On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 05:42:57AM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 11:37 PM, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov
m...@mva.name wrote:
Btw, since Gentoo do not (mostly) provide packages itself, but only build
instructions (ebuild), can't we just ship ebuild that patches openldap
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 11:37 PM, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov
m...@mva.name wrote:
Btw, since Gentoo do not (mostly) provide packages itself, but only build
instructions (ebuild), can't we just ship ebuild that patches openldap
violates to force to use db6=19 with bindist USE?
Can we do it
Btw, since Gentoo do not (mostly) provide packages itself, but only
build instructions (ebuild), can't we just ship ebuild that patches
openldap violates to force to use db6 with bindist USE?
I.e. make user decide to take responsibility for that local license
incompatibility. We're all know,
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 09:04:19PM +, Howard Chu wrote:
Robin H. Johnson (robbat2) wrote:
robbat2 14/10/27 19:15:09
Removed: openldap-2.4.40-db-6.patch
Log:
Upstream OpenLDAP nixes bdb6 functionality.
Not entirely accurate. We didn't nix all of BDB 6 - you
