Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Change mail-mta/msmtp to be the default in virtual/mta instead of mail-mta/ssmtp ?

2012-03-13 Thread Christian Birchinger
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 08:20:08PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:07:48PM +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote: > > ssmtp has been quiet project for quite a while, where as msmtp is > > maintained one. > > > > sure, ssmtp might be just mature, but msmtp is equally small and h

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: media-plugins/audacious-xosd

2010-09-10 Thread Christian Birchinger
# Christian Birchinger (11 Sep 2010) # Masked for removal in 30 days. Doesn't work # with recent Audacious and the included ghosd # plugin is a perfect replacment. media-plugins/audacious-xosd

Re: [gentoo-dev] SDLMame maintainer with Gnome setup wanted

2008-07-26 Thread Christian Birchinger
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 11:07:10PM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote: > Christian Birchinger wrote: >> Hello >> Anyone interested in maintaining further SDLMame updates? >> Beginning with 0.126 it requires GConf to get a font setting >> for it's now mandatory debugger.

[gentoo-dev] SDLMame maintainer with Gnome setup wanted

2008-07-24 Thread Christian Birchinger
Hello Anyone interested in maintaining further SDLMame updates? Beginning with 0.126 it requires GConf to get a font setting for it's now mandatory debugger. I use a plain XFCE setup and don't really want to install stuff like Orbit and GConf etc. My patch to have GConf optional was rejected by

Re: [gentoo-dev] stripping out the DO NOT REPLY from bugzie emails

2007-09-30 Thread Christian Birchinger
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 06:31:06PM -0500, Andrew Gaffney wrote: > It seems that not everybody loves the new "DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL" > header at the top of every bugzie email as much as robbat2 does. Because of > that, robbat2, KingTaco, and I came up with a procmail recipe that uses sed > t

Re: [gentoo-dev] Firefox 1.5 series will get removed in 30 days

2007-03-29 Thread Christian Birchinger
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 12:23:49PM +0300, Petteri Räty wrote: > If you read what you are quoting: > > >> Mozilla will drop support for that series from 24 April 2007 onwards. That's still almost a month + the time no security issues appear. This would be still better. Christian -- gentoo-dev@ge

Re: [gentoo-dev] Firefox 1.5 series will get removed in 30 days

2007-03-29 Thread Christian Birchinger
On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 05:03:37PM +0100, Raúl Porcel wrote: >Hi, > >The mozilla team has decided that the >www-client/mozilla-firefox[-bin]-1.5* series will get masked two weeks >from now (18 Mar 2007), that is 1 April 2007. And will be removed after >two weeks from that date, which will be 15 Apr

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: What do you think about removing gtk-1.2 theme engines from tree?

2007-02-28 Thread Christian Birchinger
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 12:24:15PM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 10:43 -0500, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote: > > On Sun, 2007-02-25 at 21:31 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote: > > > Andrej Kacian wrote: > > > > It makes sense slowly removing *applications* depending on gtk1. Themes > > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Missing: Universal-CD - Gentoo discriminates shell and networkless users

2006-10-10 Thread Christian Birchinger
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 10:13:41AM +, Duncan wrote: > Personally, I'd say 686 is the lowest reasonable to support at this point. > Below that, try an appropriate binary distribution and save the days/weeks > of compiling. Of course, Gentoo is highly customizable, and folks could > try it on 38

Re: [gentoo-dev] Xmms needs to die.

2006-08-25 Thread Christian Birchinger
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 03:53:09PM +0200, Robert Cernansky wrote: > Unfortunatelly this is something different. xmm-pipe lets you control > running xmms from commandline (thus binding these commands to > keys). It allows control volume, skipping in current track (fast > forward), do some playlist a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Project Sunrise thread -- a try of clarification

2006-06-11 Thread Christian Birchinger
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 02:04:57PM +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote: > > "svn co http://overlays.gentoo.org/svn/proj/sunrise/category/application"; > "emerge application" > As long as it's made for pulling single ebuilds (and their support files), i think it's really helpfull. It's exactly the same

Re: [gentoo-dev] Paludis and Profiles

2006-05-17 Thread Christian Birchinger
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 10:53:47PM +0200, Wernfried Haas wrote: > On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 11:13:16PM +0200, Christian Birchinger wrote: > > Then you remove the profile just like you would remove any piece > > of software where the license is unacceptable. > > Please look a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Paludis and Profiles

2006-05-17 Thread Christian Birchinger
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 08:11:57PM +0200, Wernfried Haas wrote: > On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 06:32:38PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > That's not the point as i wasn't talking about single developers but > Gentoo as an organisation. Paludis is not in any way under Gentoo's > control. If the paludi

Re: [gentoo-dev] Paludis and Profiles

2006-05-17 Thread Christian Birchinger
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 05:54:36PM +0200, Christian Hartmann wrote: > > Not realistic. It means that any new package manager can't do anything > > new. I'd also like to point out that you can't upgrade to a new Portage > > version, install some things, downgrade to an older Portage version and > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Paludis and Profiles

2006-05-17 Thread Christian Birchinger
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 01:42:53AM +0100, Stephen Bennett wrote: > OK, since several people have asked what is going to be in this profile > if it gets added, i had in mind something like the following (all > filenames relative to gentoo-x86/profiles/): > > paludis/deprecated: > # DO NOT USE THIS

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP ??: Critical News Reporting

2005-11-01 Thread Christian Birchinger
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 02:54:51PM +0100, Andrej Kacian wrote: > On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 01:51:25 + > Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The attached GLEP is a draft proposal for the emerge --news thing that's > > been under discussion. There are still some TODO items. These are calls

Re: [gentoo-dev] New global USE flag: logrotate

2005-04-29 Thread Christian Birchinger
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 05:18:07PM -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote: > As an aside, my preference would be to install them by default, but > allow a nologrotate equivalent to "nodoc", "noinfo", or "noman". That > would require hacking portage, though, which seems silly for something > so trivial. Does