I am announcing the LeechCraft project[1], to replace the old herd in
preparation for the implementation of GLEP 67.
1: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:LeechCraft
11 авг. 2015 г. 17:33 пользователь Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org
написал:
Hello, everyone.
Now that we're officially on git and can officially use pull requests
to provide rapid community interaction, it'd be convenient to have
a little better framework for pinging package maintainers.
2015-05-03 1:30 GMT+03:00 Kent Fredric kentfred...@gmail.com:
On 3 May 2015 at 10:18, Georg Rudoy 0xd34df...@gmail.com wrote:
We have idn or gnutls or python etc USE flags after all, not
support_international_names_in_blah or
allow_secure_news_fetching_in_foo or
2015-04-29 14:27 GMT+03:00 Anthony G. Basile bluen...@gentoo.org:
On 04/28/15 17:52, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Anthony G. Basile bluen...@gentoo.org
wrote:
On 04/26/15 23:21, Duncan wrote:
Diego Elio Pettenò posted on Sun, 26 Apr 2015 17:41:04 +0100 as
Hello. My previous email was sent from the wrong address and it seems it
did not make it into the list. Sending again from the right address...
I'm introducing c++14 use flag to every package in app-leechcraft
catherogy via leechcraft.eclass. I need to put USE description somewhere. I
propose /
2015-04-24 21:56 GMT+03:00 Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 24/04/15 02:42 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 24 Apr 2015 21:12:32 +0300 Maxim Koltsov
maksbo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hello. My previous email was sent from the wrong address
2014-08-17 22:38 GMT+04:00 Davide Pesavento p...@gentoo.org:
Hi guys,
In preparation for moving Qt5 to gentoo-x86 (finally!), please review
the attached eclass that is inherited by every Qt5 ebuild.
If you want to get an idea about how the ebuild code looks like, see
any ebuild in the
2014-08-14 23:58 GMT+04:00 Brian Evans grkni...@gentoo.org:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Title: MySQL 5.5 upgrade procedures
Author: Brian Evans grkni...@gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Posted: 2014-08-14
Revision: 1
News-Item-Format: 1.0
Display-If-Installed:
2014-07-21 23:29 GMT+04:00 Maxim Kammerer m...@dee.su:
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 9:16 PM, Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'm not against dropping splashutils, but is there an alternative to
creating or managing framebuffer-splash in the tree? fbsplash doesn't
seem to be there (tho
2014-07-08 16:10 GMT+04:00 Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org:
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 7:38 AM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
The games team believes that they're binding. In fact, I recall one of
the team members remarking explicitly that they're going to alter
ebuilds that were
Hello,
Currently there are four open bugs (see comment 2 in bug 490457) about
imagemagick tools causing access violations while trying to open GPU. There
is working solution:
2013/3/6 Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.eu
On 06/03/2013 08:07, Maxim Koltsov wrote:
1) Do you agree with adding new category?
Not really... are you going to add any more packages?
It's very probable, yes. Also I think 60 packages is quite big number,
as we have many categories
2013/3/6 Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.eu:
On 06/03/2013 15:23, Rich Freeman wrote:
Can't say I'm likely to be a leechcraft user, but the original
proposal indicated they were up to 60 now, and had at least 10-20 more
in the works. I don't think a category is unreasonable, and if at
2013/3/6 Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.eu:
On 06/03/2013 16:12, Maxim Koltsov wrote:
So, what have we decided? I'm pretty sure it'll go up to 100 quite soon.
Then go for it. I'd suggest just app-leechcraft
Thanks. Do i have to do anything more that add it to
profiles/categories
Hi,
Currently there are 61 leechcraft packages in tree scattered across several
categories. We propose to move them to one new category to make maintaining
easy as well as rsync --exclude'ing.
So, two questions:
1) Do you agree with adding new category?
2) How should we call it: app-leechcraft,
Hi,
During prefix bootstrap i noticed that strip-flags removes -L and -I
flags from *FLAGS while these flags are essential for prefix
bootstrapping. Therefore i propose a fix for strip-flags function to
make it preserve prefix-related flags. I have attached a patch, please
review it. It works for
2012/6/17 Justin j...@gentoo.org:
On 17.06.2012 14:13, Maxim Koltsov wrote:
Hi,
During prefix bootstrap i noticed that strip-flags removes -L and -I
flags from *FLAGS while these flags are essential for prefix
bootstrapping. Therefore i propose a fix for strip-flags function
2012/6/17 Richard Yao r...@gentoo.org:
On 06/17/2012 09:23 AM, Maxim Koltsov wrote:
Don't tell me that OpenBSD prefix is unsupported, i'm working on
getting it supported.
OpenBSD is listed on the platform matrix, but it has lacked a maintainer
for quite some time:
http://www.gentoo.org
2012/6/17 Justin j...@gentoo.org:
On 17.06.2012 15:23, Maxim Koltsov wrote:
2012/6/17 Justin j...@gentoo.org:
On 17.06.2012 14:13, Maxim Koltsov wrote:
Hi,
During prefix bootstrap i noticed that strip-flags removes -L and -I
flags from *FLAGS while these flags are essential for prefix
2012/6/17 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org:
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 19:03:22 +0400
Maxim Koltsov maksbo...@gentoo.org wrote:
2012/6/17 Justin j...@gentoo.org:
On 17.06.2012 15:23, Maxim Koltsov wrote:
2012/6/17 Justin j...@gentoo.org:
On 17.06.2012 14:13, Maxim Koltsov wrote:
Hi,
During
Hi,
I just installed fresh system on my pc, selected
'default/linux/x86/10.0/desktop' profile and noticed ldap among
default USE flags. Why is that needed? I suppose there are more users
w/o ldap auth on desktops than with it.
