On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 7:10 AM, Sebastian Pippingwebmas...@hartwork.org wrote:
I would love to see the GLEP on CPE names in metadata.xml discussed,
http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org/msg35155.html
Any guidance on what I need to do to make it happen is very welcome.
Please
This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically
the 2nd Thursday at 2000 UTC / 1600 EST), same bat channel
(#gentoo-council @ irc.freenode.net) !
If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
Mike Frysinger wrote:
If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
Gentoo dev list to see.
I would love to see the GLEP on CPE names in metadata.xml discussed,
This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically
the 2nd Thursday at 2000 UTC / 1600 EST), same bat channel
(#gentoo-council @ irc.freenode.net) !
If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically
the 2nd Thursday at 2000 UTC / 1600 EST), same bat channel
(#gentoo-council @ irc.freenode.net) !
If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
On Wednesday 01 August 2007, Mike Frysinger wrote:
This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically
the 2nd Thursday at 2000 UTC / 1600 EST), same bat channel
(#gentoo-council @ irc.freenode.net) !
as discussed on the gentoo-council list, it'll be postponed a week due to LWE
On 8/14/06, Thierry Carrez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Council will meet on Thursday, August 17, 1900 UTC.
AFAICT agenda is at the moment empty.
Here's something I'd like to see the council address. We've just had
baselayout-1.12 go stable. You might have missed this, because
there's no
Wernfried Haas wrote:
Could you (or someone else) send out the agenda and a second reminder
a short while (e.g. 1-2 days) before the actual meeting. I'd very much
appreciate that, and i guess others may too.
The Council will meet on Thursday, August 17, 1900 UTC.
AFAICT agenda is at the moment
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: MD5
Ned Ludd wrote:
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 08:06 -0500, Lance Albertson wrote:
Ned Ludd wrote:
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 11:21 +0200, Jakub Moc wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically the
2nd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: MD5
Curtis Napier wrote:
Yes indeed it is impressive hardware at a pretty kickass facility :)
I got to chat with the CEO of the company that donated that equipment
and the wait was *more* than worth it. Once it's up and running our
bugzilla will be
Simon Stelling wrote:
I'm not out to blame anybody, but if infra had communicated what the
problem exactly is once they found it out, you wouldn't have ended up
with all those I'm sick and tired of your we're working on it.
Asking people for patience is easy, but it's hard to swallow when
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lance Albertson wrote:
Curtis Napier wrote:
I got to chat with the CEO of the company that donated that equipment
and the wait was *more* than worth it. Once it's up and running our
bugzilla will be rock solid and fast fast fast fast fast for
Here's the question, gnome's bugzilla has over twice as many bugs as
we have, is quite speedy and doesn't seem to suffer from the OOM
killers that our bugzilla has. So what's the difference? Did gnome
just toss hardware at the problem to make it go away or have they done
something to make
Joshua Jackson wrote:
Here's the question, gnome's bugzilla has over twice as many bugs as
we have, is quite speedy and doesn't seem to suffer from the OOM
killers that our bugzilla has. So what's the difference? Did gnome
just toss hardware at the problem to make it go away or have they done
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alec Warner wrote:
In the new system the massive search query will run on the slave system,
and it won't affect people making changes; hoewever there may be soem
delay between data replication from the master to the slave(s), but that
would be
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 11:07:44AM -0700, kashani wrote:
Another technique is to change high transaction tables to Innodb
table format. Innodb is going to be roughly 30% slower than MyISAM for
selects and take up much more space on disk approx 3-5x larger. However it
has row
iWho knows, maybe its worth finding another bug database
app, or even be crazy and write our own for a long term solution.
If we could get a license donated, my vote would be to switch to Atlassian
Jira, http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira. It seems to be gaining
mindshare rather
Matthew Marlowe wrote:
If we could get a license donated, my vote would be to switch to Atlassian
Jira, http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira. It seems to be gaining
mindshare rather quickly, and the company I work for just shelled out $2,400
because they liked it so much more than
On Fri, 04 Aug 2006 16:30:03 -0700 Peter Gordon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Maybe it's just me, but I think that having such a core component of
| the distribution be proprietary is in complete violation of Gentoo's
| Social Contract[1] (if not the letter of it, then its spirit of
| openness). It
Mike Frysinger wrote:
This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically the
2nd Thursday once a month), same bat channel (#gentoo-council @
irc.freenode.net) !
Would like the Council to discuss the current state of Gentoo Bugzilla
[1] and anon CVS/SVN [2].
Thanks.
[1]
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 11:21 +0200, Jakub Moc wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically the
2nd Thursday once a month), same bat channel (#gentoo-council @
irc.freenode.net) !
Would like the Council to discuss the current state of
Ned Ludd wrote:
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 11:21 +0200, Jakub Moc wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically the
2nd Thursday once a month), same bat channel (#gentoo-council @
irc.freenode.net) !
Would like the Council to discuss the current
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 08:06 -0500, Lance Albertson wrote:
Ned Ludd wrote:
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 11:21 +0200, Jakub Moc wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically the
2nd Thursday once a month), same bat channel (#gentoo-council @
Ned Ludd wrote:
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 08:06 -0500, Lance Albertson wrote:
Would like the Council to discuss the current state of Gentoo Bugzilla
[1] and anon CVS/SVN [2].
Please elaborate why you need the council to discuss
ongoing active bugs that are in progress.
