"Josh M. Anders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> subscribe
>
> --
> Josh M. Anders, MVP, MCSE+
> Senior System Administrator
> UNIX Expert
Oh, the irony...
--
I used to think romantic love was a neurosis shared by two, a supreme
foolishness. I no longer thought that. There's nothing foolish in
lo
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 12219 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in KE
On Monday 12 September 2005 02:51, Francesco R wrote:
> Jason Stubbs wrote:
> >On Monday 12 September 2005 00:05, Francesco R wrote:
> >>http://dev.gentoo.org/~vivo/doc/mysql-update.html
> >
> >With step 2, you should probably mention the issues that can arise with
> >non-ASCII data in char fields.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 20:14:27 -0400 Peter Hyman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | Thank you for the opportunity. Apparently though, my submissions have
> | already been rejected Ciaran.
>
> As you know fine well, nothing was rej
On Sun, 2005-09-11 at 20:27 -0400, Stephen P. Becker wrote:
> > Thank you for the opportunity. Apparently though, my submissions have
> > already been rejected Ciaran. It's important to realize that the
> > submissions were intended to AID the developers, not to necessarily be
> > PERFECT in every
Thank you for the opportunity. Apparently though, my submissions have
already been rejected Ciaran. It's important to realize that the
submissions were intended to AID the developers, not to necessarily be
PERFECT in every way.
Of course they have been criticized by Ciaran. In case you didn't k
On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 20:14:27 -0400 Peter Hyman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| Thank you for the opportunity. Apparently though, my submissions have
| already been rejected Ciaran.
As you know fine well, nothing was rejected. I gave you QA feedback on
a few maintainer-wanted bugs so that you can impr
Alin Nastac wrote: [Sun Sep 11 2005, 05:02:27PM EDT]
> Gentoo history is full of such individuals who only want to be sure
> that they could become devs but are not willing to put any effort
> behind it.
Gentoo's history is full of hard-working devs.
The slackers are simply forgotten. ;-)
R
On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 00:02 +0300, Alin Nastac wrote:
snip...
> Indeed, your name is everywhere when it comes down to rox thing. Because
> your dedication on rox subject, I am willing to help you become a dev,
> but I need to be sure you are not going to dissapear in the very next
> moment.
> Gent
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 00:53:03 +0100 Ed W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Might there be an option 4 which is that a slightly different system
| might stop everyone bitching over the current one and hence avoid
| wasting some time? Nope, no idea what that would be, but the thought
| does occur when
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Tue, 06 Sep 2005 18:03:37 +0100 Ed W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| As an "outsider" reading that summary the message *I* read is that
| there is some strain over fitting the development model into
| "stable", "~", and "package.mask". I think I see people basically
| say
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 00:51:42 +0200
"Jose Luis Rivero (YosWinK)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>Is staking, poking out of the eyes and burning of hands considered a
> >>warm welcome? :-)
> >>
> >
> >
> > Must have missed a few memo's. I thought
Sven Vermeulen wrote:
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 12:21:30AM +0200, Jan Kundrát wrote:
Is staking, poking out of the eyes and burning of hands considered a
warm welcome? :-)
Must have missed a few memo's. I thought only YoswinK was allowed to do
this.
You know some people want to use my met
I've put together a kind of FAQ for the most common maintainer-wanted
problems:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm/docs/mw-faq/
The idea is to replace most of my usual bullet points in the "please
fix" list with URLs with more complete explanations.
Any additions or suggestions for changes would be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 21:36:55 +0200
Jan Kundrát <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jan Kundrát wrote:
> > Well, standard procedure is to create bugreport and assign it to the
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]; I don't know how many GDP members read every single
> > mess
Peter Hyman wrote:
>Firstly; to be asked to become a developer you should either apply to an
>opening, or just help out whether in the form of user support or filing
>bug reports - we notice frequent contributors making contributions to
>Gentoo and we attempt to reward them by giving them the chan
Jan Kundrát wrote:
> Well, standard procedure is to create bugreport and assign it to the
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; I don't know how many GDP members read every single
> message on this list :-).
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105626
--
cd /local/pub && more beer > /dev/mouth
signature.asc
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 12:42:11PM -0400, Peter Hyman wrote:
> Certainly, I am others have fulfilled this. I have emailed the two
> maintainers offering to assist. No response.
I can't speak for them. If they're non-responsive and you want to become
a developer, contact the recruiters.
