[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

Hello, The following packages are up for grabs: sci-geosciences/gmapcatcher dev-util/webstorm Best regards, Amy Liffey signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: dev-vcs/cvs* (post CVS project disband)

Hi, Due to the CVS project being disbanded [1], the following packages are up for grabs: dev-vcs/cvs dev-vcs/cvs2cl dev-vcs/cvsd dev-vcs/cvsgraph dev-vcs/cvsq dev-vcs/cvsutils A few notes to warn you though: - CVS is effectively dead upstream, and carries a lot of patches, - dev-vcs/cvs has

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: app-forensics/* and other forensics@g.o packages

On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 5:41 PM, R0b0t1 wrote: > The last update visible on pentoo.ch is from two years ago. Is the > project still active? Yes. Check their github [0] - they may have stopped caring as much about their separate bootable project, but the overlay is alive and

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: app-forensics/* and other forensics@g.o packages

On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 12:49 PM, RB wrote: > On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Michał Górny wrote: >> app-admin/integrit >> app-forensics/afflib [o] >> app-forensics/air >> app-forensics/autopsy >> app-forensics/chkrootkit [o] >> app-forensics/cmospwd >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: app-forensics/* and other forensics@g.o packages

On August 13, 2017 10:48:05 AM EDT, Aaron Bauman wrote: > > >On August 11, 2017 1:40:28 PM EDT, "Michał Górny" >wrote: >>Hi, >> >>Due to the Forensics project [1] being disbanded, the following >>packages >>are now up for grabs. Please note that some of the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: app-forensics/* and other forensics@g.o packages

On August 11, 2017 1:40:28 PM EDT, "Michał Górny" wrote: >Hi, > >Due to the Forensics project [1] being disbanded, the following >packages >are now up for grabs. Please note that some of the packages will >probably be taken by former project members. > >app-admin/integrit

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: app-forensics/* and other forensics@g.o packages

I have used chkrootkit and rkhunter in the past. Will copy them to my overlay (https://github.com/petteyg/gentoo-overlay) if they don't get a maintainer. On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 12:49 PM, RB wrote: > On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Michał Górny wrote: >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: app-forensics/* and other forensics@g.o packages

On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > app-admin/integrit > app-forensics/afflib [o] > app-forensics/air > app-forensics/autopsy > app-forensics/chkrootkit [o] > app-forensics/cmospwd > app-forensics/examiner > app-forensics/galleta > app-forensics/libewf [o] >

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: app-forensics/* and other forensics@g.o packages

Hi, Due to the Forensics project [1] being disbanded, the following packages are now up for grabs. Please note that some of the packages will probably be taken by former project members. app-admin/integrit app-forensics/afflib [o] app-forensics/air app-forensics/autopsy app-forensics/chkrootkit

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: dev-vcs/*bzr*

Hi, everyone. Due to the Bazaar project being disbanded [1], the following packages are up for grabs: [n] dev-vcs/bzr-explorer [o] dev-vcs/bzr-git [n] dev-vcs/bzr-gtk [o] dev-vcs/bzr-rewrite [n] dev-vcs/bzr-xmloutput [n] dev-vcs/bzr [o] dev-vcs/bzrtools [o] dev-vcs/qbzr [n] -- newest/current,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On 2017-08-08 13:05, Amy Liffey wrote: > Hello, > The following packages are up for grabs: > > x11-wm/afterstep > mail-client/nmh > dev-util/wsta > dev-util/bats > app-admin/yadm > > Best regards, > Amy Liffey > I'll take dev-util/bats, my proxy is my mentor

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

Hello, The following packages are up for grabs: x11-wm/afterstep mail-client/nmh dev-util/wsta dev-util/bats app-admin/yadm Best regards, Amy Liffey signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On 2017-08-01 16:36, Amy Liffey wrote: > Hello, > The following packages are up for grabs: > > net-p2p/litecoin-qt > net-p2p/litecoind > sys-process/nmon > > Best regards, > Amy Liffey I'll take sys-process/nmon as I'm regularly using it. My proxy is polynomial-c. Cheers -- /"\ ASCII Ribbon