Progress? Erm... see
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 16:07 +0200, Jakub Moc wrote:
Ned Ludd wrote:
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 08:06 -0500, Lance Albertson wrote:
Would like the Council to discuss the current state of Gentoo Bugzilla
[1] and anon CVS/SVN [2].
Please elaborate why you need the council to discuss
ongoing
Jakub Moc wrote:
I would also like to know why the council has to be involved since
you've never sent an email to infra specifically asking the same thing
first. Sure makes sense to me that you should ask the group involved
with the work first instead of going to the top.
Because it's been
Ned Ludd wrote:
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 16:07 +0200, Jakub Moc wrote:
Because it's been broken for ages? Because I've asked the same on the
bug I've referred to multiple times, as did quite a few other people,
and the thing is still dead ~3 hours a day? (So uhm, the argument that
infra doesn't
Lance Albertson wrote:
Anyways, if you would like, I can send you an update to the bug every
week until it gets completed.
I'd just love to see this fixed and working, first of all... ;)
My guess (sparing any huge hurdles), is
that we can have the new bugs up by the end of this month.
Jakub Moc wrote:
Broken bugzilla affects every ebuild dev, affects GDP, affects bug
wranglers, affects anyone else who's using it to track outstanding
project issues. How is this continuous borkage not a global issue that
council should discuss?
What is there to discuss? Do you expect them to
No, not really. Just that I'd expect kinda more proactive approach than
the one demonstrated fex. in
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=128588#c29 (and a bit more
flexible approach to other alternatives, such as HW/hosting offers we've
received before) and that have been declined for
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 19:03 +0200, Simon Stelling wrote:
Jakub Moc wrote:
Broken bugzilla affects every ebuild dev, affects GDP, affects bug
wranglers, affects anyone else who's using it to track outstanding
project issues. How is this continuous borkage not a global issue that
council
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 13:20 +, Alec Warner wrote:
No, not really. Just that I'd expect kinda more proactive approach than
the one demonstrated fex. in
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=128588#c29 (and a bit more
flexible approach to other alternatives, such as HW/hosting offers
On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 13:51:55 -0500 Lance Albertson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| There are more constructive ways of finding out the status of a
| problem/solution.
Actually, with that in mind I think the council could be of help here...
The bugs slowdown *is* a serious problem, and Jakub's failing
Alec Warner wrote:
I bet if I was infra I'd be wondering what my options were since:
bugs is a pretty critical part of developing; AND
you can't just host it anywhere; AND
the hardware needed for it to perform is expensive; AND
they did not know what the problem was at first
Yes, its been
Patrick Lauer wrote:
(Note to our sponsors: you rock. Keep on rocking.)
Right now bugs is served from a 2,4Ghz P4 - that's roughly a normal
desktop box from last year.
You have no concept of where the bottle neck is. The webserver hosting
the cgi part isn't being loaded hardly at all. The
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 13:51:55 -0500 Lance Albertson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| There are more constructive ways of finding out the status of a
| problem/solution.
Actually, with that in mind I think the council could be of help here...
The bugs slowdown *is* a serious
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 13:48 -0500, Lance Albertson wrote:
Patrick Lauer wrote:
(Note to our sponsors: you rock. Keep on rocking.)
Right now bugs is served from a 2,4Ghz P4 - that's roughly a normal
desktop box from last year.
You have no concept of where the bottle neck is.
I have
Hi,
On 03/08/06, Lance Albertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You have no concept of where the bottle neck is. The webserver hosting
the cgi part isn't being loaded hardly at all. The database server is a
pretty beefy box, and again, its not so much a specific hardware
limitation, just more a
Chris Bainbridge wrote:
I'm curious what the problem is with bugzilla and it's db
interactions? You're suggesting a specific issue rather than general
db performance issues like fs, io scheduling, raid1, hyperthreads,
etc.?
It's most likely related to Bugzilla using MyISAM tables by default
Chris Bainbridge wrote:
Hi,
On 03/08/06, Lance Albertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You have no concept of where the bottle neck is. The webserver hosting
the cgi part isn't being loaded hardly at all. The database server is a
pretty beefy box, and again, its not so much a specific hardware
kashani wrote:
Chris Bainbridge wrote:
I'm curious what the problem is with bugzilla and it's db
interactions? You're suggesting a specific issue rather than general
db performance issues like fs, io scheduling, raid1, hyperthreads,
etc.?
It's most likely related to Bugzilla using
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 13:48 -0500, Lance Albertson wrote:
Patrick Lauer wrote:
(Note to our sponsors: you rock. Keep on rocking.)
Right now bugs is served from a 2,4Ghz P4 - that's roughly a normal
desktop box from last year.
You have no concept of where the bottle neck is.
I have
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 13:20 +, Alec Warner wrote:
No, not really. Just that I'd expect kinda more proactive approach
than
the one demonstrated fex. in
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=128588#c29 (and a bit more
flexible approach to other alternatives, such as HW/hosting offers
On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 13:51:55 -0500 Lance Albertson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| There are more constructive ways of finding out the status of a
| problem/solution.
Actually, with that in mind I think the council could be of help here...
The bugs slowdown *is* a serious problem, and Jakub's
This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically the
2nd Thursday once a month), same bat channel (#gentoo-council @
irc.freenode.net) !
If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
Gentoo dev
Could you (or someone else) send out the agenda and a second reminder
a short while (e.g. 1-2 days) before the actual meeting. I'd very much
appreciate that, and i guess others may too.
cheers,
Wernfried
PS: I know _i_ could volunteer as i already suggested it, but then we
want someone
46 matches
Mail list logo
