Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Bugzilla arch list reordering

2018-01-23 Thread Michał Górny
W dniu wto, 23.01.2018 o godzinie 21∶44 +0100, użytkownik Thomas Deutschmann napisał: > Hi, > > On 2018-01-23 12:46, Michał Górny wrote: > > > I've created a small HTML file with example of how this would look: > > > > > > https://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/tmp/cc.html > > > > > > > I've updated

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Bugzilla arch list reordering

2018-01-23 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
Hi, On 2018-01-23 12:46, Michał Górny wrote: >> I've created a small HTML file with example of how this would look: >> >> https://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/tmp/cc.html >> > > I've updated the example to include the variant suggested by Dirkjan. > All arches are order according to the popularity

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Bugzilla arch list reordering

2018-01-23 Thread Michał Górny
W dniu wto, 23.01.2018 o godzinie 13∶23 +0100, użytkownik Fabian Groffen napisał: > On 23-01-2018 12:49:00 +0100, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 12:46 PM, Michał Górny <[1]mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > > > Since neither of the proposals has received any specific reply, I'm

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Bugzilla arch list reordering

2018-01-23 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Tue, 23 Jan 2018, Michał Górny wrote: > I've updated the example to include the variant suggested by > Dirkjan. All arches are order according to the popularity (based on > the results from his mail), except Prefix which I left at the bottom > as a special case. Whether you will have

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Bugzilla arch list reordering

2018-01-23 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 23-01-2018 12:49:00 +0100, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 12:46 PM, Michał Górny <[1]mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > Since neither of the proposals has received any specific reply, I'm not > > sure how to proceed from here. I suppose we can possibly have two lists > > in

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Bugzilla arch list reordering

2018-01-23 Thread Mart Raudsepp
On Tue, 2018-01-23 at 12:49 +0100, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 12:46 PM, Michał Górny > wrote: > > Since neither of the proposals has received any specific reply, I'm > > not > > sure how to proceed from here. I suppose we can possibly have two > > lists >

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Bugzilla arch list reordering

2018-01-23 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 12:46 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > Since neither of the proposals has received any specific reply, I'm not > sure how to proceed from here. I suppose we can possibly have two lists > in different order so that people could use whichever they prefer. > Not

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Bugzilla arch list reordering

2018-01-23 Thread Michał Górny
W dniu pon, 15.01.2018 o godzinie 23∶01 +0100, użytkownik Michał Górny napisał: > I've created a small HTML file with example of how this would look: > > https://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/tmp/cc.html > I've updated the example to include the variant suggested by Dirkjan. All arches are order

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Bugzilla arch list reordering

2018-01-16 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 11:19 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > I disagree. I think most of the developers are used to the lexical sort, > and it keeps the order predictable. While I suppose keeping amd64 > and x86 alongside for the sake of being commonly used would make sense, > I

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Bugzilla arch list reordering

2018-01-16 Thread Michał Górny
W dniu wto, 16.01.2018 o godzinie 10∶15 +0100, użytkownik Dirkjan Ochtman napisał: > On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 11:01 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > > Besides regrouping, I've also reordered the keywords to use the same > > sorting order as eshowkw (i.e. ppc before ppc64), moved

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Bugzilla arch list reordering

2018-01-16 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 11:01 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > Besides regrouping, I've also reordered the keywords to use the same > sorting order as eshowkw (i.e. ppc before ppc64), moved 'BSD' into teams (in contrast to 'AMD64 FBSD' and 'X86 FBSD'), and added 'Prefix' team. > I