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

Hello, The following packages are up for grabs: net-p2p/litecoin-qt net-p2p/litecoind sys-process/nmon Best regards, Amy Liffey signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

Hello, The following packages are up for grabs: app-admin/localepurge net-misc/ytalk Best regards, Amy Liffey signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: MythTV

Hello, The following packages are up for grabs: dev-python/imdbpy media-plugins/mythplugins media-tv/mythtv media-tv/mythtv-status Best regards, Andreas

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

Hello, The following packages are up for grabs: net-analyzer/nagios-check_fail2ban net-analyzer//nagios-check_pidfile Best regards, Amy Liffey signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

Due to disbanding of Desktop-effects project[1], these packages are up for grabs: dev-python/compizconfig-python x11-apps/fusion-icon x11-libs/compiz-bcop x11-libs/compizconfig-backend-gconf x11-libs/compizconfig-backend-kconfig4 x11-libs/libcompizconfig x11-misc/3dfb x11-misc/3dfm x11-misc/ccsm

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

The following packages are up for grabs: app-text/yagf dev-util/bsdiff dev-util/skipfish games-fps/serious-sam-tfe games-fps/serious-sam-tse sys-process/procexp -- Best regards, Sergey Popov Gentoo developer Gentoo Quality Assurance project lead signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

The following packages are up for grabs: app-misc/cwiid x11-apps/spotlighter x11-apps/python-whiteboard x11-apps/whyteboard -- gokturk signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On 21/06/2017 00:13, Daniel Campbell wrote: > On 06/20/2017 05:53 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: >> This packages are now up for grabs: >> dev-ml/fort >> media-libs/embree >> x11-wm/i3 >> >> > I use i3-gaps these days, but if no-one else is willing, I'll take up i3 > since it's close enough to i3-gaps to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On 06/20/2017 05:53 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > This packages are now up for grabs: > dev-ml/fort > media-libs/embree > x11-wm/i3 > > I use i3-gaps these days, but if no-one else is willing, I'll take up i3 since it's close enough to i3-gaps to be considered mostly the same. Dual maintainership is

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

> On Tue, 20 Jun 2017, Pacho Ramos wrote: > This packages are now up for grabs: > eclass/l10n.eclass I can take this one. Ulrich pgpyjv3fExdLQ.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Tue, 20 Jun 2017 14:53:00 +0200 Pacho Ramos wrote: > This packages are now up for grabs: > dev-ml/fort added ml@g.o there as a matter of fact: dev-ml/* should have ml@g.o at least as fallback to have easier coordination & transitions for major ocaml releases

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

This packages are now up for grabs: dev-ml/fort media-libs/embree x11-wm/i3

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

This packages are now up for grabs: dev-lua/messagepack dev-python/doit net-news/rssguard eclass/l10n.eclass

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Fri, 28 Apr 2017 23:02:40 +0200 Manuel Rüger wrote: > www-servers/spawn-fcgi I’ll file for proxied maintainership of this one, since it looks like nobody else has taken it yet. -- Christopher Head pgpGqPRsTEBZz.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] packages up for grabs (from phajdan.jr, May 2017)

This is probably overdue. I'm not really maintaining the following packages, mostly because I no longer use them. I have dropped myself from metadata.xml . Feel free to grab. If you have questions about them, just email me. app-admin/logcheck (2 bugs) app-admin/syslog-summary (1 bug)

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 11:02:40PM +0200, Manuel Rüger wrote: > dev-tex/biblatex > dev-tex/biblatex-apa > dev-tex/biber I would volunteer to proxy-maintain these. I already proxy-maintain a few packages and would go through the same contact (xmw). signature.asc Description: Digital signature

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

Hi, I have no use for those packages anymore. Feel free to add yourself as a (proxied) maintainer to: dev-tex/biblatex dev-tex/biblatex-apa dev-tex/biber dev-vcs/git-num www-apps/jekyll www-apps/jekyll-coffeescript www-apps/jekyll-gist www-apps/jekyll-paginate www-apps/jekyll-sass-converter

