Alin Nastac wrote:
Marius Mauch wrote:
CVS doesn't support symlinks.
But subversion does ;)
Doesn't help here.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Mon, 16 May 2005 19:36:41 +0200
Simon Stelling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nice to finally have you on board!
Well, in his case I'm inclined to say it only was a matter of time. :)
BTW: are you guys coming to "What the Hack" this summer? Would be nice
to do something for the Austria-Swiss fr
On Mon, 2005-05-16 at 22:46 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> could people update and try out busybox-1.00-r4 ? i finally stopped being
> lazy and ported all the utils from upstream busybox into 1.00-r4 ...
>
> once you emerge it, you'll be left with /bin/bb which is now your fun rescue
> shell ..
Greetings,
I was just checking this morning the dev-lang/ category, and
i didn't see the dylan programming language around. was it removed?
Also, would anybody like to take care of dev-lang/smalltalkx ?
It is very out-of-date, and the installation of the latest versions aren't
easy to follow thr
On Tuesday 17 May 2005 10:13, Brian Harring wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 09:58:43AM +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> > Stefan Schweizer wrote:
> > > Many bugs in bugzilla have ebuilds contributed, the work is done,
> > > there is just no developer to add them to the tree and review them.
> > > Bu
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 05:40:25PM +, Alexander Simonov wrote:
> It's all grate! But how about mysql 5 ?
5.0 will come later on (once Francesco is a dev). If you want it now,
go and find Francesco's overlay.
> And wath about spliting mysq into mysql-server and mysql-client how it
> do like in
Jan,
I point you to http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92449#c34
Lance gave a great explanation of the issue before I could get around to
replying. The time is based on the database behind bugzilla, which is
currently residing in Oregon (PDT). I am unaware of any setting for a
user-defined tim
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Some of the new features are pretty sweet though, so thanks for doing it!
Is it possible to add some feature which will allow end users to change
timezone in which the times are reported? Or at least allow UTC?
-jkt
--
cd /local/pub && more beer > /dev/mouth
signature
On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 17:40 +, Alexander Simonov wrote:
> Francesco Riosa wrote:
> > Lance Albertson wrote:
> > >Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > >>Many thanks to Francesco Riosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for his
> > >> hard work in dealing with MySQL-4.1. He's joining Gentoo soon as a new
> > >> develope
Lance Albertson wrote:
>Robin H. Johnson wrote:
>
>
>
>>Many thanks to Francesco Riosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for his hard
>>work in dealing with MySQL-4.1. He's joining Gentoo soon as a new developer to
>>help maintain MySQL for the 4.1 and 5.0 series, and hopefully also providing a
>>package for
On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 10:33 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > A much better approach would be for there to be a rescue build,
> > completely independent of the stages, since it doesn't need to mirror
> > them in any way.
Francesco Riosa wrote:
> Lance Albertson wrote:
> >Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> >>Many thanks to Francesco Riosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for his
> >> hard work in dealing with MySQL-4.1. He's joining Gentoo soon as a new
> >> developer to help maintain MySQL for the 4.1 and 5.0 series, and
> >> hopefully
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeffrey Forman wrote:
> You are very welcome, it was a pleasure to upgrade such a critical
> piece of Gentoo, even though it required time I could have spent outside
> in the Florida sun.
Heh, that explains why I spend so much time working on Ge
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> A much better approach would be for there to be a rescue build,
> completely independent of the stages, since it doesn't need to mirror
> them in any way. It should be extracted (self-extracted?) to something
> like /rescue a
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 02:16:58PM +0100, Paul Waring wrote:
> On 5/17/05, Robin H. Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > MySQL-4.1.12 is in the tree (hard-masked), and I would like lots of early
> > testing.
> > MySQL-4.0.24-r2 is also in the tree (hard-masked) for testing, and contains
> > some
yeah, i hit send, then jforman hit send. sorry.
On Tuesday 17 May 2005 12:42 pm, Michael Cummings wrote:
> (fearing the jeff wrath)
>
> can we get the dup status added back in though? i know, i know, we're being
> nitpicky, and not too many folks have stood up and applauded this effort
> like the
Michael,
You are very welcome, it was a pleasure to upgrade such a critical
piece of Gentoo, even though it required time I could have spent outside
in the Florida sun. As for your question about adding in the duplicate
status. 'Duplicate' isn't a status, its a resolution state. I point yo
On Mon, 2005-05-16 at 20:48 -0400, Olivier CrÃte wrote:
> I would tend to believe that the content of a stage1 or stage2 would be
> enough and just for the majors architectures (those that have a
> stage1).. Anyways people will rebuild said packages once that's done,
> right? That's not much for th
(fearing the jeff wrath)
can we get the dup status added back in though? i know, i know, we're being
nitpicky, and not too many folks have stood up and applauded this effort like
they should have (ahem). Just...unsettling to see bugs marked as resolved -
make it sound like i did something rathe
I retract my earlier statement. In the upgrade, I forgot to fully copy
over all the resolution states. (Don't you just love that comfortable
feeling that comes with editing a live system?) Now when a bug is marked
as a duplicate it shows up as
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: DUPLICATE of bug (some
Bingo, I found the correlation between those bugs and the previous ones
mentioned by Daniel. They have all been marked as duplicates of other
bugs. Therefore bugzilla does not put a "resolution" in there, only
marking them as status: resolved.
