Re: [gentoo-dev] Building custom package for multi-arch/system

2010-01-30 Thread Bertrand Jacquin
D'ar yaou 28 a viz Genver 2010 e 23 eur 31, « Robin H. Johnson » he deus skrivet : On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 04:17:41PM +0100, Beber wrote: So, I did a wrapper to emerge --buildpkg to create tbz2 with SHA1 in names function of USE, like : CHOST=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu

Re: [gentoo-dev] Building custom package for multi-arch/system

2010-01-30 Thread Bertrand Jacquin
D'ar gwener 29 a viz Genver 2010 e 00 eur 23, « Philipp Riegger » he deus skrivet : On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:17:41 +0100 Beber be...@meleeweb.net wrote: So, I did a wrapper to emerge --buildpkg to create tbz2 with SHA1 in names function of USE, like : CHOST=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu

Re: [gentoo-dev] Building custom package for multi-arch/system

2010-01-30 Thread Zac Medico
On 01/28/2010 09:24 PM, Max Arnold wrote: On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 04:17:41PM +0100, Beber wrote: So, do you guys plan to implement a such thing ? That's one of the features that is mostly missing imho. The principal miss in on client side as I have tools to manage packages but would like to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Building custom package for multi-arch/system

2010-01-30 Thread Max Arnold
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 03:59:27AM -0800, Zac Medico wrote: On 01/28/2010 09:24 PM, Max Arnold wrote: On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 04:17:41PM +0100, Beber wrote: So, do you guys plan to implement a such thing ? That's one of the features that is mostly missing imho. The principal miss in on

Re: [gentoo-dev] Building custom package for multi-arch/system

2010-01-30 Thread Jacob Godserv
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 10:13, Max Arnold lwa...@gmail.com wrote: Can someone share his experience of using Catalyst or Metro as generator of binary package updates for precompiled client machines?  How smooth it is in the long run? I use metro (wrote a little HOWTO on it:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Building custom package for multi-arch/system

2010-01-29 Thread Antoni Grzymala
Max Arnold dixit (2010-01-29, 12:24): On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 04:17:41PM +0100, Beber wrote: So, do you guys plan to implement a such thing ? That's one of the features that is mostly missing imho. The principal miss in on client side as I have tools to manage packages but would like to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Building custom package for multi-arch/system

2010-01-29 Thread Philipp Riegger
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:31:04 + Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org wrote: But if you built and linked against openssl-0.9.7*, then upgraded to openssl-0.9.8, you can expect breakage. But can't this be kind of ignored and solves the Gentoo way? If the binpkg does not work, don't install it

Re: [gentoo-dev] Building custom package for multi-arch/system

2010-01-29 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:52:40AM +0100, Philipp Riegger wrote: On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:31:04 + Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org wrote: But if you built and linked against openssl-0.9.7*, then upgraded to openssl-0.9.8, you can expect breakage. But can't this be kind of ignored and

Re: [gentoo-dev] Building custom package for multi-arch/system

2010-01-29 Thread Zac Medico
On 01/29/2010 01:44 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: zmedico/portage folk: Can we have a phase during binpkg install, that lets us check ELF linkages before the files get moving to ${ROOT}? Yeah, portage-2.2 has a LinkageMap class that we can use to verify that all the needed sonames are present. --

[gentoo-dev] Building custom package for multi-arch/system

2010-01-28 Thread Beber
Hi, This mail is continuation of a discussion last month on IRC on #gentoo-portage. As I think it's larger than just portage array, here it is. I have one server dedicated for compilation (xm-compile), and many applicative servers (xmred5, lemonhead, etc). Currently I use the --buildpkg on

Re: [gentoo-dev] Building custom package for multi-arch/system

2010-01-28 Thread Jacob Godserv
(I'm not an official developer.) On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:17, Beber be...@meleeweb.net wrote: So, do you guys plan to implement a such thing ? That's one of the features that is mostly missing imho. The principal miss in on client side as I have tools to manage packages but would like to not

Re: [gentoo-dev] Building custom package for multi-arch/system

2010-01-28 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Hi, I have a somewhat similar need and to satisfy it, I'm building packages in a chroot that has all the common packages then one chroot per variation. It's probably nowhere scalable enough for you though and would most likely but much more efficient if package building could be wrapped so that

Re: [gentoo-dev] Building custom package for multi-arch/system

2010-01-28 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 04:17:41PM +0100, Beber wrote: So, I did a wrapper to emerge --buildpkg to create tbz2 with SHA1 in names function of USE, like : CHOST=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=amd64 tcpdump USE=+chroot +ipv6 -ssl -test -samba -smi is placed under

Re: [gentoo-dev] Building custom package for multi-arch/system

2010-01-28 Thread Philipp Riegger
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:17:41 +0100 Beber be...@meleeweb.net wrote: So, I did a wrapper to emerge --buildpkg to create tbz2 with SHA1 in names function of USE, like : CHOST=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=amd64 tcpdump USE=+chroot +ipv6 -ssl -test -samba -smi is placed

Re: [gentoo-dev] Building custom package for multi-arch/system

2010-01-28 Thread Max Arnold
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 04:17:41PM +0100, Beber wrote: So, do you guys plan to implement a such thing ? That's one of the features that is mostly missing imho. The principal miss in on client side as I have tools to manage packages but would like to not have too much specific scripts on client