So my proposal is to remove it from
2012/5/5 Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org:
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Maxim Koltsov maksbo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi,
I just installed fresh system on my pc, selected
'default/linux/x86/10.0/desktop' profile and noticed ldap among
default USE flags. Why is that needed? I suppose
25 апреля 2012 г. 9:53 пользователь Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org написал:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012, Maxim Koltsov wrote:
We had Paratype fonts in tree for some time (media-fonts/paratype)
with OFL license. Recently they added bold font variant to PTMono font
with their own license [1], but OFL
25 апреля 2012 г. 15:47 пользователь Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org написал:
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012, Maxim Koltsov wrote:
So the question is: can Paratype FreeFont license be added to tree
as /usr/portage/licenses/paratype?
I don't see any reason why it couldn't.
It looks like a simplified
Hi,
We had Paratype fonts in tree for some time (media-fonts/paratype)
with OFL license. Recently they added bold font variant to PTMono font
with their own license [1], but OFL font tarball was left unchanged.
We tried to reach upstream with this question, but as for now no
answer was got.
So the
dev-libs/libestr
slepnoga (andreis.vingrad...@gmail.com) and I take this.
If user is emerging some polkit-requiring package on DE-less system,
it will pull big bunch of KDE, GNOME, etc. pacakges, which is not
desired. Also, nm-applet and others can be set up with localauthority
files, without help of polkit agents. I don't think virtual will solve
this case.
Hi Thomas,
Why EAPI=3 is not supported?
UNOPKG_BINARY=${EPREFIX}/usr/bin/unopkg
On my machine unopkg is at '/usr/lib64/libreoffice/program/unopkg'
(libreoffice-bin), so this can be a problem.
2011/8/29 Tomáš Chvátal scarab...@gentoo.org:
Dne 29.8.2011 09:20, Maxim Koltsov napsal(a):
Hi Thomas,
Why EAPI=3 is not supported?
I think we should always use the latest, and this is probably only way how
to force you lads to do so. Also it saves me from having to do needless ||
die
2011/8/29 Tomáš Chvátal scarab...@gentoo.org:
Dne 29.8.2011 10:24, Maxim Koltsov napsal(a):
No reason, i just like backaward compability :)
But this is not backcompat this will be completely new and the packages that
will be added never were in main tree :-)
Oh yes, you're right. I just
2011/8/18 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org:
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 14:38:01 +0400
Maxim Koltsov maksbo...@gentoo.org wrote:
0|1) die EAPI not supported, bug ebuild mantainer ;;
*) die Unknown EAPI, Bug eclass maintainers. ;;
I think I already mentioned that. Keep consistent case
2011/8/18 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org:
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 19:30:29 +0400
Maxim Koltsov maksbo...@gentoo.org wrote:
if [ ${LEECHCRAFT_PACKAGE_CATEGORY+x} != x ]; then
CMAKE_USE_DIR=${S}/src/plugins/${LEECHCRAFT_PACKAGE_CATEGORY}/${PN#leechcraft-}
elif [ ${PN} != leechcraft-core
Hi devs,
I'm about to add Leechcraft modular internet client to tree. It has 32
packages and uses it's own eclass. Please review it and allow me to
commit it to the tree.
Also i'd want to ask: is it woth to add new category (e.g.
leechcraft-plugins) to simplify managing leechcraft ebuilds. And the
Sorry, forgot the eclass. Attaching it here...
P.S. Email of author: 0xd34df...@gmail.com
leechcraft.eclass
Description: Binary data
Hi devs,
I got a request to add Leechcraft (http://leechcraft.org/) to the
portage tree. Leechcraft is modular internet client with many plugins.
Main problem with it is that it has very few (less than 5, i suppose)
active maintainers, and is needed by very limited amount of users
(mainly friends
2011/5/2 Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org:
i dont think so. i cant see RDEPENDing on a random tftp server being
terribly useful here, and it certainly isnt a requirement. elog it
and be done.
-mike
Ok, please take a look at net-misc/ris-linux. It's used for network
installing windows,
Hi,
Assuming we have a package, that want to have any tftp server on
system, no matter which one exactly, what must we set in DEPEND? I
think creating virtual for tftp server would be nice.
Maxim
I'm going to add such a package to the tree tomorrow,
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=365605. Can you write ebuild
for this virtual, because i'm not familliar with new-style virtuals
yet?
2011/5/2 Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com:
If it doesn't care about what the tftp server is, presumably that means
that the package itself doesn't actually use the tftp server (and if
it did call the tftp server, it would need to know the syntax for each
individual package, so it
Are you planning to move to modular boost? I mean, separate ebuild for
boost-filesystem, boost-spirit, etc.
Maxim.
40 matches
Mail list logo
