[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-irc/inspircd: ChangeLog inspircd-1.1.14.ebuild

2007-11-12 Thread Michael Hanselmann
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 02:09:33PM -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote: On 21:47 Mon 12 Nov , Michael Hanselmann (hansmi) wrote: pkg_postinst() { chown -R inspircd:inspircd ${ROOT}/etc/${PN} chmod 700 ${ROOT}/etc/${PN} chown -R inspircd:inspircd ${ROOT}/var/log/${PN} chmod

Re: [gentoo-dev] Slapd calls nss_ldap before opening its ports

2007-10-22 Thread Michael Hanselmann
Hi On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 02:12:29PM +0200, Bertram Scharpf wrote: Therefore I suppose the slapd daemon tries to obtain passwd/shadow information for ldap via nss_ldap. Yes, it does. Therefore, use something like the following line in /etc/ldap.conf: nss_initgroups_ignoreusers

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] qmail.eclass draft

2007-07-30 Thread Michael Hanselmann
On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 01:20:43PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote: Well, i think the unpack stuff could be handled in the ebuild, but i'd still like to keep dospp, so ebuilds like vpopmail can install spp-plugins in a standardized way.. dospp is fine. Well, maybe rename it to doqmail-spp to make

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] qmail.eclass draft

2007-07-30 Thread Michael Hanselmann
On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 04:51:17PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote: Yep. Maybe it is also a good idea to make a stand-alone ebuild for the qmail-spp plugins in the tarball i have collected, cleaned up and tested so far, so we do not need to handle that in the qmail ebuilds..? That's a great idea.

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] qmail.eclass draft

2007-07-27 Thread Michael Hanselmann
Hello Benedikt Sorry for my long response times. On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 09:58:17PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote: i thought about this, but i'd really like to see things like qmail-spp and the gentoo qmail tarball be handled by the eclass, on the other hand i agree that unpacking netqmail or

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] qmail.eclass draft

2007-07-20 Thread Michael Hanselmann
Hello Benedikt On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 01:37:11PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote: It is basically netqmail split into much smaller chunks so they can be reused by other qmail variants as well. Okay, I looked through it and found some things which need reconsideration. I agree that user creation

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] qmail.eclass draft

2007-07-20 Thread Michael Hanselmann
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 10:05:23PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote: qmail_base_install should be split in smaller functions, maybe with callbacks (if possible in bash). There is now qmail_mini_install (called by every qmail ebuild) and qmail_{full,man,sendmail}_install for the rest of a full

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] qmail.eclass draft

2007-07-15 Thread Michael Hanselmann
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 03:07:28AM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote: As it seems, you do not have the time and/or interest to cleanup the qmail mess, but don't want anyone to touch (net)qmail ebuilds either, i have put the updated ebuilds for qmail and friends into my overlay. [1] You interpret

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] qmail.eclass draft

2007-07-14 Thread Michael Hanselmann
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 05:37:16PM +0300, Petteri Räty wrote: We are all required to subscribe to this mailing list... Should be easy enough to spot the thread. You know, sometimes I get tired of all the flames and pointless discussions and mark all mails as read. If something should be read by

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] qmail.eclass draft

2007-07-14 Thread Michael Hanselmann
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 07:05:51PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote: Actually i am qmail maintainer and also been in the qmail herd for quite some time... No, actually you're in the qmail herd and maintainer of the net-mail/qmail-ldap package. This doesn't make you a netqmail (the package I care

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] qmail.eclass draft

2007-07-14 Thread Michael Hanselmann
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 03:04:27PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote: qmail-ldap will not be removed for sure, since i maintain it currently. Okay, my status there was outdated. We were at least discussing it at some point in history. And as the netqmail ebuild maintainer, I want the ebuild to be

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] qmail.eclass draft

2007-07-14 Thread Michael Hanselmann
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 11:22:47AM -0400, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: It seems like you aren't interested in communication with the maintainer, otherwise you would've CC'ed me. Erm? This was completely uncalled for, I'd say?! To Jakub: It was. Sending such things to a public list is

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] qmail.eclass draft

2007-07-13 Thread Michael Hanselmann
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 01:37:11PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote: due to massive code duplication in netqmail, qmail-ldap, qmail-mysql, mini-qmail and other 3-rd party applications for qmail i have started to move functionality into a first qmail.eclass draft. I already proposed moving the prime

