[gentoo-dev] News draft #2 for the udev-210 upgrade (was: 209 upgrade)

2014-02-25 Thread Samuli Suominen
Here is a bit better worded news item for the upgrade. I think I've taken into account any concerns, but please check the grammar part. Thanks! - Samuli Title: Upgrade to =sys-fs/udev-210 Author: Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain Posted: 2014-02-25 Revision: 1

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item draft for =sys-fs/udev-209 upgrade

2014-02-25 Thread Joshua Kinard
On 02/24/2014 12:17 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote: On 24/02/14 10:55 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote: On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 7:58 AM, Thomas D. whi...@whissi.de wrote: Hi, not everyone is using systemd. On my systems for example, I

Re: [gentoo-dev] News draft #2 for the udev-210 upgrade (was: 209 upgrade)

2014-02-25 Thread Steev Klimaszewski
On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 10:43 +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote: Here is a bit better worded news item for the upgrade. I think I've taken into account any concerns, but please check the grammar part. Thanks! - Samuli CONFIG_DMIID isn't available for ARM. Can we make that warning go away if on

Re: [gentoo-dev] News draft #2 for the udev-210 upgrade (was: 209 upgrade)

2014-02-25 Thread Joshua Kinard
On 02/25/2014 5:27 AM, Steev Klimaszewski wrote: On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 10:43 +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote: Here is a bit better worded news item for the upgrade. I think I've taken into account any concerns, but please check the grammar part. Thanks! - Samuli CONFIG_DMIID isn't available

Re: AW: Re: [gentoo-dev] News item draft for =sys-fs/udev-209 upgrade

2014-02-25 Thread Joshua Kinard
On 02/24/2014 12:48 PM, Lars Wendler (Polynomial-C) wrote: This is another good reason why udev should have _never_ been integrated into systemd! In case someone still wants to retain his original systemd INSTALL_MASK, just use udev ebuilds from poly-c overlay. These ebuilds There's

[gentoo-dev] Re: News draft #2 for the udev-210 upgrade (was: 209 upgrade)

2014-02-25 Thread Duncan
Samuli Suominen posted on Tue, 25 Feb 2014 10:43:15 +0200 as excerpted: Here is a bit better worded news item for the upgrade. Looks much better, thanks. =:^) But... The options CONFIG_DMIID Umm... Don't Mind if I do? That's what google says about DMIID, and there's nothing about it on

Re: [gentoo-dev] News draft #2 for the udev-210 upgrade (was: 209 upgrade)

2014-02-25 Thread Thomas D.
Hi, line 16 (renamed the file to /lib/udev/rules.d/80-net-setup-link.rules) and line 18 (you can override in /etc/systemd/network/) doesn't end with punctuation. Did I get this right? I am using udev to give my interfaces custom names and I am not a systemd user but to keep my setup working

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFD: new global USE flag gtk3

2014-02-25 Thread Alex Alexander
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 6:59 PM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote: Tom Wijsman wrote: I'd say that if around 7 people vote on the matter that that is based on a necessary amount of understanding. That is just incredibly naïve. [...] In history lessons you may have learned about

Re: [gentoo-dev] News draft #2 for the udev-210 upgrade (was: 209 upgrade)

2014-02-25 Thread Joshua Kinard
On 02/25/2014 6:39 AM, Thomas D. wrote: Hi, line 16 (renamed the file to /lib/udev/rules.d/80-net-setup-link.rules) and line 18 (you can override in /etc/systemd/network/) doesn't end with punctuation. Did I get this right? I am using udev to give my interfaces custom names and I am

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: git-r3, additional clone types

2014-02-25 Thread hasufell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Michał Górny: Dnia 2014-02-24, o godz. 22:40:34 hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org napisał(a): Mode upgrades and downgrades Mode is not associated persistently with a repository. Therefore, using a repository in a

Re: [gentoo-dev] News draft #2 for the udev-210 upgrade (was: 209 upgrade)

2014-02-25 Thread Rich Freeman
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Thomas D. whi...@whissi.de wrote: Also, I cannot belief that I cannot overwrite /lib/udev/rules.d/80-net-setup-link.rules via /etc/udev/rules.d... I don't see why not - from the news item: So, to clarify, you can override the new .rules file or the .link file in

Re: [gentoo-dev] News draft #2 for the udev-210 upgrade (was: 209 upgrade)

2014-02-25 Thread Thomas D.
Hi, Rich Freeman wrote: On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Thomas D. whi...@whissi.de wrote: Also, I cannot belief that I cannot overwrite /lib/udev/rules.d/80-net-setup-link.rules via /etc/udev/rules.d... I don't see why not - from the news item: So, to clarify, you can override the new

Re: [gentoo-dev] News draft #2 for the udev-210 upgrade (was: 209 upgrade)

2014-02-25 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 25/02/14 14:18, Joshua Kinard wrote: On 02/25/2014 6:39 AM, Thomas D. wrote: Hi, line 16 (renamed the file to /lib/udev/rules.d/80-net-setup-link.rules) and line 18 (you can override in /etc/systemd/network/) doesn't end with punctuation. Did I get this right? I am using udev to give

