:56:27AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
But consider that for example Zac AxS (correct me if I recall it
correctly) considered making changing the meaning of RDEPEND to
install them before
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 01:21:26PM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 04:10:01 -0700
Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 09:56:27AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
But consider that for example Zac AxS (correct me if I recall it
correctly)
On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 04:49:21 -0700
Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 01:21:26PM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 04:10:01 -0700
Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 09:56:27AM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
But
# Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org (16 Sep 2012)
# Dead upstream, fails tests (#315565), wasn't updated
# for recent MythTV versions. Removal in a month.
media-libs/gmyth
media-plugins/gst-plugins-mythtv
# Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org (16 Sep 2012)
# Fails old-elibtoolize sanity check (#341721), has
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 03:39:22PM +0800, Ben de Groot wrote:
On 16 September 2012 09:20, Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
Dumps are at
http://dev.gentoo.org/~ferringb/unified-dependencies-example/ .
Herds, if you want to see what your pkgs would look like, look at
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 02:02:24PM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 04:49:21 -0700
Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 01:21:26PM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote:
On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 04:10:01 -0700
Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
Folks-
Keeping it short and quick, a basic glep has been written for what I'm
proposing for DEPENDENCIES enhancement.
The live version of the doc is available at
http://dev.gentoo.org/~ferringb/unified-dependencies/extensible_dependencies.html
Wording fixes will occur, but the core concept
On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 06:52:11 -0700
Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
The live version of the doc is available at
http://dev.gentoo.org/~ferringb/unified-dependencies/extensible_dependencies.html
I think you're being a bit glib with your dismissal of the labels
parsing scheme. You've
On Sat, 15 Sep 2012 18:47:56 -0400
Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tuesday 11 September 2012 14:06:30 Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 00:23:11 + (UTC) Mike Frysinger wrote:
vapier 12/08/28 00:23:11
Modified: ChangeLog profiles.desc
Pacho Ramos wrote:
# Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org (16 Sep 2012)
# Upstream keeps inactive for ages and, then, it has broke again
# now with gnutls-3 (#421385). Removal in a month.
net-im/jabberd
What about the 1.4 version? It depends on openssl, so maybe it
doesn't have the gnutls issue.
I
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 03:39:49PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 06:52:11 -0700
Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
The live version of the doc is available at
http://dev.gentoo.org/~ferringb/unified-dependencies/extensible_dependencies.html
I think you're
On 16 September 2012 23:40, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
Pacho Ramos wrote:
# Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org (16 Sep 2012)
# Upstream keeps inactive for ages and, then, it has broke again
# now with gnutls-3 (#421385). Removal in a month.
net-im/jabberd
What about the 1.4 version? It
On Sep 16, 2012 4:55 PM, Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
Folks-
Keeping it short and quick, a basic glep has been written for what I'm
proposing for DEPENDENCIES enhancement.
The live version of the doc is available at
On Sun, 16 Sep 2012, Alex Alexander wrote:
Am I the only one who thinks that this dep:{build,...} thing looks
really ugly and is hard to read?
+1
IMO simply removing the dep part would greatly improve things:
DEPENDENCIES=
:build,run? ( ... )
:run? ( ... )
IMHO it would improve
On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 09:05:28 -0700
Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
Labels doesn't have this problem: it doesn't try to reuse an
existing syntax precisely because the existing syntax is extremely
awkward for this kind of thing.
Labels have a human comprehension problem, and require
On Sat, 15 Sep 2012, Michał Górny wrote:
Not used by any ebuild in the tree, and dev-util/tla was removed four
years ago.
Remove?
Yes, please.
tla.class will be removed in 30 days then.
Sending to -dev-announce as required by policy.
However, it should be moved to Sunrise; there's one
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2012-09-16 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
dev-db/pgpool 2012-09-16 12:21:52 pacho
dev-ruby/spruz 2012-09-16 12:24:30 pacho
On Sunday 16 September 2012 11:01:00 Alexis Ballier wrote:
also, you are missing some bug # for the 'broken deps' part. packages
that have gained broken deps when the profile was marked 'dev', or that
you committed with your profile.desc locally modified, do not count and
are your fault
On Sunday 16 September 2012 03:51:04 Brian Harring wrote:
+ if ! has $EAPI 0 1 2 3; then
+ eqawarn built_with_use should not be used in $EAPI; use USE
deps.
+ elif has $EAPI 2 3; then
+ if [[ $hidden == yes ]] || $missing_was_set; then
+
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 10:10:47PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sunday 16 September 2012 03:51:04 Brian Harring wrote:
+ if ! has $EAPI 0 1 2 3; then
+ eqawarn built_with_use should not be used in $EAPI; use USE
deps.
+ elif has $EAPI 2 3; then
+ if [[
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 07:32:39PM +0300, Alex Alexander wrote:
On Sep 16, 2012 4:55 PM, Brian Harring [1]ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
Folks-
Keeping it short and quick, a basic glep has been written for what
I'm
proposing for DEPENDENCIES enhancement.
The
Brian Harring wrote:
Comments?
: is used for namespaces elsewhere too. The familiarity is good.
//Peter
Ben de Groot wrote:
On 16 September 2012 23:40, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
Pacho Ramos wrote:
# Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org (16 Sep 2012)
# Upstream keeps inactive for ages and, then, it has broke again
# now with gnutls-3 (#421385). Removal in a month.
net-im/jabberd
What
On Sun, 2012-09-16 at 06:52 -0700, Brian Harring wrote:
Folks-
Keeping it short and quick, a basic glep has been written for what I'm
proposing for DEPENDENCIES enhancement.
The live version of the doc is available at
29 matches
Mail list logo
