On Tuesday 24 January 2006 14:17, Alec Warner wrote:
I figured it was time for a bit of cleaning... I ended up writing a
really crappy script for stable to do a check of whether package.mask
entries were really referencing anything or not. Luckily Brian was able
to write a much better one for
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 09:17:24 -0500
Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I figured it was time for a bit of cleaning... I ended up writing a
really crappy script for stable to do a check of whether package.mask
entries were really referencing
Alec Warner wrote:
Please have a look and see if any of the packages are yours.
It would probably be easier if you added the maintainer of each package
to the list (it shouldn't be that difficult, but I'm not volunteering :-P).
/Martin
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 16:23, Marcus D. Hanwell wrote:
All of the KDE stuff is the upcoming 3.5.1 release which we are working on
in p.mask until the official release. There *are* ebuilds for all this
stuff in the tree right now. So that has chopped the number of entries by a
fair margin,
Marius Mauch wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 09:17:24 -0500
Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I figured it was time for a bit of cleaning... I ended up writing a
really crappy script for stable to do a check of whether package.mask
entries were
Marcus D. Hanwell wrote:
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 14:17, Alec Warner wrote:
I figured it was time for a bit of cleaning... I ended up writing a
really crappy script for stable to do a check of whether package.mask
entries were really referencing anything or not. Luckily Brian was able
to
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 15:40, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 16:23, Marcus D. Hanwell wrote:
All of the KDE stuff is the upcoming 3.5.1 release which we are working
on in p.mask until the official release. There *are* ebuilds for all this
stuff in the tree
On 1/24/06, Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please have a look and see if any of the packages are yours. Entries in
package.mask should have a corresponding ebuild in the tree somewhere.
I'd like to see the number of entries chopped by a fair margin.
I masked prelude stuff so that it
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 10:45:40 -0500
Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was attempting to be helpful and filter out valid packages from the
list. I could have been an ass and been like Yo I think
package.mask is bloated go clean it and not given a list at all, but
that is not very useful.
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 17:40, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 16:23, Marcus D. Hanwell wrote:
All of the KDE stuff is the upcoming 3.5.1 release which we are working
on in p.mask until the official release. There *are* ebuilds for all this
stuff in the tree
10 matches
Mail list logo