> For some
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 19:46:25 +0200 Francesco R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>| > Is there any particular reason that the utf8 use flag was
>| > re-introduced rather than using the unicode use flag like everything
>| > else does (and was standardized on)?
>|
>| Because it doe
On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 19:46:25 +0200 Francesco R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > Is there any particular reason that the utf8 use flag was
| > re-introduced rather than using the unicode use flag like everything
| > else does (and was standardized on)?
|
| Because it does not "Adds support for Unicod
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Doty wrote:
| This package was due for removal on May 1 2005, having been replaced by
| media-video/spca5xx. Unless someone objects in the next 7 days, I will
| remove it from the tree.
|
going, going, gone.
- --
Jason Stubbs wrote:
>On Monday 12 September 2005 00:05, Francesco R wrote:
>
>
>>http://dev.gentoo.org/~vivo/doc/mysql-update.html
>>
>>
>
>With step 2, you should probably mention the issues that can arise with
>non-ASCII data in char fields. The character set really needs to specified
>i
Jason Wever wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Francesco R wrote:
>
> >> Please notice that MySQL-5.0 has been erroneously unmasked for few
> hours
> >> but it will return under the package.mask cover at next rsync.
> >>
> >> The MySQL herd is pleased to announce that Mysql 4.1 has been unmasked
> >> to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Francesco R wrote:
Please notice that MySQL-5.0 has been erroneously unmasked for few hours
but it will return under the package.mask cover at next rsync.
The MySQL herd is pleased to announce that Mysql 4.1 has been unmasked
to
Martin Schlemmer wrote:
[...]
>Just use bash's built-in read function:
>
>-
>local password newpasswd
># Read the password into $password
>read -sp "Please enter password: " password
># Just echo a newline so that next output start on new line
>echo
>
>
[...]
>Or something to that regards.
On Sun, 2005-09-11 at 17:50 +0200, Maurice van der Pot wrote:
> If bugs are not handled in a timely manner, it is because we're
> shorthanded. This is also the reason new ebuilds are often assigned to
> maintainer-wanted. We'd rather not add packages to portage if there is
> no developer to pick u
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 07:55:36PM +1000, Daniel wrote:
> ./media-video/mplayer/mplayer-1.0_pre6-r4.ebuild
> ./media-video/mplayer/mplayer-1.0_pre6-r5.ebuild
> ./media-video/mplayer/mplayer-1.0_pre7-r1.ebuild
> ./media-video/mplayer/mplayer-1.0_pre6-r6.ebuild
> ./media-video/mplayer/mplayer-1.0_pre
On Monday 12 September 2005 00:05, Francesco R wrote:
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~vivo/doc/mysql-update.html
With step 2, you should probably mention the issues that can arise with
non-ASCII data in char fields. The character set really needs to specified
in the dump. After the upgrade to 4.1, the
Francesco R wrote:
> Documentation herd what now ?
Well, standard procedure is to create bugreport and assign it to the
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; I don't know how many GDP members read every single
message on this list :-).
-jkt
[apologies if you get this twice; blame thunderbird and/or
suspend2-source
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 09:58:30AM -0400, Peter Hyman wrote:
> In addition, I and others have contributed ebuilds for consideration,
> and they continue to languish or are assigned to the maintainer-wanted
> alias. I have offered to produce ebuilds for review and submission. I
> was told I needed t
Francesco R wrote:
> Documentation herd what now ?
Well, standard procedure is to create bugreport and assign it to the
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; I don't know how many GDP members read every single
message on this list :-).
-jkt
--
cd /local/pub && more beer > /dev/mouth
signature.asc
Description: O
Michael Kohl wrote:
>On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 18:24:46 +0200
>Maurice van der Pot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>>Is this path going to be published somewhere or is this mail it?
>>
>>
>
>As Francesco said he won't publish a guide somewhere and I think MySQl
>is a widely used package, I decide
Several core ROX programs are out of date.
Rox bug # 102228
Rox-lib bug # 79333
Rox-clib bug # 78309
Despite the above bug reports, and copies to the current listed
maintainers, the products are not being updated.
Rox is among the easiest programs to maintain, and many ebuilds simply
need to be
To anyone out there with a bit of skill and lack of direction.
I've been meaning to do this for a while but have lost time.
A number of packages that depend on lzo don't work with lzo-2. Your mission,
if you choose to accept it, is to work out which programs:
a. won't recognise/link to the new
34 matches
Mail list logo