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Thu, 27 Apr 2017 12:58:23 +0200 Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > I also want to drop the following: > > - dev-lang/erlang It'd be great if whoever takes over maintainership of erlang could also take care of dev-util/rebar. Dirkjan is currently proxying it for me, but I don't use it

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On 2017-04-27 12:58, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > The proxy maintainer for syncthing just resigned, anyone want to pick > it up? I'll take it. -- MS signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

The proxy maintainer for syncthing just resigned, anyone want to pick it up? - net-p2p/syncthing I also want to drop the following: - dev-lang/erlang - dev-vcs/hgsubversion (All should be in a fairly good state right now.) Cheers, Dirkjan

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 The following packages are up for grabs: app-admin/webmin gnome-extra/cameramonitor media-video/photofilmstrip - -- gokturk -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJY68LIAAoJEIT4AuXAiM4zpjMH/RVLyi0QMVX4mSj9X1+i/L/a

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

Hello all, some new orphaned packages: x11-wm/fvwm app-text/pdfsandwich dev-cpp/gtest net-misc/wicd dev-lua/luvit Cheers, Amy Liffey signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On 03/26/2017 02:50 PM, aide...@gentoo.org wrote: > Hi, > > The following packages are up for grabs: > > app-admin/hddtemp > app-backup/burp > app-crypt/md5deep > dev-python/appdirs > dev-python/husl > dev-python/pyro > dev-python/selectors34 > sys-apps/biosdevname > > These

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On 3/26/17 3:50 PM, aide...@gentoo.org wrote: > app-crypt/md5deep I'll take this. I use it in hashing stage3's and tar'ed systems I push out. -- Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] E-Mail: bluen...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

Hi, The following packages are up for grabs: app-admin/hddtemp app-backup/burp app-crypt/md5deep dev-python/appdirs dev-python/husl dev-python/pyro dev-python/selectors34 sys-apps/biosdevname These packages are quite easy to maintain, so if someone cares about any of these,

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

Hi, The following packages are up for grabs: app-emulation/fuse app-emulation/fuse-utils app-emulation/libspectrum -- gokturk signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

Hi, The following packages are up for grabs: net-im/psi net-im/psimedia net-p2p/eiskaltdcpp net-p2p/torrentinfo www-misc/fcgiwrap x11-apps/radeontop -- gokturk signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] packages up for grabs

My mentee has decided to not pursue Gentoo any more and as a result there is one package up for grabs. games-arcade/savagewheels -- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire) signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

Due to a retiring proxied maintainer, these packages are now up for grabs: dev-python/python-gammu net-irc/inspircd

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs post disbanding Ada: dev-lang/gnat-gcc and metastuff

On February 22, 2017 2:07:47 AM PST, "Michał Górny" wrote: >Hi, > >The Ada project has been disbanded as having no members. Although there >were a few people interested in helping out with Ada, nobody made it >past the initial reply. Shortly after sending my reply noting that

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs post disbanding Ada: dev-lang/gnat-gcc and metastuff

On Wed, 22 Feb 2017 11:07:47 +0100 Michał Górny wrote: > Hi, > > The Ada project has been disbanded as having no members. Although > there were a few people interested in helping out with Ada, nobody > made it past the initial reply. If anyone is still interested, the >

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs post disbanding Ada: dev-lang/gnat-gcc and metastuff

Hi, The Ada project has been disbanded as having no members. Although there were a few people interested in helping out with Ada, nobody made it past the initial reply. If anyone is still interested, the packages are up for grabs. This involves the following packages: app-eselect/eselect-gnat

Re: Why lastrite when it works? (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement)

On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 04:45:39AM -0800, Daniel Campbell wrote: > On 01/06/2017 12:46 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > > On Friday, January 6, 2017 9:14:54 AM EST Alec Warner wrote: > >> > >> The nice thing about ::graveyard or similar is that its a clear demarcation > >> between maintained

Re: Why lastrite when it works? (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement)

