Hi,
Am Montag, 29. Okt 2007, 07:45:48 -0400 schrieb Mike Frysinger:
On Monday 22 October 2007, Bertram Scharpf wrote:
when setting up LDAP Pam authentication I encountered a
problem that seems to be neither Slapd- nor
nss_ldap-specific.
for future reference, this belongs on the users
the problem was
Gentoo-specific or not.
Bertram
--
Bertram Scharpf
Stuttgart, Deutschland/Germany
http://www.bertram-scharpf.de
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Hi,
Am Montag, 29. Okt 2007, 12:41:51 -0400 schrieb Mike Frysinger:
On Monday 29 October 2007, Bertram Scharpf wrote:
Am Montag, 29. Okt 2007, 08:47:28 -0400 schrieb Mike Frysinger:
while that sucks, it still does not make it appropriate for this list
As I wrote in the first post
the same behaviour?
Thanks in advance,
Bertram
--
Bertram Scharpf
Stuttgart, Deutschland/Germany
http://www.bertram-scharpf.de
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Hi,
Am Montag, 22. Okt 2007, 13:44:19 +0100 schrieb Benjamin Smee:
On Monday 22 October 2007 13:12:29 Bertram Scharpf wrote:
@(#) $OpenLDAP: slapd 2.3.38 (Oct 18 2007 22:12:26) $
[EMAIL
PROTECTED]:/var/tmp/portage/net-nds/openldap-2.3.38/work/openldap-2.3.38/
servers/slapd
Hi,
Am Montag, 22. Okt 2007, 08:48:59 -0700 schrieb Alec Warner:
On 10/22/07, Bertram Scharpf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to determine _what_ nss is asked for?
Sure, turn on nscd in super debug mode and you should see most, if not
all the requests.
A _really_ cool idea. Thanks
Hi,
Am Montag, 22. Okt 2007, 15:30:59 +0200 schrieb Michael Hanselmann:
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 02:12:29PM +0200, Bertram Scharpf wrote:
Therefore I suppose the slapd daemon tries to obtain passwd/shadow
information for ldap via nss_ldap.
Yes, it does. Therefore, use something like
