[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: kernel-2.eclass Prefix support

> On Sun, 12 Jun 2016, Benda Xu wrote: > I have added EPREFIX logics for EAPI<3 and improved the trailing > slashes and quotes. > - [[ -f ${ROOT}/usr/include/linux/autoconf.h ]] \ > + [[ -f "${EROOT}"usr/include/linux/autoconf.h ]] \ Inside [[ ]] quotes are generally

Re: Facilitating user contributed ebuilds (Was: [gentoo-dev] The future of the Sunrise project)

On 12/06/16 04:53, james wrote: > > So I read this bug, but it did not illuminate an active archive, but the > requests and subsequent problems encountered, or did i miss it? It > looks like the kinks are being worked out. PM having a ML is a great > idea. > > > Interesting. I found the ML @

Re: Facilitating user contributed ebuilds (Was: [gentoo-dev] The future of the Sunrise project)

On 06/12/2016 04:57 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > On 06/12/2016 05:53 AM, james wrote: > >> I only see (2) posts in the ML, so is it active? > > It is a new ML, but it is active to the extent that you should expect to > see discussion on it > To elaborate on this, there were posts on it

Re: Facilitating user contributed ebuilds (Was: [gentoo-dev] The future of the Sunrise project)

On 06/12/2016 05:53 AM, james wrote: > On 06/11/2016 08:29 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: >> On 06/12/2016 04:20 AM, james wrote: >>> >>> Is there an archive to this wonderful list? I cannot seem to find the >>> archive? >> >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=581370 >> > > So I read this

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: kernel-2.eclass Prefix support

Thanks Zac, Göktürk, I have added EPREFIX logics for EAPI<3 and improved the trailing slashes and quotes. Benda --- kernel-2.eclass 2016-02-17 22:46:25.235543840 +0900 +++ kernel-2.eclass 2016-06-12 11:48:19.843801138 +0900 @@ -105,6 +105,8 @@ HOMEPAGE="https://www.kernel.org/

Re: Facilitating user contributed ebuilds (Was: [gentoo-dev] The future of the Sunrise project)

On 06/11/2016 08:29 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: On 06/12/2016 04:20 AM, james wrote: Is there an archive to this wonderful list? I cannot seem to find the archive? https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=581370 So I read this bug, but it did not illuminate an active archive, but the

Re: Facilitating user contributed ebuilds (Was: [gentoo-dev] The future of the Sunrise project)

On 06/11/2016 05:52 PM, waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote: On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 10:58:35PM +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote On 06/11/2016 10:53 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote: On 06/11/2016 07:48 AM, james wrote: [snip] Good/Bad idea, posting proxy-maintainer questions to gentoo-user? (recall irc

Re: Facilitating user contributed ebuilds (Was: [gentoo-dev] The future of the Sunrise project)

On 06/12/2016 04:20 AM, james wrote: > > Is there an archive to this wonderful list? I cannot seem to find the > archive? https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=581370 -- Kristian Fiskerstrand OpenPGP certificate reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: kernel-2.eclass Prefix support

Benda Xu: > Hi Fellows, > > This is a trivial patch for kernel-2.eclass to support Prefix. Does it > look good to be commited? > > Thanks, > Benda > > Bug: 478436 > --- kernel-2.eclass 2016-02-17 22:46:25.235543840 +0900 > +++ kernel-2.eclass 2016-05-24 01:14:22.246809021 +0900 > @@ -539,8

Re: Facilitating user contributed ebuilds (Was: [gentoo-dev] The future of the Sunrise project)

On 06/11/2016 03:59 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote: On 06/11/2016 01:58 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: On 06/11/2016 10:53 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote: On 06/11/2016 07:48 AM, james wrote: There is also a gentoo-proxy-ma...@lists.gentoo.org list for these kinds of questions that is likely more

Re: Facilitating user contributed ebuilds (Was: [gentoo-dev] The future of the Sunrise project)

On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 10:58:35PM +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote > On 06/11/2016 10:53 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote: > > On 06/11/2016 07:48 AM, james wrote: > >> [snip] > >> > >> Good/Bad idea, posting proxy-maintainer questions to gentoo-user? > >> (recall irc does not work for me). Also, it

Re: [gentoo-dev] [gentoo-dev-announce] Last rites: dev-util/{...}

Am 11.06.2016 um 21:41 schrieb Matthias Schwarzott: > Am 05.06.2016 um 21:04 schrieb Robin H. Johnson: >> On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 01:47:48PM +0200, Patrice Clement wrote: >>> dev-util/cdecl >>> dev-util/dwarves >>> dev-util/intel2gas >>> dev-util/lsuio >>> dev-util/mock >>> dev-util/par >>>

Re: Facilitating user contributed ebuilds (Was: [gentoo-dev] The future of the Sunrise project)

On 06/11/2016 01:58 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > On 06/11/2016 10:53 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote: >> On 06/11/2016 07:48 AM, james wrote: >>> [snip] >>> >>> Good/Bad idea, posting proxy-maintainer questions to gentoo-user? >>> (recall irc does not work for me). Also, it might just spur on

Re: Facilitating user contributed ebuilds (Was: [gentoo-dev] The future of the Sunrise project)

On 06/11/2016 10:53 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote: > On 06/11/2016 07:48 AM, james wrote: >> [snip] >> >> Good/Bad idea, posting proxy-maintainer questions to gentoo-user? >> (recall irc does not work for me). Also, it might just spur on other >> users to create/maintain a few packages in their own