On 01/06/2017 12:46 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > On Friday, January 6, 2017 9:14:54 AM EST Alec Warner wrote: >> >> The nice thing about ::graveyard or similar is that its a clear demarcation >> between maintained (in tree) and unmaintained (graveyard.) It also means >> that people doing

Re: Why lastrite when it works? (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement)

On 06/01/17 17:14, Alec Warner wrote: > > Treecleaning to me is really two things: > > 1) developer maintenance time. > a) It costs nothing to add packages to the tree, and the tree grows > in size every year. > b) Removals occur due to obsolescence (X replaces Y, etc) but these > are strictly

Re: Why lastrite when it works? (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement)

On 06/01/17 15:01, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 11:27 PM, Kent Fredric wrote: >> If packages had a field called "BUGS=" it could contain an array of >> bugs a package is known to contain, but can be conditionally avoided if >> you're careful. >> >> Packages with

Re: Why lastrite when it works? (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement)

On 06/01/17 04:27, Kent Fredric wrote: > On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 10:23:02 -0500 > Rich Freeman wrote: > >> I tend to be firmly in the camp that a package shouldn't be removed >> unless there is evidence of a serious bug (and that includes things >> blocking other Gentoo packages). >

Re: Why lastrite when it works? (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement)

On Friday, January 6, 2017 9:13:20 AM EST Michael Mol wrote: > > The bigger resource drain, I suspect, will come from maintaining new ebuilds > of old packages; as eclass development and maintenance seeks to eliminate > old and buggy code, old ebuilds will need to be dragged along for the ride.

Re: Why lastrite when it works? (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement)

On Friday, January 6, 2017 9:14:54 AM EST Alec Warner wrote: > > The nice thing about ::graveyard or similar is that its a clear demarcation > between maintained (in tree) and unmaintained (graveyard.) It also means > that people doing actual maintenance work can basically ignore the > graveyard

Re: Why lastrite when it works? (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement)

On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Alec Warner wrote: > > So my understanding of the status quo is that maintainers get to make the > call with regard to what is reasonable to keep or drop. I'm loathe to add > additional policy here; mostly because the expectation is that the >

Re: Why lastrite when it works? (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement)

On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 8:27 PM, Kent Fredric wrote: > On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 10:23:02 -0500 > Rich Freeman wrote: > > > I tend to be firmly in the camp that a package shouldn't be removed > > unless there is evidence of a serious bug (and that includes things >

Re: Why lastrite when it works? (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement)

On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 11:27 PM, Kent Fredric wrote: > > If packages had a field called "BUGS=" it could contain an array of > bugs a package is known to contain, but can be conditionally avoided if > you're careful. > > Packages with non-empty BUGS= fields would be treated as

Re: Why lastrite when it works? (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement)

On Friday, January 6, 2017 5:27:24 PM EST Kent Fredric wrote: > On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 10:23:02 -0500 > > Rich Freeman wrote: > > I tend to be firmly in the camp that a package shouldn't be removed > > unless there is evidence of a serious bug (and that includes things > > blocking

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement

Ühel kenal päeval, N, 05.01.2017 kell 22:00, kirjutas Daniel Campbell: > I'm in favor of keeping software around until it breaks. When there's > a > non-existent upstream and nobody's willing to take up the helm > themselves, it's a clear indication that it's in danger of being > treecleaned. In

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement

On 01/03/2017 06:31 AM, M. J. Everitt wrote: > On 03/01/17 11:05, Michał Górny wrote: >> On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 16:00:52 +0700 (+07) >> gro...@gentoo.org wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 2 Jan 2017, Brian Evans wrote: IMO, this one should be given last-rites as upstream is dead and it heavily depends

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement

On Wed, 04 Jan 2017 05:11:18 +0200 Mart Raudsepp wrote: > I believe with this mgorny has given ample proof that he is just a > ciaranm sock puppet account. One neat trick is to have *two* sock puppet accounts, and then have one accuse the other of being a sock puppet, which

Re: Why lastrite when it works? (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement)

