W dniu nie, 10.05.2020 o godzinie 21∶32 -0700, użytkownik Zac Medico
napisał:
> The feature enables finer grained locks for install operations, and
> everyone agrees that it's safe to enable by default.
Who's 'everyone' and where's their analysis of the problem?
The manpage doesn't really help
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 4:00 PM William Hubbs wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 01:45:45AM +0300, Andreas K. Hüttel wrote:
> > > This patch makes migrating mandatory by forcing ebuilds to die if they
> > > have EGO_VENDOR set and are using go-module.eclass.
> >
> > You can't commit this as long
W dniu pon, 11.05.2020 o godzinie 20∶20 -0400, użytkownik Aisha Tammy
napisał:
> Hi devs@,
> Seems like for some reason the gentoo.org does not publish the
> gpg public keys of the senders, even though it is signed correctly.
Why do you claim that? How did you verify it? Why are you jumping
On 5/11/20 8:20 PM, Aisha Tammy wrote:
> Hi devs@,
> Seems like for some reason the gentoo.org does not publish the
> gpg public keys of the senders, even though it is signed correctly.
>
Sorry, I meant **mail signing**, not commit signing.
Just saw that wording was confusing.
> Just wanted
Hi devs@,
Seems like for some reason the gentoo.org does not publish the
gpg public keys of the senders, even though it is signed correctly.
Just wanted to know why the devs are required to use gpg keys, glep63 [1]
but even when the server has the public keys, they aren't published properly.
[2020-05-11 12:39:05+0200] Tobias Klausmann:
> Hi!
>
> As per subject. I am not running any Jabber infrastructure
> anymore.
>
> Package is in decent shape. Lua 5.2 compatibility is not there,
> but I don't see 5.2 happening soon anyway. The rest of the bugs
> are nice-to-haves and cosmetic
# William Hubbs (2020-05-11)
# No reverse dependencies, upstream has superseeded this with the
# ggoogle.golang.org/protobuf module.
# Removal in 30 days. Bug #722542.
dev-go/go-protobuf
Thanks,
William
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 01:45:45AM +0300, Andreas K. Hüttel wrote:
> > This patch makes migrating mandatory by forcing ebuilds to die if they
> > have EGO_VENDOR set and are using go-module.eclass.
>
> You can't commit this as long as there is a single such ebuild in the tree.
Sure, and I'm
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 09:51:45AM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 5:16 PM William Hubbs wrote:
> >
> > All,
> >
> > now that go 1.14.2 is stable, I want to remove the EGO_VENDOR support from
> > go-module.eclass.
> >
> > This was kept when the EGO_SUM support was added on 4
> This patch makes migrating mandatory by forcing ebuilds to die if they
> have EGO_VENDOR set and are using go-module.eclass.
You can't commit this as long as there is a single such ebuild in the tree.
--
Andreas K. Hüttel
dilfri...@gentoo.org
Gentoo Linux developer
(council, qa,
# Amadeusz Żołnowski (2020-05-11)
# Masked for removal in 30 days. Unmaintained upstream.
sys-boot/plymouth-openrc-plugin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 5/11/20 2:35 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> W dniu nie, 10.05.2020 o godzinie 14∶54 -0400, użytkownik Aisha Tammy
> napisał:
>> On 5/10/20 2:11 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>>> W dniu nie, 10.05.2020 o godzinie 07∶21 -0400, użytkownik Aisha
>>> Tammy
>>> napisał:
On 5/10/20 2:02 AM, Michał Górny
On Sun, 10 May 2020 19:29:34 -0700
Zac Medico wrote:
> This includes a _compat_upgrade.binpkg_compression script that the
> ebuild can call in pkg_preinst in order to maintain a
> backward-compatible bzip2 default when appropriate, ensuring that
> binary package consumers are not caught off
On Sun, 10 May 2020 21:32:25 -0700
Zac Medico wrote:
> The feature enables finer grained locks for install operations, and
> everyone agrees that it's safe to enable by default.
>
> Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/715110
> Signed-off-by: Zac Medico
> ---
> cnf/make.globals | 2 +-
> 1 file
# Michał Górny (2020-05-11)
# Causes downgrades of multiple Python packages. Not touched since
# initial commit, waiting for a bump to the final release. Maintainer
# unresponsive. Upstream recommends installing in a virtualenv.
# Removal in 30 days. Bug #710406.
acct-group/octoprint
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 06:13:19PM +0200, David Seifert wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-05-11 at 09:51 -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> > On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 5:16 PM William Hubbs
> > wrote:
> > > All,
> > >
> > > now that go 1.14.2 is stable, I want to remove the EGO_VENDOR
> > > support from
> > >
On Mon, 2020-05-11 at 09:51 -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 5:16 PM William Hubbs
> wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > now that go 1.14.2 is stable, I want to remove the EGO_VENDOR
> > support from
> > go-module.eclass.
> >
> > This was kept when the EGO_SUM support was added on 4
On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 5:16 PM William Hubbs wrote:
>
> All,
>
> now that go 1.14.2 is stable, I want to remove the EGO_VENDOR support from
> go-module.eclass.
>
> This was kept when the EGO_SUM support was added on 4 Mar, with a qa
> warning advising people to migrate their ebuilds to EGO_SUM.
Hi!
As per subject. I am not running any Jabber infrastructure
anymore.
Package is in decent shape. Lua 5.2 compatibility is not there,
but I don't see 5.2 happening soon anyway. The rest of the bugs
are nice-to-haves and cosmetic stuff.
I'll keep myself in the maintainers file for another
On 5/11/20 10:00 AM, Joonas Niilola wrote:
>
> And here are packages that were co-maintained by lxqt project, or by
> individual devs:
>
>
> media-gfx/gpicview
And this by graphics...
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hey all,
since LXDE has no project members, and no one joined for a long time or
picked up the packages, let's properly reassign them. Here are packages
that were dropped to maintainer-needed:
lxde-base/lxde-icon-theme
lxde-base/lxtask
lxde-base/lxappearance-obconf
lxde-base/lxrandr
W dniu nie, 10.05.2020 o godzinie 14∶54 -0400, użytkownik Aisha Tammy
napisał:
> On 5/10/20 2:11 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > W dniu nie, 10.05.2020 o godzinie 07∶21 -0400, użytkownik Aisha
> > Tammy
> > napisał:
> > > On 5/10/20 2:02 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > > > W dniu sob, 09.05.2020 o
22 matches
Mail list logo