Re: Facilitating user contributed ebuilds (Was: [gentoo-dev] The future of the Sunrise project)

On 06/11/2016 07:48 AM, james wrote: > [snip] > > Good/Bad idea, posting proxy-maintainer questions to gentoo-user? > (recall irc does not work for me). Also, it might just spur on other > users to create/maintain a few packages in their own area of interest. Anyone is welcome to post to either

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

El sáb, 11-06-2016 a las 22:48 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió: > El jue, 02-06-2016 a las 10:42 -0500, james escribió: > > > > On 06/01/2016 06:20 PM, Justin Bronder wrote: > >  > Due to a lack of time and the fact I don't use any of these > > packages  > >  > anymore, they are all up for grabs. > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

El jue, 02-06-2016 a las 10:42 -0500, james escribió: > On 06/01/2016 06:20 PM, Justin Bronder wrote: >  > Due to a lack of time and the fact I don't use any of these > packages  >  > anymore, they are all up for grabs. >  > >  >  - media-gfx/openmesh [no project] >  >  -

Re: [gentoo-dev] Council Council: call for agenda items for June 12 meeting

On 06/11/2016 06:18 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 8:09 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: >> >> Yeah, I also fail to see what is wrong with suggesting the items for >> the agenda... is not that the purpose of this call? Or maybe I am >> missing some replies to the thread

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

This packages are now up for grabs: app-admin/ccze app-crypt/ckpass app-mobilephone/sobexsrv dev-libs/libkpass media-gfx/qrencode sys-apps/razercfg x11-misc/xdotool

Re: [gentoo-dev] [gentoo-dev-announce] Last rites: dev-util/{...}

Am 05.06.2016 um 21:04 schrieb Robin H. Johnson: > On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 01:47:48PM +0200, Patrice Clement wrote: >> dev-util/cdecl >> dev-util/dwarves >> dev-util/intel2gas >> dev-util/lsuio >> dev-util/mock >> dev-util/par >> dev-util/tinlink >> dev-util/usb-robot > I've used the above subset

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: kernel-2.eclass Prefix support

On 06/11/2016 08:02 AM, Benda Xu wrote: > Hi Fellows, > > This is a trivial patch for kernel-2.eclass to support Prefix. Does it > look good to be commited? The EPREFIX and EROOT variables are undefined prior to EAPI 3, so the eclass should die if the EAPI is 0, 1, or 2. -- Thanks, Zac

[gentoo-dev] RFC: kernel-2.eclass Prefix support

Hi Fellows, This is a trivial patch for kernel-2.eclass to support Prefix. Does it look good to be commited? Thanks, Benda Bug: 478436 --- kernel-2.eclass 2016-02-17 22:46:25.235543840 +0900 +++ kernel-2.eclass 2016-05-24 01:14:22.246809021 +0900 @@ -539,8 +522,8 @@

Re: Facilitating user contributed ebuilds (Was: [gentoo-dev] The future of the Sunrise project)

On 06/10/2016 10:09 PM, konsolebox wrote: On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 11:53 PM, james wrote: The grandiose-ness you propose should only come upon graduating from proxy school, imho. user-->strong-users-->proxy-->dev pathway. Pedantic, bureaucratic, procedure-oriented,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Council Council: call for agenda items for June 12 meeting

On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 8:09 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Yeah, I also fail to see what is wrong with suggesting the items for > the agenda... is not that the purpose of this call? Or maybe I am > missing some replies to the thread :| > I'm not entirely sure I've caught

Re: [gentoo-dev] Council Council: call for agenda items for June 12 meeting

El sáb, 11-06-2016 a las 03:35 -0700, Daniel Campbell escribió: > On 06/10/2016 02:45 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > Considering the strength of response from a Council member, I would > > like to officially apologize for providing the agenda items and I > > would > > like to

Re: Facilitating user contributed ebuilds (Was: [gentoo-dev] The future of the Sunrise project)

On 06/10/2016 09:05 AM, Alec Ten Harmsel wrote: > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 04:20:06PM +0100, M. J. Everitt wrote: >> (2) any user can edit wiki pages not governed by Projects. Even Project >> pages I'm sure could be updated by means of patches submitted to the >> appropriate team, with some basic

Re: [gentoo-dev] Council Council: call for agenda items for June 12 meeting

On 06/10/2016 02:45 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > Hello, > > Considering the strength of response from a Council member, I would > like to officially apologize for providing the agenda items and I would > like to withdraw them all appropriately. Thank you for your time, and I > wish you re-election.

Re: Facilitating user contributed ebuilds (Was: [gentoo-dev] The future of the Sunrise project)

Presently, the way to make contributions as outlined in [1] is to create a bugzilla ticket and attach the patch to that ticket. But there is no community involvement really for this. A possible model for increasing user-collaboration and promoting user activity: >From User's POV: - Do emerge

Re: Facilitating user contributed ebuilds (Was: [gentoo-dev] The future of the Sunrise project)

On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 11:09:39 +0800 konsolebox wrote: > On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 11:53 PM, james wrote: > > The grandiose-ness you propose should only come upon graduating from proxy > > school, imho. > > user-->strong-users-->proxy-->dev pathway. > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Council Council: call for agenda items for June 12 meeting

I think the demise or replacement of the sunrise project should be put on the agenda possibly. This is not anything official, just a hopefully helpful suggestion. On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > Hello, > > Considering the strength of response from a