On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 10:23:02 -0500 Rich Freeman wrote: > I tend to be firmly in the camp that a package shouldn't be removed > unless there is evidence of a serious bug (and that includes things > blocking other Gentoo packages). I would probably go further and extend that

Re: Why lastrite when it works? (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement)

On 03/01/2017 15:24, Damien LEVAC wrote: > > > On 01/03/2017 09:14 AM, Michael Mol wrote: >> On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 12:05:10 PM EST Michał Górny wrote: >>> On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 16:00:52 +0700 (+07) >>> >>> gro...@gentoo.org wrote: On Mon, 2 Jan 2017, Brian Evans wrote: > IMO, this

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement

Ühel kenal päeval, T, 03.01.2017 kell 09:34, kirjutas Damien LEVAC: > > On 01/03/2017 09:31 AM, M. J. Everitt wrote: > > > > On 03/01/17 11:05, Michał Górny wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 16:00:52 +0700 (+07) > > > gro...@gentoo.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 2 Jan 2017,

Re: Why lastrite when it works? (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement)

On 01/03/2017 09:10 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > On 01/03/2017 03:57 PM, Michael Mol wrote: >> For security's sake, even mature software needs, at minimum, routine >> auditing. >> Unless someone's doing that work, the package should be considered for >> removal. (Call that reason # π, in

Re: Why lastrite when it works? (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement)

On 01/03/2017 09:11 AM, Damien LEVAC wrote: > But routine auditing, while being wishful thinking in the open-source > world (even when the projects are alive), are not meant to find those > kind of bugs anyway (and wouldn't be effective at doing so either). > I think it's wishful thinking in

Re: Why lastrite when it works? (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement)

On 01/03/2017 10:41 AM, Alice Ferrazzi wrote: On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 12:23 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Michael Mol wrote: For security's sake, even mature software needs, at minimum, routine auditing. Unless someone's doing

Re: Why lastrite when it works? (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement)

On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 11:09 AM, Michael Mol wrote: > > Ideas like this is one reason I'm looking for a corpus of pros and cons for > treecleaning. I don't see it as black and white. But having ideas like these > brought up is at least useful. > Sure, and almost any rule has

Re: Why lastrite when it works? (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement)

On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 10:23:02 AM EST Rich Freeman wrote: > On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Michael Mol wrote: > > For security's sake, even mature software needs, at minimum, routine > > auditing. Unless someone's doing that work, the package should be > > considered for

Re: Why lastrite when it works? (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement)

On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 12:23 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Michael Mol wrote: >> >> For security's sake, even mature software needs, at minimum, routine >> auditing. >> Unless someone's doing that work, the package should be

Re: Why lastrite when it works? (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement)

On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Michael Mol wrote: > > For security's sake, even mature software needs, at minimum, routine auditing. > Unless someone's doing that work, the package should be considered for > removal. (Call that reason #π, in honor of TeX.) > Are you

Re: Why lastrite when it works? (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement)

On 03/01/17 14:57, Michael Mol wrote: > On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 9:24:19 AM EST Damien LEVAC wrote: >> On 01/03/2017 09:14 AM, Michael Mol wrote: >>> On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 12:05:10 PM EST Michał Górny wrote: On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 16:00:52 +0700 (+07) gro...@gentoo.org wrote:

Re: Why lastrite when it works? (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement)

On 01/03/2017 09:57 AM, Michael Mol wrote: On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 9:24:19 AM EST Damien LEVAC wrote: On 01/03/2017 09:14 AM, Michael Mol wrote: On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 12:05:10 PM EST Michał Górny wrote: On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 16:00:52 +0700 (+07) gro...@gentoo.org wrote: On Mon, 2

Re: Why lastrite when it works? (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement)

On 01/03/2017 03:57 PM, Michael Mol wrote: > For security's sake, even mature software needs, at minimum, routine > auditing. > Unless someone's doing that work, the package should be considered for > removal. (Call that reason # π, in honor of TeX.) A distinction here likely needs to be made

Re: Why lastrite when it works? (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement)

