On 09/29/2018 10:52 AM, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
> On 2018-09-29 15:14, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
>> Please:
>>
>> 0a) Explain to me how to fix my commits that I now can't push, or
>
> Like you have already figured out, "git commit --signoff" when doing
> profile/eclass changes and to fix things, "gi
On 09/29/2018 09:29 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 9:25 AM Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
>>
>> Some kind of repoman support would make this much easier to handle. As
>> it is, doing this by hand for the trivial case (only my own changes)
>> is a PITA. repoman could grow some kind of --
On 08/28/2018 10:32 AM, Alexander Trotsenko wrote:
> Hello, guys!
>
> I tried asking this question in #gentoo-proxy-maint IRC and I was told I
> should venture for gentoo-dev mailing list.
>
> So I introduced a new package into Gentoo, Authenticator
> (https://github.com/bilelmoussaoui/Authentica
On 07/10/2018 09:44 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 9:38 AM kuzetsa wrote:
>>
>> I think authorship is a good point / distinction, Mart.
>>
>> Authorship was never shown in dev-timeline for addresses
>> which aren't @gentoo.org anyway. That
On 07/09/2018 06:29 AM, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> Ühel kenal päeval, E, 09.07.2018 kell 10:40, kirjutas Michał Górny:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We currently don't enforce any particular standard for e-mail
>> addresses
>> for developers committing to gentoo.git. FWICS, the majority of
>> developers is using their
On 03/26/2018 09:26 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 9:19 PM, kuzetsa wrote:
>> On 03/20/2018 08:08 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Actually, I think it is more of a technical constraint. It is
>>> basically impossible to blacklist
On 03/20/2018 08:08 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 7:54 PM, Benda Xu wrote:
>> William Hubbs writes:
>>
>>> I do feel that this decision reflects badly on us as a community and
>>> should be reversed immediately. The proper way to deal with people who
>>> have bad behavior is t
;ghc'.
it gets tricky when there's no good way to even fetch
the source, I mean. Sorry about not proofreading:
On 03/08/2018 09:47 AM, kuzetsa wrote:
> dependencies which can't otherwise be satisfied is the
> point of the original poster / creator of this thread:
I'm
On 03/08/2018 07:25 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 03/08/2018 12:54 AM, Benda Xu wrote:
>>
>> This title itself is amusing enough
>>
>> Motherfuckers need package management
>>
>
> Which if it is not clear, is intended to be funny.
>
>
the colorful language was proportional to the enthusias
From freenode / #gentoo-proxy-maint
[09:13:53] do I need to reply to the gentoo-dev ML to
be able to proxy-maintain games-engines/love or can I just fire
off the github PR with commits for EAPI 6, version bump, etc.
(it's not up to date & being dropped by current maintainer)
Resolution: It
On 01/10/2018 09:55 AM, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
> On 10/01/18 08:55, Lars Wendler wrote:
>> Seems we're turning into an elitist club or something...
> Gentoo has already had the reputation of being an elitist club for
> years. As such I'd like to see steps to remedy this status, rather than
> ta
On 01/09/2018 08:21 AM, Aaron Bauman wrote:
>
> On January 8, 2018 9:39:47 PM EST, Benda Xu wrote:
>> Hi kuzetsa,
>>
>> kuzetsa writes:
>>
>>> The term "beyond" feels wrong & confusing.
>>> (Not sure what to replace it with though)
On 01/10/2018 05:57 AM, David Seifert wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-01-10 at 08:55 +0100, Lars Wendler wrote:
>> On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 08:48:56 +0300 Eray Aslan wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 10:20:56PM +0100, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
* Posting to the list will only be possible to Gentoo develop
On 01/08/2018 01:38 AM, Benda Xu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to introduce some 17.0 profile for Prefix. It also
> introduces separate profiles to support different ranges of linux
> kernels.
>
> | name | linux| glibc |
> |--+--+
On 01/06/2018 05:05 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> On Sat, 6 Jan 2018, Duncan wrote:
>> $ equery b news.eselect
>> app-admin/eselect-1.4.10 (/usr/share/eselect/modules/news.eselect)
>> So in that case it's not the PM, but eselect.
