On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 03:04:27PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote: > qmail-ldap will not be removed for sure, since i maintain it currently.
Okay, my status there was outdated. We were at least discussing it at some point in history. > > And as the netqmail ebuild maintainer, I want the ebuild to be as > > simple as possible, that is, no external dependencies where possible. > so, you suggest it is a better way to duplicate tons of code in 4 > ebuilds? I'll think about it. > appearantly, you are subscribed to gentoo-dev. … which doesn't necessarily mean I read it. > On a sidenote, qmail has a huge amount of open bugs, and has generally > gotten no love in the past time, so i wonder if it actually was/is > maintained. qmail != netqmail. To my knowledge, we have only one outstanding bug there, the one with man pages colliding, nothing critical. Since I also have other things in life with higher priorities than Gentoo, it has to wait. However, I should get to it during the week or at latest two weeks. Greets, Michael -- http://hansmi.ch/
pgpI6401kiaE1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