On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 9:24:19 AM EST Damien LEVAC wrote: > On 01/03/2017 09:14 AM, Michael Mol wrote: > > On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 12:05:10 PM EST Michał Górny wrote: > >> On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 16:00:52 +0700 (+07) > >> > >> gro...@gentoo.org wrote: > >>> On Mon, 2 Jan 2017, Brian Evans

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement

On 01/03/2017 09:31 AM, M. J. Everitt wrote: On 03/01/17 11:05, Michał Górny wrote: On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 16:00:52 +0700 (+07) gro...@gentoo.org wrote: On Mon, 2 Jan 2017, Brian Evans wrote: IMO, this one should be given last-rites as upstream is dead and it heavily depends on wireless-tools

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement

On 03/01/17 11:05, Michał Górny wrote: > On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 16:00:52 +0700 (+07) > gro...@gentoo.org wrote: > >> On Mon, 2 Jan 2017, Brian Evans wrote: >>> IMO, this one should be given last-rites as upstream is dead and it >>> heavily depends on wireless-tools and WEXT. >> I use it on 2

Re: Why lastrite when it works? (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement)

On 01/03/2017 09:14 AM, Michael Mol wrote: On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 12:05:10 PM EST Michał Górny wrote: On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 16:00:52 +0700 (+07) gro...@gentoo.org wrote: On Mon, 2 Jan 2017, Brian Evans wrote: IMO, this one should be given last-rites as upstream is dead and it heavily

Why lastrite when it works? (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement)

On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 12:05:10 PM EST Michał Górny wrote: > On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 16:00:52 +0700 (+07) > > gro...@gentoo.org wrote: > > On Mon, 2 Jan 2017, Brian Evans wrote: > > > IMO, this one should be given last-rites as upstream is dead and it > > > heavily depends on wireless-tools and

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement

Hi, On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 16:00:52 +0700 (+07) gro...@gentoo.org wrote: >On Mon, 2 Jan 2017, Brian Evans wrote: >> IMO, this one should be given last-rites as upstream is dead and it >> heavily depends on wireless-tools and WEXT. this is plain wrong. Upstream is not dead, just not very active

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement

On Tue, 3 Jan 2017 16:00:52 +0700 (+07) gro...@gentoo.org wrote: > On Mon, 2 Jan 2017, Brian Evans wrote: > > IMO, this one should be given last-rites as upstream is dead and it > > heavily depends on wireless-tools and WEXT. > I use it on 2 notebooks. It works fine, and is (from my point of

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement

On Mon, 2 Jan 2017, Brian Evans wrote: IMO, this one should be given last-rites as upstream is dead and it heavily depends on wireless-tools and WEXT. I use it on 2 notebooks. It works fine, and is (from my point of view) the most convenient tool to control ethernet and wifi connections on a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement

On 01/01/2017 12:16 PM, Lars Wendler wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > On Sat, 31 Dec 2016 22:54:28 +0100 Thomas Kahle wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I will retire, so here are my remaining packages. > > Sad day seeing another dev leaving :-( > >> net-misc/wicd > > I can take this one if nobody else is

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement

Hi Thomas, On Sat, 31 Dec 2016 22:54:28 +0100 Thomas Kahle wrote: >Hi, > >I will retire, so here are my remaining packages. Sad day seeing another dev leaving :-( >net-misc/wicd I can take this one if nobody else is interested in it. >Cheers, >Thomas > > I wish you all the best and if you

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement

On Sun, 1 Jan 2017 10:42:51 +0100 Thomas Kahle wrote: > On 01/01/2017 00:00, James Le Cuirot wrote: > > On Sat, 31 Dec 2016 22:54:28 +0100 > > Thomas Kahle wrote: > > > >> I will retire > > > > Sorry to hear that. :( > > > >> app-text/tesseract > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement

On 01/01/2017 00:00, James Le Cuirot wrote: > On Sat, 31 Dec 2016 22:54:28 +0100 > Thomas Kahle wrote: > >> I will retire > > Sorry to hear that. :( > >> app-text/tesseract > > I maintain media-libs/leptonica, which is primarily in the tree because > of Tesseract. I don't

