Re: [gentoo-dev] changes to tested bugzilla keyword proposal

2013-01-09 Thread Rich Freeman
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > A lot clearer than a single text field littered with keywords would be some > tick boxes, indeed. In fact, it makes me wonder why we use a half-obscured > list > in a select field for adding/removing arch teams now. Agree - mostly legacy (

Re: [gentoo-dev] changes to tested bugzilla keyword proposal

2013-01-09 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Wed, 9 Jan 2013 18:39:09 +0200 Markos Chandras wrote: > On 9 January 2013 18:17, Vicente Olivert Riera > > some devs and I were talking about the fact that TESTED bugzilla > > keyword may need a change on his description, or, maybe it's needed > > to create new TESTED_${ARCH} keywords. > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] changes to tested bugzilla keyword proposal

2013-01-09 Thread Markos Chandras
On 9 January 2013 18:17, Vicente Olivert Riera wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hello everyone :-) > > some devs and I were talking about the fact that TESTED bugzilla > keyword may need a change on his description, or, maybe it's needed to > create new TESTED_${ARCH} k

[gentoo-dev] changes to tested bugzilla keyword proposal

2013-01-09 Thread Vicente Olivert Riera
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello everyone :-) some devs and I were talking about the fact that TESTED bugzilla keyword may need a change on his description, or, maybe it's needed to create new TESTED_${ARCH} keywords. Personally, I was using TESTED keyword when an ebuild was t