> In fact, it is the PM that would do the filtering, before fil
On 01/03/2018 06:07 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> On Tue, 2 Jan 2018, Alec Warner wrote:
>> Problem:
>> New stages have numerous news items listed that are likely not
>> relevant, but are shown due to limitations in the filtering in NEWS
>> items. E.g. on a recent stage3:
>> [...]
> We could add
On 01/03/2018 05:53 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> W dniu wto, 02.01.2018 o godzinie 19∶13 -0500, użytkownik Alec Warner
> napisał:
>> Problem:
>>
>> New stages have numerous news items listed that are likely not relevant,
>> but are shown due to limitations in the filtering in NEWS items. E.g. on a
>>
On 12/20/2017 06:17 PM, Nils Freydank wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 20. Dezember 2017, 17:48:54 CET schrieb kuzetsa:
>> On 12/16/2017 10:14 AM, Nils Freydank wrote:
>>> Am Dienstag, 5. Dezember 2017, 23:41:45 CET schrieb kuzetsa:
>>>> On 12/05/2017 05:18 PM, Nils Freyda
On 12/16/2017 10:14 AM, Nils Freydank wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 5. Dezember 2017, 23:41:45 CET schrieb kuzetsa:
>> On 12/05/2017 05:18 PM, Nils Freydank wrote:
>>> 5. Reasons for warnings and bans
>>>
>> --snip--
>>
>>>
Neat. I didn't spot those new fbreader feature(s).
I also didn't notice m-n status on fbreader deps.
I'll review this thread, research upstream(s), etc.
(if it's within my abilities & available time, I'll maint)
- kuzetsa
P.S. yes: at times, QA messages are a ta
ese discussions happen, remarks about
various actions by specific people tends to escalate
hostility. On the other hand, generalizations about
how gentoo-related communication should occur isn't
a "shots fired" or "touchy subject" situation.
TL;DR - Public fightin
On 12/05/2017 06:12 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 5:41 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>>
>> We do not, but that presumes actual abuse has been demonstrated.
>> "spamming the mailing list", where the posts are regarding Gentoo, isn't
>> automatically abuse because some people
On 12/05/2017 05:18 PM, Nils Freydank wrote:
> 5. Reasons for warnings and bans
>
--snip--
> c) spamming, i.e. flooding discussions with lots of messages in a row
> d) constant postings off topic, i.e. disrupting discussions with unrelated
> questions
> (co
On 12/02/2017 06:18 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> II. This practically assumes that every new mailing list subscriber will
> be able to recognize the problem. Otherwise, new people will repeatedly
> be lured into discussing with them.
>
> III. In the end, it puts Gentoo in a bad position. Firstly, bec
On 12/04/2017 01:51 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 13:15:32 +
> "M. J. Everitt" wrote:
>
>> On 04/12/17 00:37, Matt Turner wrote:
>>> A user requested I forward this information to the mailing list:
>>>
>>> http://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Publication%20Files/16-057_d45c0b4f-
On 12/04/2017 01:11 PM, Christopher Head wrote:
> On December 3, 2017 1:35:23 PM PST, "Michał Górny" wrote:
>> The best way to reach specific Gentoo developers is through Bugzilla.
>> This gives the best chance for focused discussion on the specific issue
>> without unnecessary distraction for oth
On 12/03/2017 08:19 PM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> this 18 min talk by Donnie Berkholz from 2012, about Gentoo actually:
Someone in private linked that video to me today. Yeah :(
> Do not tolerate bad behavior by anyone!
--snip--
> It is important to take action which clearly rejects
> unacceptable b
On 12/03/2017 07:51 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 7:37 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
>> With gentoo being a non-profit organization, an alternative way to
>> view it could be the trade-off of seeing developers / maintainers /
>> staff leave
> It isn't just the risk of leaving, but the
More than zero posts on this thread are consistent with this point:
On 12/02/2017 06:18 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> 3. Support requests. Some of our 'expert users' have been abusing
> the mailing lists to request support (because it's easier to ask
> everyone than go through proper channels) and/or
1 / 1b seems reasonable for mitigating signal/noise issues.
(previously unaware non-dev subscribers //currently// could post)
On 12/02/2017 06:18 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> ...establish the following changes to the mailing lists:
>
> 1. Posting to gentoo-dev@ and gentoo-project@ mailing lists wil
30 matches
Mail list logo