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement

On Sat, 31 Dec 2016 22:54:28 +0100 Thomas Kahle wrote: > I will retire Sorry to hear that. :( > app-text/tesseract I maintain media-libs/leptonica, which is primarily in the tree because of Tesseract. I don't use Tesseract myself though and it's not a trivial package to

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement

Hi, I will retire, so here are my remaining packages. Feel free to e-mail me any questions re this. sci-math is in CC because there are quite a few math packages. app-emacs/undo-tree app-misc/anki app-portage/tatt app-text/tesseract app-text/pdfsandwich dev-cpp/gtest dev-python/python-wpactrl

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, The following packages are up for grabs: app-backup/vzdump app-misc/vzstats dev-libs/sblim-sfcc games-misc/fortune-mod-gentoo-ru mail-filter/libdkim sys-cluster/ploop sys-cluster/vzctl sys-kernel/openvz-sources - -- gokturk

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

These packages are now up for grabs: dev-python/httmock dev-python/jenkins-autojobs dev-python/jenkins-webapi dev-python/jenkinsapi

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On 25/11/2016 23:34, Mathy Vanvoorden wrote: > AFAIK they are not intended to be installed as compiled code at all. > You are supposed to bundle them, or otherwise compile them from sources > along with your project. > > > You are correct, apparently they changed their stance on this

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

> > AFAIK they are not intended to be installed as compiled code at all. > You are supposed to bundle them, or otherwise compile them from sources > along with your project. > > You are correct, apparently they changed their stance on this some time ago as you can read here:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Fri, 25 Nov 2016 12:25:37 -0500 Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Thomas Kahle wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'd like to pass on maintainership of > > > > dev-cpp/gtest > > dev-cpp/gmock > > > > I don't use them and I don't even remember

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Thomas Kahle wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to pass on maintainership of > > dev-cpp/gtest > dev-cpp/gmock > > I don't use them and I don't even remember how I came to maintain > them. These two are among the packages that have googlecode in > their

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

Hi, I use them so I don't mind (proxy) maintaining them. gr, Mathy -- Met vriendelijke groeten, Best regards, Mathy Vanvoorden 2016-11-25 16:06 GMT+01:00 Thomas Kahle : > Hi, > > I'd like to pass on maintainership of > > dev-cpp/gtest > dev-cpp/gmock > > I don't use them

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

Hi, I'd like to pass on maintainership of dev-cpp/gtest dev-cpp/gmock I don't use them and I don't even remember how I came to maintain them. These two are among the packages that have googlecode in their SRC_URI, so this is a bit urgent. Upstream has moved to github and merged the two

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs from sci-geosciences category

Hi, Continuing my efforts not to be listed as a maintainer for packages I don't really care about: There are a bunch of packages in the sci-geosciences category that I maintained a long time ago when I was active in the openstreetmap community. All of them are listed with the sci-geosciences

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

interested in euscan I'm using it in one of my server. but I'm away untill 14 of this month. 2016/08/07 18:27 "Patrick Lauer" : > On 08/07/2016 10:12 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > >> This packages are

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Fri, 2016-08-19 at 15:20 +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote: > This packages are now up for grabs: >  > x11-misc/revelation I'm still using this at the moment so I'll take this. Hans signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On 08/19/2016 06:07 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: This packages are now up for grabs: app-crypt/efitools app-crypt/pesign app-doc/linux-kernel-in-a-nutshell dev-util/cgvg dev-util/kup dev-util/xxdi net-misc/bti app-doc/linux-kernel-in-a-nutshell is quite interesting. I went to greg's site, looked

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

This packages are now up for grabs: app-arch/unmakeself app-crypt/md5deep app-editors/leafpad x11-misc/revelation x11-themes/vanilla-dmz-aa-xcursors x11-themes/vanilla-dmz-xcursors

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

This packages are now up for grabs: app-crypt/efitools app-crypt/pesign app-doc/linux-kernel-in-a-nutshell dev-util/cgvg dev-util/kup dev-util/xxdi net-misc/bti

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >