Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Change mail-mta/msmtp to be the default in virtual/mta instead of mail-mta/ssmtp ?

2012-03-13 Thread Christian Birchinger
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 08:20:08PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote: On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:07:48PM +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote: ssmtp has been quiet project for quite a while, where as msmtp is maintained one. sure, ssmtp might be just mature, but msmtp is equally small and has

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: media-plugins/audacious-xosd

2010-09-11 Thread Christian Birchinger
# Christian Birchinger jo...@gentoo.org (11 Sep 2010) # Masked for removal in 30 days. Doesn't work # with recent Audacious and the included ghosd # plugin is a perfect replacment. media-plugins/audacious-xosd

Re: [gentoo-dev] SDLMame maintainer with Gnome setup wanted

2008-07-26 Thread Christian Birchinger
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 11:07:10PM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote: Christian Birchinger wrote: Hello Anyone interested in maintaining further SDLMame updates? Beginning with 0.126 it requires GConf to get a font setting for it's now mandatory debugger. I use a plain XFCE setup and don't really

[gentoo-dev] SDLMame maintainer with Gnome setup wanted

2008-07-24 Thread Christian Birchinger
Hello Anyone interested in maintaining further SDLMame updates? Beginning with 0.126 it requires GConf to get a font setting for it's now mandatory debugger. I use a plain XFCE setup and don't really want to install stuff like Orbit and GConf etc. My patch to have GConf optional was rejected by

Re: [gentoo-dev] stripping out the DO NOT REPLY from bugzie emails

2007-09-30 Thread Christian Birchinger
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 06:31:06PM -0500, Andrew Gaffney wrote: It seems that not everybody loves the new DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL header at the top of every bugzie email as much as robbat2 does. Because of that, robbat2, KingTaco, and I came up with a procmail recipe that uses sed to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Firefox 1.5 series will get removed in 30 days

2007-03-29 Thread Christian Birchinger
On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 05:03:37PM +0100, Raúl Porcel wrote: Hi, The mozilla team has decided that the www-client/mozilla-firefox[-bin]-1.5* series will get masked two weeks from now (18 Mar 2007), that is 1 April 2007. And will be removed after two weeks from that date, which will be 15 April

Re: [gentoo-dev] Firefox 1.5 series will get removed in 30 days

2007-03-29 Thread Christian Birchinger
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 12:23:49PM +0300, Petteri Räty wrote: If you read what you are quoting: Mozilla will drop support for that series from 24 April 2007 onwards. That's still almost a month + the time no security issues appear. This would be still better. Christian --

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: What do you think about removing gtk-1.2 theme engines from tree?

2007-02-28 Thread Christian Birchinger
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 12:24:15PM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote: On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 10:43 -0500, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote: On Sun, 2007-02-25 at 21:31 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote: Andrej Kacian wrote: It makes sense slowly removing *applications* depending on gtk1. Themes should

Re: [gentoo-dev] Xmms needs to die.

2006-08-25 Thread Christian Birchinger
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 03:53:09PM +0200, Robert Cernansky wrote: Unfortunatelly this is something different. xmm-pipe lets you control running xmms from commandline (thus binding these commands to keys). It allows control volume, skipping in current track (fast forward), do some playlist

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Project Sunrise thread -- a try of clarification

2006-06-11 Thread Christian Birchinger
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 02:04:57PM +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote: svn co http://overlays.gentoo.org/svn/proj/sunrise/category/application; emerge application As long as it's made for pulling single ebuilds (and their support files), i think it's really helpfull. It's exactly the same as

Re: [gentoo-dev] Paludis and Profiles

2006-05-17 Thread Christian Birchinger
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 01:42:53AM +0100, Stephen Bennett wrote: OK, since several people have asked what is going to be in this profile if it gets added, i had in mind something like the following (all filenames relative to gentoo-x86/profiles/): paludis/deprecated: # DO NOT USE THIS

Re: [gentoo-dev] Paludis and Profiles

2006-05-17 Thread Christian Birchinger
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 05:54:36PM +0200, Christian Hartmann wrote: Not realistic. It means that any new package manager can't do anything new. I'd also like to point out that you can't upgrade to a new Portage version, install some things, downgrade to an older Portage version and expect

Re: [gentoo-dev] Paludis and Profiles

2006-05-17 Thread Christian Birchinger
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 08:11:57PM +0200, Wernfried Haas wrote: On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 06:32:38PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: That's not the point as i wasn't talking about single developers but Gentoo as an organisation. Paludis is not in any way under Gentoo's control. If the paludis

Re: [gentoo-dev] Paludis and Profiles

2006-05-17 Thread Christian Birchinger
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 10:53:47PM +0200, Wernfried Haas wrote: On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 11:13:16PM +0200, Christian Birchinger wrote: Then you remove the profile just like you would remove any piece of software where the license is unacceptable. Please look a bit up in the thread, my point

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP ??: Critical News Reporting

2005-11-01 Thread Christian Birchinger
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 02:54:51PM +0100, Andrej Kacian wrote: On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 01:51:25 + Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The attached GLEP is a draft proposal for the emerge --news thing that's been under discussion. There are still some TODO items. These are calls for