On 10/03/13 20:04, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 12:44:18 +0100
Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
If I remember correctly the damn rule is to put it for 30 days into
testing, and as you said there was no previous version on arm so users
could've reported some issues, i agree that sometimes you h
hasufell posted on Sun, 10 Mar 2013 19:11:52 +0100 as excerpted:
> I was told a while back (I might still have it in irc logs), that 30
> days is NOT a rule. It's common sense, but in the end the maintainer
> decides when to request stabilization, no one else.
I can confirm the 30-day-guideline p
On 03/10/2013 02:11 PM, hasufell wrote:
> On 03/10/2013 07:04 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
>> On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 12:44:18 +0100
>> Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
>>
>>> If I remember correctly the damn rule is to put it for 30 days into
>>> testing, and as you said there was no previous version on arm so users
On 03/10/2013 07:04 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 12:44:18 +0100
> Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
>
>> If I remember correctly the damn rule is to put it for 30 days into
>> testing, and as you said there was no previous version on arm so users
>> could've reported some issues, i agree tha
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 12:44:18 +0100
Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> If I remember correctly the damn rule is to put it for 30 days into
> testing, and as you said there was no previous version on arm so users
> could've reported some issues, i agree that sometimes you have to
> ignore the rules to really fi
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 5:58 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>> Starting as a developer or aspiring to become one with that
>> attitude is not acceptable.
>
> That doesn't make sense to me.
>
> If the reason is good, surely it does not matter who is doing the breaking?
Well ther
Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> Starting as a developer or aspiring to become one with that
> attitude is not acceptable.
That doesn't make sense to me.
If the reason is good, surely it does not matter who is doing the breaking?
//Peter
pgpvkacjjiVYz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Am Montag, 4. März 2013, 03:19:17 schrieb Peter Stuge:
>
> > > Again, I guess you have to make Mike go away now.
> >
> > I never said that so please just stop it.
>
> You threatened to preempt me if I wanted to become a developer and
> found his practise OK - meaning that the behavior is unacceptab
Markos Chandras wrote:
> >> "getting stuff done" is not an answer.
> >
> > it made something easier for him
>
> I asked why he did it, and you keep telling me because he had to.
I'm guessing that it didn't have much to do with Gentoo. Maybe he'll
fill in.
> I am reviewing commits from time to t
On 3 March 2013 12:38, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Markos Chandras wrote:
>> > I explain to you what happened
>>
>> "getting stuff done" is not an answer. I still don't understand why
>> stable keywords had to be added directly. Do you understand why Mike
>> did that or just playing smart here?
>
> To me
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 7:38 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
>
> To me it's obvious that he did it because it made something easier
> for him. By breaking the Gentoo rule he got something done.
Rules exist for a reason. If we're bending them because we're
accomplishing the goal of the rules in a better wa
Markos Chandras wrote:
> > I explain to you what happened
>
> "getting stuff done" is not an answer. I still don't understand why
> stable keywords had to be added directly. Do you understand why Mike
> did that or just playing smart here?
To me it's obvious that he did it because it made somethi
On 3 March 2013 12:01, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Markos Chandras wrote:
>> > > it just feels strange
>> >
>> > I hear they call it "getting stuff done"..
>>
>> good thing you are not a dev then.
>> Thanks for the heads up in case you ever want to become one
>
> I explain to you what happened
"getting
Markos Chandras wrote:
> > > it just feels strange
> >
> > I hear they call it "getting stuff done"..
>
> good thing you are not a dev then.
> Thanks for the heads up in case you ever want to become one
I explain to you what happened and you, a recruiter, proceed to
threaten me in case I want to
If I remember correctly the damn rule is to put it for 30 days into
testing, and as you said there was no previous version on arm so users
could've reported some issues, i agree that sometimes you have to ignore
the rules to really fix stable, but was this such case for sure?
Dne 3.3.2013 3:43 "Mik
On Mar 3, 2013 2:42 AM, "Peter Stuge" wrote:
>
> Markos Chandras wrote:
> > it just feels strange
>
> I hear they call it "getting stuff done"..
>
>
> //Peter
>
good thing you are not a dev then.
Thanks for the heads up in case you ever want to become one
On Saturday 02 March 2013 21:01:39 Markos Chandras wrote:
> On Mar 3, 2013 1:55 AM, "Mike Frysinger" wrote:
> > complain to me when all these arm systems that totally had confuse
> > already installed go down in fire. it literally makes 0 difference
> > here.
>
> Why would they have it installed
Markos Chandras wrote:
> it just feels strange
I hear they call it "getting stuff done"..
//Peter
On Mar 3, 2013 1:55 AM, "Mike Frysinger" wrote:
>
> On Saturday 02 March 2013 20:50:17 Markos Chandras wrote:
> > On Mar 3, 2013 1:43 AM, "Mike Frysinger" wrote:
> > > On Friday 01 March 2013 07:45:28 Markos Chandras wrote:
> > > > On 1 March 2013 08:16, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > > vapier
On Saturday 02 March 2013 20:50:17 Markos Chandras wrote:
> On Mar 3, 2013 1:43 AM, "Mike Frysinger" wrote:
> > On Friday 01 March 2013 07:45:28 Markos Chandras wrote:
> > > On 1 March 2013 08:16, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > vapier 13/03/01 08:16:02
> > > >
> > > > Modified:
On Mar 3, 2013 1:43 AM, "Mike Frysinger" wrote:
>
> On Friday 01 March 2013 07:45:28 Markos Chandras wrote:
> > On 1 March 2013 08:16, Mike Frysinger (vapier)
wrote:
> > > vapier 13/03/01 08:16:02
> > >
> > > Modified: confuse-2.7.ebuild ChangeLog
> > > Log:
> > > Add arm l
On Friday 01 March 2013 07:45:28 Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 1 March 2013 08:16, Mike Frysinger (vapier) wrote:
> > vapier 13/03/01 08:16:02
> >
> > Modified: confuse-2.7.ebuild ChangeLog
> > Log:
> > Add arm lovin.
> >
> > --- confuse-2.7.ebuild 30 Oct 2012 11:18:49 -0
On 1 March 2013 08:16, Mike Frysinger (vapier) wrote:
> vapier 13/03/01 08:16:02
>
> Modified: confuse-2.7.ebuild ChangeLog
> Log:
> Add arm lovin.
>
> (Portage version: 2.2.0_alpha163/cvs/Linux x86_64, signed Manifest commit
> with key FB7C4156)
>
> Revision Changes
23 matches
Mail list logo