On 10/22/2013 09:48 AM, Sergey Popov wrote:
> 20.10.2013 18:31, hasufell пишет:
>> Gamerlay is not related to the games team
>
> I am sorry, but it is games team not related to gamerlay. No offense,
> but gamerlay guys sometims just do their job.
>
> So, MAKE it related to Games team and fix stuf
On 10/22/2013 09:54 AM, Sergey Popov wrote:
> 20.10.2013 20:12, hasufell пишет:
>> This thread is derailed and I have no further interest in discussing here.
>>
>
> And again, no offense, but it is not the first time when you are jumped,
> said, "Everything in X is wrong!" and then said "I have lo
On Tue, 22 Oct 2013 04:10:36 +0200
Peter Stuge wrote:
> Tom Wijsman wrote:
> > There is an alternative solution here; and that is to bring reviewed
> > versions of them to the Portage tree or official games repository,
> > and honor their contributions. That is a win-win situation for both
> > of
20.10.2013 20:12, hasufell пишет:
> This thread is derailed and I have no further interest in discussing here.
>
And again, no offense, but it is not the first time when you are jumped,
said, "Everything in X is wrong!" and then said "I have lost interest".
It is very "mature" position to propose
20.10.2013 19:22, hasufell пишет:
> I am not sure if you have read my list of arguments in the first post.
> Sunrise is based on that very concept. No user has direct commit
> access to the reviewed repository, for good reason (not sure what you
> mean with "developer-only").
>
So, what's the pro
20.10.2013 18:31, hasufell пишет:
> Gamerlay is not related to the games team
I am sorry, but it is games team not related to gamerlay. No offense,
but gamerlay guys sometims just do their job.
So, MAKE it related to Games team and fix stuff, considered broken.
> gamerlay which is a project that
Rich Freeman wrote:
> >> This is not a great way to invite more users to participate. If you
> >> intend to make the game overlay and team a developer-only thing you
> >> are doing a great work.
> >
> > Everything in the Gentoo project is per definition strictly
> > developer-only. I suppose that i
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 9:53 PM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Markos,
>
> Markos Chandras wrote:
>> This is not a great way to invite more users to participate. If you
>> intend to make the game overlay and team a developer-only thing you
>> are doing a great work.
>
> Everything in the Gentoo project is
Tom Wijsman wrote:
> There is an alternative solution here; and that is to bring reviewed
> versions of them to the Portage tree or official games repository, and
> honor their contributions. That is a win-win situation for both of you.
I'm afraid that's too naive. :\
I have significant experienc
Markos,
Markos Chandras wrote:
> This is not a great way to invite more users to participate. If you
> intend to make the game overlay and team a developer-only thing you
> are doing a great work.
Everything in the Gentoo project is per definition strictly
developer-only. I suppose that it's a fu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 20 Oct 2013 17:22:24 +0200
hasufell wrote:
> I personally would propose the standard github way.
>
> The only thing that still bothers me about that is that there is no
> automatic way of doing a "repoman full" check, like the travis hooks
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 20 Oct 2013 18:12:39 +0200
hasufell wrote:
> This thread is derailed ...
The argument << deprecate repositories like "gamerlay" which do not
undergo any kind of review and have low quality >> you gave causes a sub
thread that tests the reali
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/20/2013 06:52 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 20. Oktober 2013, 18:12:39 schrieb hasufell:
>> This thread is derailed and I have no further interest in
>> discussing here.
>
> Well maybe others do now?
>
> http://cdn.meme.li/i/p77qn
Am Sonntag, 20. Oktober 2013, 18:12:39 schrieb hasufell:
> This thread is derailed and I have no further interest in discussing here.
Well maybe others do now?
http://cdn.meme.li/i/p77qn.jpg
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer
dilfri...@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This thread is derailed and I have no further interest in discussing here.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSZAD3AAoJEFpvPKfnPDWztwMIAKT0q2
> Some people from gamerlay have made clear that they are not really
> interested in reviews, yet you want me to waste time on that?
I bet, you misunderstand that position. It is a big difference between «users
is not interested in review» and «users is not interested to follow the way
like «som
On 10/20/2013 05:04 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 11:40 AM, hasufell wrote:
>> On 10/20/2013 05:26 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>>> On 10/20/2013 04:22 PM, hasufell wrote:
On 10/20/2013 04:40 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 10/20/2013 03:31 PM, hasufell wrote:
>> On
On 10/20/2013 04:40 PM, hasufell wrote:
>
> Some people from gamerlay have made clear that they are not really
> interested in reviews, yet you want me to waste time on that?
