On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 8:40 PM, Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote:
A bug in an upstream-supported feature is quite different from a
patched-in feature that upstream doesn't support.
Since no maintainer has spoken up here, I filed a bug:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=507210
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/08/2014 02:40 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
Gentoo typically tries to keep patching to a minimum in general. To be
enabling something like this by default seems bad, the fact that it is
openssh compounds that. +1 for removing the + and leaving this
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 11:03 PM, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina
zeroch...@gentoo.org wrote:
Gentoo typically tries to keep patching to a minimum in general. To be
enabling something like this by default seems bad, the fact that it is
openssh compounds that. +1 for removing the + and leaving this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 04/09/2014 05:03 AM, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote:
On 04/08/2014 02:40 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
Gentoo typically tries to keep patching to a minimum in general.
To be enabling something like this by default seems bad, the fact
that it is
On 04/09/2014 10:54, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 11:03 PM, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina
zeroch...@gentoo.org wrote:
Gentoo typically tries to keep patching to a minimum in general. To be
enabling something like this by default seems bad, the fact that it is
openssh compounds that.
W dniu 2014-03-31 19:35, Toralf Förster pisze:
On 03/31/2014 01:15 PM, Alex Xu wrote:
On 31/03/14 03:36 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
So, I'm interested... How widely used is the HPN patch set? Are there
any good indications that it doesn't negatively impact security?
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Marcin Mirosław mar...@mejor.pl wrote:
According to last problem with openssl and +tls-heartbeat I'd like to
see less features enabled by default. USE=-* isn't the best solution;)
A bug in an upstream-supported feature is quite different from a
patched-in
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 11:31 PM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
We have had those debates whether the + should follow upstream
decisions and such. Short answer: the maintainer decides. There is no
consistency for this and there will never be.
That may be true, I still think it behooves
On 31/03/14 03:36 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
So, I'm interested... How widely used is the HPN patch set? Are there
any good indications that it doesn't negatively impact security?
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=292932
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=693424
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/31/2014 01:15 PM, Alex Xu wrote:
On 31/03/14 03:36 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
So, I'm interested... How widely used is the HPN patch set? Are there
any good indications that it doesn't negatively impact security?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
WRT to but 504616 I'd like to address my questions made in
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=504616#c6 to this list again :
Since the Debian debakel with fixing an uninitialized memeory I'm
very skeptical to distribution specific
On 29/03/14 06:07 AM, Toralf Förster wrote:
WRT to but 504616 I'd like to address my questions made in
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=504616#c6 to this list again :
Since the Debian debakel with fixing an uninitialized memeory I'm
very skeptical to distribution specific
On Sat, 29 Mar 2014 07:15:14 -0400
Alex Xu alex_y...@yahoo.ca wrote:
On 29/03/14 06:07 AM, Toralf Förster wrote:
WRT to but 504616 I'd like to address my questions made in
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=504616#c6 to this list
again :
Since the Debian debakel with fixing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/29/2014 08:12 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Sat, 29 Mar 2014 07:15:14 -0400 Alex Xu alex_y...@yahoo.ca
wrote:
On 29/03/14 06:07 AM, Toralf Förster wrote:
WRT to but 504616 I'd like to address my questions made in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Toralf Förster:
On 03/29/2014 08:12 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Sat, 29 Mar 2014 07:15:14 -0400 Alex Xu alex_y...@yahoo.ca
wrote:
On 29/03/14 06:07 AM, Toralf Förster wrote:
WRT to but 504616 I'd like to address my questions made in
15 matches
Mail list logo