-Jeffrey
On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 11:19 -0400, Aaron Wal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeffrey Forman wrote:
> That seems odd, then again, those are VERY old bugs. Way before my time
> of looking at bugzilla to upgrade.
Don't think it has anything to do with age. Just marked this one a dup this
morning.
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug
That seems odd, then again, those are VERY old bugs. Way before my time
of looking at bugzilla to upgrade.
-Jeffrey
On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 15:50 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Many others seem to have the same problem. Examples: 51546, 55672, 57225,
> 65220, 71578, 72700, 16516.
>
> Daniel
--
--
Jeffrey Forman wrote:
> I've looked at the actual DB behind bugzilla, and that seems to be the
> only bug having that such situation, with a resolved-like status, but no
> resolution, all the other bugs look fine. *shrug*
Many others seem to have the same problem. Examples: 51546, 55672, 57225,
65
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeffrey Forman wrote:
> I've looked at the actual DB behind bugzilla, and that seems to be the
> only bug having that such situation, with a resolved-like status, but no
> resolution, all the other bugs look fine. *shrug*
>
> -Jeffrey
bug 89521 [1]
I've looked at the actual DB behind bugzilla, and that seems to be the
only bug having that such situation, with a resolved-like status, but no
resolution, all the other bugs look fine. *shrug*
-Jeffrey
On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 17:05 +0300, Alin Dobre wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Ha
Easy guys, please. I'm only one person doing all this work. I can only
do one thing at a time. (No, that is not an invitation for people to
suggest themselves to help do it. Right now it's easy for my brain to
just do fixes in a linear fashion rather than forking() to other people)
-Jeffrey
On Tu
On 5/17/05, Francesco Riosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Don't know if robbat2 need other testings but here it has been tested
> only on x86, at the moment there are no other archs avaiable for testing.
If ebuilds exist for PPC (there appears to be one for 4.1.8-r1) then
I'll be able to test it on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeffrey Forman wrote:
> [snip]
> Anything else I've forgotten, I will happily take full credit for.
> [snip]
one more thing: comment #15 of bug 92622 [1] shows the bug which was a
dup as marked through. perhaps this is intentional (resolved bugs show
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
While I was waiting for a package to compile, I worked on a new bashrc
some. You can get the bashrc file from here:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~chriswhite/bashrc
to which you can stick it in /etc/portage/ if you want to use it.
two main things it includ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jonathan Smith wrote:
> Georgi Georgiev wrote:
>
>>>maillog: 17/05/2005-16:04:20(+0300): Alin Dobre types
>>>
>*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 12745 ***
Here it is, the last row.
>>>
>>>
>>>But in the headers it says:
>>>
Paul Waring wrote:
>On 5/17/05, Robin H. Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>MySQL-4.1.12 is in the tree (hard-masked), and I would like lots of early
>>testing.
>>MySQL-4.0.24-r2 is also in the tree (hard-masked) for testing, and contains
>>some of the improvements in the 4.1 ebuilds, lik
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Georgi Georgiev wrote:
> maillog: 17/05/2005-16:04:20(+0300): Alin Dobre types
>>>
>>>*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 12745 ***
>>
>>Here it is, the last row.
>
>
> But in the headers it says:
>
> Status: RESOLVED
> Resolution:
>
Lance Albertson wrote:
>Robin H. Johnson wrote:
>
>
>
>>Many thanks to Francesco Riosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for his hard
>>work in dealing with MySQL-4.1. He's joining Gentoo soon as a new developer to
>>help maintain MySQL for the 4.1 and 5.0 series, and hopefully also providing a
>>package for
maillog: 17/05/2005-16:04:20(+0300): Alin Dobre types
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Jonathan Smith wrote:
> >
> > I noticed a bug [1] which, when resolved after the upgrade, did not list
> > the cause of resolution (in this case, it was a dup). Is this no longer
> > req
On 5/17/05, Robin H. Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> MySQL-4.1.12 is in the tree (hard-masked), and I would like lots of early
> testing.
> MySQL-4.0.24-r2 is also in the tree (hard-masked) for testing, and contains
> some of the improvements in the 4.1 ebuilds, like the new pkg_config, and t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jonathan Smith wrote:
>
> I noticed a bug [1] which, when resolved after the upgrade, did not list
> the cause of resolution (in this case, it was a dup). Is this no longer
> required? I rather liked that feature, as it enabled people to see, at a
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeffrey Forman wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> The upgrade for bugs.gentoo.org went exactly as I had planned for.