[gentoo-dev] gentoo-news: 2014: 2014-01-31-catalyst-head-changes.en.txt is missing it's gpg armour

2014-02-25 Thread Samuli Suominen
2014/2014-01-31-catalyst-head-changes.en.txt is missing it's gpg armour: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/GLEP:42#News_Item_Files

Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-news: 2014: 2014-01-31-catalyst-head-changes.en.txt is missing it's gpg armour

2014-02-25 Thread Ulrich Mueller
On Tue, 25 Feb 2014, Samuli Suominen wrote: 2014/2014-01-31-catalyst-head-changes.en.txt is missing it's gpg armour: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/GLEP:42#News_Item_Files Maybe the git update hook could check if the armour is present? Ulrich pgpNmdtbMHoRF.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item draft for =sys-fs/udev-209 upgrade

2014-02-25 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 5:12 AM, Joshua Kinard ku...@gentoo.org wrote: On 02/24/2014 12:17 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote: On 24/02/14 10:55 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote: On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 7:58 AM, Thomas D. whi...@whissi.de

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD: new global USE flag gtk3

2014-02-25 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 20/02/14 18:27, Tom Wijsman wrote: On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 11:26:18 +0200 Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote: On 20/02/14 10:47, Steev Klimaszewski wrote: On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 10:40 +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote: On 20/02/14 09:44, Steev Klimaszewski wrote: On Thu, 2014-02-20 at

Re: [gentoo-dev] News draft #2 for the udev-210 upgrade (was: 209 upgrade)

2014-02-25 Thread Rich Freeman
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Thomas D. whi...@whissi.de wrote: Rich Freeman wrote: On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Thomas D. whi...@whissi.de wrote: Also, I cannot belief that I cannot overwrite /lib/udev/rules.d/80-net-setup-link.rules via /etc/udev/rules.d... I don't see why not -

Re: [gentoo-dev] News draft #2 for the udev-210 upgrade (was: 209 upgrade)

2014-02-25 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 7:32 AM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote: I haven't looked into the details as to why a config file is stored in /lib/systemd, but I imagine that they're trying to store settings in one place and have them applied to multiple executables (though obviously by

[gentoo-dev] Re: mbox -- looks sort of interesting

2014-02-25 Thread Michael Palimaka
On 02/22/2014 08:50 PM, Александр Берсенев wrote: Hello, I've updated the autodep and testing it now. Thanks for taking the time to do this!

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item draft for =sys-fs/udev-209 upgrade

2014-02-25 Thread Peter Stuge
Lars Wendler wrote: - try to prevent most naming pollution of pure udev with systemd crap. childish. me don't like pink ponies. pink too much. pony okay. Riiight... as udev has anything else to do with systemd other than being uselessly integrated into systemd whereas it can still work

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD: new global USE flag gtk3

2014-02-25 Thread Tom Wijsman
On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 17:28:41 +0200 Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote: On 20/02/14 18:27, Tom Wijsman wrote: On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 11:26:18 +0200 Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote: On 20/02/14 10:47, Steev Klimaszewski wrote: On Thu, 2014-02-20 at 10:40 +0200, Samuli

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: mbox -- looks sort of interesting

2014-02-25 Thread Александр Берсенев
You are welcome! While testing I found strange race-condition bug in portage, I've filed it here: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=502428 2014-02-26 0:28 GMT+06:00 Michael Palimaka kensing...@gentoo.org: On 02/22/2014 08:50 PM, Александр Берсенев wrote: Hello, I've updated the

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: media-gfx/kgraphviewer

2014-02-25 Thread Michael Palimaka
# Michael Palimaka kensing...@gentoo.org (26 Feb 2014) # Doesn't build with recent graphviz. Dead upstream. # Masked for removal in 30 days. Bug #491760. media-gfx/kgraphviewer

Re: [gentoo-dev] News draft #2 for the udev-210 upgrade (was: 209 upgrade)

2014-02-25 Thread Alex Xu
Title: =sys-fs/udev-210 upgrade Author: Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain Posted: 2014-02-25 Revision: 1 News-Item-Format: 1.0 Display-If-Installed: sys-fs/udev-210 As of sys-fs/udev-210, the options CONFIG_FHANDLE and CONFIG_NET are now required in the kernel. A

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item draft for =sys-fs/udev-209 upgrade

2014-02-25 Thread Lars Wendler
On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 19:46:23 +0100 Peter Stuge wrote: Lars Wendler wrote: - try to prevent most naming pollution of pure udev with systemd crap. childish. me don't like pink ponies. pink too much. pony okay. Riiight... as udev has anything else to do with systemd other than being

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item draft for =sys-fs/udev-209 upgrade

2014-02-25 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Lars Wendler polynomia...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 19:46:23 +0100 Peter Stuge wrote: Lars Wendler wrote: - try to prevent most naming pollution of pure udev with systemd crap. childish. me don't like pink ponies. pink too much. pony okay.

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: git-r3, additional clone types

2014-02-25 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2014-02-24, o godz. 22:14:04 Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se napisał(a): I would prefer if I needed to allow such mode upgrades explicitly. That sounds like a lot ebuilds failing, requesting you to explicitly change the mode. I think that's OK. If I've set a mode then I prefer