Re: [gentoo-dev] Pre-Last Rites: net-irc/bitchx

2007-07-05 Thread Michael Hanselmann
Hi Luca On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 01:14:00PM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote: Workalike client suggested? After using BitchX for several years, I switch to irssi like 2.5 years ago. It felt like the most similar client, altough they're a bit different. Greets, Michael -- http://hansmi.ch/

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo's problems

2007-03-14 Thread Michael Hanselmann
Hello Alec On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 02:41:10PM -0700, Alec Warner wrote: 11:16:24 @genstef hansmi: bah fix your qa stuff yourself if you think I am wrong. I wont do something I dont agree with I would like to also point out that your quoted irc snippet is very weak as there is no

Re: [gentoo-dev] Some council topics for March meeting

2007-03-04 Thread Michael Hanselmann
Hello Daniel On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 10:32:40AM -0700, Daniel Robbins wrote: If people are truly concerned about productivity, then I would expect them to support it. To me it seems that you aren't concerned about productivity, otherwise you wouldn't top-post. Please stop doing it and learn

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: What's the use of mozilla-launcher?

2006-11-13 Thread Michael Hanselmann
Hello Alexander On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 04:13:07PM +0100, Alexander Skwar wrote: ) is not a valid character in a URL, though - or is it? According to RFC2396[1], it is: 2.3. Unreserved Characters Data characters that are allowed in a URI but do not have a reserved purpose are called

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ignoring/overwriting IUSE from an eclass

2006-10-30 Thread Michael Hanselmann
Hello Piotr On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 09:40:28PM +0100, Piotr Jaroszyński wrote: E_IUSE=${E_IUSE// X } - deletes every X with whitespace around it. What happens if someone uses newlines, horizontal tabs, vertical tabs or any other whitespace character instead of spaces? Boom. Greets, Michael --

Re: [gentoo-dev] Eclass for prime numbers

2006-02-12 Thread Michael Hanselmann
Hello Patrick On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 06:42:01PM +0100, Patrick Lauer wrote: In what range do you need the random numbers? For this ebuild, lower than 1000. And I guess a 32-bit prime is out of reach :-) Indeed. Greets, Michael -- Gentoo Linux developer, http://hansmi.ch/,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Eclass for prime numbers

2006-02-12 Thread Michael Hanselmann
Hello On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 06:22:00PM +0100, Michael Hanselmann wrote: [prime.eclass] After discussing it with Simon Stelling (blubb), I decided to put the code into the ebuild directly for now. Since this is experimental stuff, that's no problem for now. The code will be moved to an eclass

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-nds/gq

2006-02-10 Thread Michael Hanselmann
Hello Jakub On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 10:33:52AM +0100, Jakub Moc wrote: GTK-based LDAP client. This thing has no maintainer, is broken and dead upstream (unmaintained, last release 2+ ago). I don't think it makes huge sense to keep it, even if it worked for me for the last three years or so.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Anyone still maintaining dev-libs/dietlibc ?

2006-01-06 Thread Michael Hanselmann
Hello Christian On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 10:13:39PM +0100, Christian Heim wrote: devs who contributed/touched the ebuilds: - Michael Hanselmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] If no one complains, I'll take this package. I don't mind if you do that. Greets, Michael -- Gentoo Linux Developer using

Re: [gentoo-dev] USE=minimal for kernel sources

2005-09-05 Thread Michael Hanselmann
Hello The stuff I removed: arch/* except i386 and x86_64 include/asm-* expect asm-generic, asm-i386 and asm-x86_64 So I propose we implement a minimal USE flag in the kernel-2 eclass that would make the cleaning [...| The idea isn't too bad, but if you implement it, please do it in a cross

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Treewide metadata.xml

2005-05-27 Thread Michael Hanselmann
Hello Danny Let's keep the metadata.xml in each package's directory in _CVS only_. Don't propagate them via rsync. Instead, use a script to compile all metadata.xml files into one central (XML) file. (This would probably need slight changes to the DTD). This file would then be placed into

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: metadata cleaning

2005-04-20 Thread Michael Hanselmann
Hello app-doc/djbdns-man net-dns/djbdns net-nds/directoryadministrator I'll look into taking over these if nobody else steps up. Greets, Michael -- Gentoo Linux Developer using m0n0wall | http://hansmi.ch/ Hackers of the world, unite! pgpF0WY1CFuyU.pgp Description: PGP signature