A guy asked you why you don't work in the gamerlay. All you said was
that gamerlay was a failed attemp and that you have z
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 11:40 AM, hasufell wrote:
> On 10/20/2013 05:26 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> On 10/20/2013 04:22 PM, hasufell wrote:
>>> On 10/20/2013 04:40 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 10/20/2013 03:31 PM, hasufell wrote:
> On 10/20/2013 04:13 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/20/2013 05:26 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 10/20/2013 04:22 PM, hasufell wrote:
>> On 10/20/2013 04:40 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>>> On 10/20/2013 03:31 PM, hasufell wrote:
On 10/20/2013 04:13 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 10/20/20
On 10/20/2013 04:22 PM, hasufell wrote:
> On 10/20/2013 04:40 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> On 10/20/2013 03:31 PM, hasufell wrote:
>>> On 10/20/2013 04:13 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 10/20/2013 01:26 PM, Мисбах-Соловьёв Вадим wrote:
>> * not related to the games team * no review whatsoe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/20/2013 04:40 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 10/20/2013 03:31 PM, hasufell wrote:
>> On 10/20/2013 04:13 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>>> On 10/20/2013 01:26 PM, Мисбах-Соловьёв Вадим wrote:
> * not related to the games team * no review whatso
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/20/2013 05:00 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 8:09 AM, hasufell
> wrote:
>> what does the games team think of an official games repository?
>> ... Yes, overlays suck. But bugzilla as a review platform sucks
>> more and IRC is
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 8:09 AM, hasufell wrote:
> what does the games team think of an official games repository?
> ...
> Yes, overlays suck. But bugzilla as a review platform sucks more and
> IRC is also not the first place people look for.
I think having an overlay which is reviewed for qualit
On 10/20/2013 03:31 PM, hasufell wrote:
> On 10/20/2013 04:13 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> On 10/20/2013 01:26 PM, Мисбах-Соловьёв Вадим wrote:
* not related to the games team * no review whatsoever from any
dev on ebuilds that get pushed there
>>>
>>> It is easy-fixable. It is enough to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/20/2013 04:13 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 10/20/2013 01:26 PM, Мисбах-Соловьёв Вадим wrote:
>>> * not related to the games team * no review whatsoever from any
>>> dev on ebuilds that get pushed there
>>
>> It is easy-fixable. It is enough t
On 21 October 2013 01:09, hasufell wrote:
> what does the games team think of an official games repository?
>
> These are some arguments for such a repo:
> * sunrise does not allow ebuilds when any version is already in the
> tree (so no live or beta ebuilds for existing in-tree-games), so that
>
On 10/20/2013 01:26 PM, Мисбах-Соловьёв Вадим wrote:
>> * not related to the games team
>> * no review whatsoever from any dev on ebuilds that get pushed there
>
> It is easy-fixable. It is enough to gentoo-games team to back to work on it
> together with community.
>
>> * low quality
> low qual
> * not related to the games team
> * no review whatsoever from any dev on ebuilds that get pushed there
It is easy-fixable. It is enough to gentoo-games team to back to work on it
together with community.
> * low quality
low quality of what? ebuilds? I bet, it is many lower-quality ebuilds in t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/20/2013 02:19 PM, Мисбах-Соловьёв Вадим wrote:
> Why not use gamerlay then? :D
>
* not related to the games team
* no review whatsoever from any dev on ebuilds that get pushed there
* low quality
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.
Why not use gamerlay then? :D
20.10.2013, 19:17, "hasufell" :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 10/20/2013 02:15 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>
>> Dnia 2013-10-20, o godz. 14:09:29 hasufell
>> napisał(a):
>>> what does the games team think of an official games repository?
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/20/2013 02:15 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 2013-10-20, o godz. 14:09:29 hasufell
> napisał(a):
>
>> what does the games team think of an official games repository?
>
> $ layman -i games
>
> * games * ~ * Source : svn://overlays.gentoo.
Dnia 2013-10-20, o godz. 14:09:29
hasufell napisał(a):
> what does the games team think of an official games repository?
$ layman -i games
* games
* ~
* Source : svn://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/games
* Contact : ga...@gentoo.org
* Type: Subversion; Priority: 50
* Quality : experim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
what does the games team think of an official games repository?
These are some arguments for such a repo:
* sunrise does not allow ebuilds when any version is already in the
tree (so no live or beta ebuilds for existing in-tree-games), so that
is not
34 matches
Mail list logo