On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 19:50 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'd like to remove the latest xorg revision from package.mask by the end
of the week, so I'd appreciate testing on any ebuild regressions or
relatively simple fixups from anyone who has a
On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 18:18 -0400, Aron Griffis wrote:
Ciaran would have something to say about this, along the lines of some
packages sitting idle in ~arch state because the maintainer isn't
really paying attention. In that case, who can really blame an arch
team for moving ahead on their
On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 00:47 +0200, Lars Weiler wrote:
* Aron Griffis [EMAIL PROTECTED] [05/06/06 18:26 -0400]:
alpha
-
- looks nicer (subjective)
- easier to tell at a glance if a given keyword is in the list
I'm for this. You can easily
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi foser,
alpha++
once again, alpha++
It's not a vote, it's a discussion. You guys--.
^^^Yeah, this proofs your ability to discuss very well...
As vapier indicates he's the whole reason this ever became a problem. He
was the one who started
foser wrote:
On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 22:58 +0200, Danny van Dyk wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Luca Barbato schrieb:
Stephen P. Becker wrote:
alpha++
alpha++
once again, alpha++
It's not a vote, it's a discussion. You guys--.
Whoever said we were voting? I was
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sven Vermeulen wrote:
Many Gentoo developers have written articles about Linux and Gentoo on
third-party sites. The articles page [1] was originally meant to provide
links to those articles. However, it frequently occurs that links change
(most
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sven Vermeulen wrote:
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 09:35:26AM -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
It would still be useful to keep the titles and other info, just
removing the link. Otherwise, how are people supposed to even know the
articles exist?
On Thu, 2005-09-06 at 10:40 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sven Vermeulen wrote:
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 09:35:26AM -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
It would still be useful to keep the titles and other info, just
removing the link. Otherwise,
There have been some really interesting points brought up recently
about where is Gentoo going?
It feels like this topic comes up every year :)
I have been wondering that myself.
Some people seem to think that Gentoo has the potential to be an
enterprise player.
Maybe, maybe not ...
Stuart Herbert wrote: [Thu Jun 09 2005, 06:32:04PM EDT]
I'd like Gentoo to be a place where neat things are developed.
Aren't we really a place where neat things are packaged up?
Hopefully both! :-)
Regarding the rest of your email, I don't disagree. I think that if
you read my
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sven Vermeulen wrote:
Many Gentoo developers have written articles about Linux and Gentoo on
third-party sites. The articles page [1] was originally meant to provide
links to those articles. However, it frequently occurs
On 18:59 Thu 09 Jun , Alec Warner wrote:
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
It would still be useful to keep the titles and other info, just
removing the link. Otherwise, how are people supposed to even know the
articles exist?
Thanks,
Donnie
I have to agree here, something should be left
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/10/2005 08:44 AM, Duncan wrote:
To me, that's a valid link, one that Gentoo should be proud of. In
deleting that page, it's as if we are trying to wash away some part of our
past, the bad old days, that we are somehow ashamed of. To me,
maillog: 09/06/2005-20:14:33(-0700): Duncan types
.. snip ..
That said, there remains the practical issue of keeping links updated. I
see a couple possibilities.
One, there's the idea others floated -- note on the page the problem of
keeping links updated as to why links aren't
On Thursday 09 June 2005 20.05, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
I still fail to see why everything done by Gentoo devs belongs on the
Gentoo page. The only article that belongs on the Gentoo page is the one
about the Enoch and how it became Gentoo.
Because it's something relevant to Linux done by a
15 matches
Mail list logo