> Completed in under 20 minutes, which included this email. I've upgraded
> our Bugzilla from the old 2.18rc2 to 2.18.1. This fixes more security
>
On Monday 09 May 2005 03:00, Marius Mauch wrote:
>
> Just put it as a subproject under base as it doesn't have the substance
> for a TLP, and I don't think azarah would mind it ;)
It should be under the tools project. This is clearly a tool.
Paul
--
Paul de Vrieze
Gentoo Developer
Mail: [EMAIL
On Friday 13 May 2005 19:04, Ian Brandt wrote:
> Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> > Quite likely you changed db versions along the run. While this
> > theoretically should work. The best course of action is to dump the
> > repository. Make sure you have a consistent use of db, and load the
> > repository. A
On Tue, 17 May 2005 04:30 am, Alin Nastac wrote:
> app-mobilephone category has emerged, maintained by the brand new
> mobile-phone herd. The herd currently has only one member... me. :)
> interested gentoo devs, feel free to join me!
thanks for taking sms :-)
--
Daniel Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> Many thanks to Francesco Riosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for his hard
> work in dealing with MySQL-4.1. He's joining Gentoo soon as a new developer to
> help maintain MySQL for the 4.1 and 5.0 series, and hopefully also providing a
> package for the official MySQL AB binaries.
Marius Mauch wrote:
>
> CVS doesn't support symlinks.
>
But subversion does ;)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Alastair Tse wrote:
> Hi Alin,
>
> I think I might be of help with the mobile-phone herd given that I
> maintain almost all the bluetooth related packages and at least half
> of the app-pda stuff. I remember st_lim or someone maintaining gnokii
> and variants there-of, so you might want to ask
Hi Alin,
I think I might be of help with the mobile-phone herd given that I
maintain almost all the bluetooth related packages and at least half
of the app-pda stuff. I remember st_lim or someone maintaining gnokii
and variants there-of, so you might want to ask if he is still active
and he
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 04:44:58PM -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> Ok, I've just put the latest OpenLDAP 2.2.26 into the tree, and I don't
> see anything that is now holding back the 2.2 series from ~arch. In 2
> weeks, I plan to move it to ~arch, from it's present p.mask status.
OpenLDAP-2.2 is n
Ok, the MySQL-4.1 work is finally nearing completing (it doesn't eat my
data anymore, so now you get to see if it eats your data instead).
MySQL-4.1.12 is in the tree (hard-masked), and I would like lots of early
testing.
MySQL-4.0.24-r2 is also in the tree (hard-masked) for testing, and contains
Georgi Georgiev wrote:
maillog: 16/05/2005-11:46:15(-0700): Donnie Berkholz types
Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
The current ebuild is orinoco-0.15_rc2-r2.ebuild, and the logical name
for a CVS snapshot would, as I see it, be
orinoco-0.15_rc2_pre20050516.ebuild, but mixing _rcX and _preY is not
allowe
David Klaftenegger wrote:
Georgi Georgiev wrote:
Would it be inappropriate to start bitching (again) about a flat tree
where each package can go in multiple categories?
So now, that I've read all messages in this thread, I needed a point to
start at..
I guess my approach isn't a way to go, but I
David Klaftenegger wrote:
>>>Why not just create a symlink to the package in the category it *also*
>>>should be in?
[snip]
>>It's a better approach then tagging it into the metadata imo, since it
>>forces unique cat/package still. Won't play nice if the tree's fs
>>doesn't like symlinks though
Brian Harring wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 10:28:48PM +0200, David Klaftenegger wrote:
>>Why not just create a symlink to the package in the category it *also*
>>should be in?
>>
>>For example, net-mail/mutt could be a symlink to ../mail-client/mutt,
>>allowing to find it in both categories.
>>
awww, i thought that added extra emphasis to the post history...
;)
On Monday 16 May 2005 08:41 pm, Jeffrey Forman wrote:
> Good eye, Fixed!
>
> -Jeffrey
>
> On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 09:25 +0900, Georgi Georgiev wrote:
> > Something's wrong with the tags -- the one before "Additional" is
> > never
On 5/16/05, Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>On Mon, 16 May 2005 19:45:05 -0400 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>| On Monday 16 May 2005 07:08 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> >>| > What, so that you can see which bugs a small but vocal group of
> >>| > ricers are interested in rather t
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 09:58:43AM +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Stefan Schweizer wrote:
>
> > Many bugs in bugzilla have ebuilds contributed, the work is done,
> > there is just no developer to add them to the tree and review them.
> > Bugvoting would allow other developers to see where they can
Stefan Schweizer wrote:
> Many bugs in bugzilla have ebuilds contributed, the work is done,
> there is just no developer to add them to the tree and review them.
> Bugvoting would allow other developers to see where they can help. For
> example I am using kde but dont read all kde bugs, so if I wo
55 matches
Mail list logo
