Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January

2006-01-02 Thread Lance Albertson
Mike Frysinger wrote: If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole Gentoo dev list to see. Gentoo has been missing some kind of direction/goal for some time now. Looking back at the last two years, what are

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January

2006-01-02 Thread Lares Moreau
On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 12:14 -0600, Lance Albertson wrote: Mike Frysinger wrote: Gentoo has been missing some kind of direction/goal for some time now. Looking back at the last two years, what are the major changes/accomplishments that we have done? Granted, I know there has been great strides

Re: [gentoo-dev] last rites for dev-libs/btparse

2006-01-02 Thread Chris Bainbridge
On 31/12/05, Carsten Lohrke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's - broken Works for me, and I can't see any bugs in bugzilla? - dead upstream Not true, mailing list is active, last post Dec 27th, and the author responds to emails. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January

2006-01-02 Thread Lance Albertson
Lares Moreau wrote: On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 12:14 -0600, Lance Albertson wrote: I have been involved with many Volunteer organisations over the last couple years. Not all computer related. Something Gentoo is notably missing is a Mission Statement. IMO a Mission statement acts as a beacon on

Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLogs and rsync time

2006-01-02 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 11:25 -0600, Lance Albertson wrote: I'm also for telling the users to rsync exclude the ChangeLogs if they don't want them instead of getting rid of them or crippling them. I don't think that's really a solution. That's just a way to minimize what they get. If you

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January

2006-01-02 Thread Patrick Lauer
On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 12:50 -0600, Lance Albertson wrote: A mission statement only goes so far. The underlying leadership has to make sure that statement is upheld and kept alive. Too many folks have a mission statement, but no one ever remembers what it is or abides by it. I guess there isn't

[gentoo-dev] developer keyring?

2006-01-02 Thread Patrick Lauer
Hi all, I'm wondering if there is an easy way to get a keyring with all developer gpg keys pushed to users. I know that carpaski had at one point put such a keyring online, but it hasn't been maintained. So right now you'd have to go through the website (fetch the keys from the roll-call page

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January

2006-01-02 Thread Lares Moreau
On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 20:03 +0100, Patrick Lauer wrote: On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 12:50 -0600, Lance Albertson wrote: A mission statement only goes so far. The underlying leadership has to make sure that statement is upheld and kept alive. Too many folks have a mission statement, but no one

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January

2006-01-02 Thread Lance Albertson
Lares Moreau wrote: Upon doing some reading about what _exactly_ Gentoo council does, it seems to me that Gentoo Council is an operations board. I think what Patrick and Lance are getting at (correct me if I'm wrong) is that we need to have some form of Governance board. A board that doesn't

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January

2006-01-02 Thread Grobian
On 02-01-2006 20:03:54 +0100, Patrick Lauer wrote: On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 12:50 -0600, Lance Albertson wrote: I guess I'm almost hinting at that Gentoo needs a single entity that's sole purpose is to drive/research the direction and goals for Gentoo. Or call it proper hierarchy. Management.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January

2006-01-02 Thread Patrick Lauer
On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 20:49 +0100, Grobian wrote: On 02-01-2006 20:03:54 +0100, Patrick Lauer wrote: On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 12:50 -0600, Lance Albertson wrote: I guess I'm almost hinting at that Gentoo needs a single entity that's sole purpose is to drive/research the direction and goals

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January

2006-01-02 Thread Lance Albertson
Patrick Lauer wrote: On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 12:50 -0600, Lance Albertson wrote: A mission statement only goes so far. The underlying leadership has to make sure that statement is upheld and kept alive. Too many folks have a mission statement, but no one ever remembers what it is or abides by it.

Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLogs and rsync time

2006-01-02 Thread Lance Albertson
Chris Gianelloni wrote: On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 11:25 -0600, Lance Albertson wrote: I'm also for telling the users to rsync exclude the ChangeLogs if they don't want them instead of getting rid of them or crippling them. I don't think that's really a solution. That's just a way to minimize what

Re: [gentoo-dev] What to do with GCC 4 related bugs?

2006-01-02 Thread Mark Loeser
Chris White [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: On Monday 02 January 2006 17:01, Dirk Heinrichs wrote: Hi, I recently switched to GCC 4.0.2. A handful of packages didn't (re-)compile during emerge -e system and emerge -e world. Is there a big GCC 4 related bug in bugzilla where I can report those

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January

2006-01-02 Thread Grobian
On 02-01-2006 21:12:03 +0100, Patrick Lauer wrote: If it isn't one person, then you would need to find two persons or even more that are completely aligned and have the same visions. Since leaders usually are charismatic and controversial where necessary to achieve their goals, it is hard

Re: [gentoo-dev] What to do with GCC 4 related bugs?

2006-01-02 Thread Mark Loeser
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: On Monday 02 January 2006 09:01, Dirk Heinrichs wrote: I recently switched to GCC 4.0.2. A handful of packages didn't (re-)compile during emerge -e system and emerge -e world. Is there a big GCC 4 related bug in bugzilla where I can report

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January

2006-01-02 Thread Lance Albertson
Grobian wrote: On 02-01-2006 21:12:03 +0100, Patrick Lauer wrote: We already have a mission statement - to produce the best software distribution, ever ;-) Wether it should be Linux only, GNU-based or a metadistribution is a rather touchy subject, so please try to keep the discussion civilized

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January

2006-01-02 Thread Andrew Muraco
Chandler Carruth wrote: Lance Albertson wrote: Yeah, maybe so :-) Reflecting on this more, I see that most of the council members are a very important part of the active Gentoo development model (toolchain, etc). They need to keep those roles active as much as possible, then help on the

Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLogs and rsync time

2006-01-02 Thread Peter Volkov (pva)
On Вск, 2006-01-01 at 21:35 +0100, Francesco Riosa wrote: We have currently 10371 ChangeLog files, 25 MB totally . 1365 == 13% with size = 4096 B, 12 MB totally rsync from emerge --sync has --whole-file between its options, that mean transfer the whole file if changed. 2) rotate

[gentoo-dev] New Developer: Tobias Matzat (SirSeoman)

2006-01-02 Thread Danny van Dyk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all! Please help me to welcome Tobias Matzat aka SirSeoman who just entered the ranks of Gentoo Developers. Tobias is our new German GWN Translator. He is 25 years old and lives in Trier where he studies computer science at the Trier University

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January

2006-01-02 Thread Patrick Lauer
On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 15:03 -0600, Lance Albertson wrote: Lance mentioned something about what he sees is a niche where Gentoo does quite well. Produce the best software distribution, ever sounds a bit vague to me. That's why I agree with Lance for now. Maybe after a little research,

Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLogs and rsync time

2006-01-02 Thread Paweł Madej
Ok then i suggest to add such input to Gentoo Manual that users not interested in reading changelogs could mask them by rsync_excludes */*/ChangeLog Greets Pawel Madej -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLogs and rsync time

2006-01-02 Thread Francesco Riosa
Ok, last shoot, then let put this stuff to sleep. Description of the attachment at the end: Chris Gianelloni wrote: On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 11:25 -0600, Lance Albertson wrote: I'm also for telling the users to rsync exclude the ChangeLogs if they don't want them instead of getting rid of them

Re: [gentoo-dev] developer keyring?

2006-01-02 Thread Tom Martin
On Mon, 02 Jan 2006 20:10:46 +0100 Patrick Lauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So right now you'd have to go through the website (fetch the keys from the roll-call page ... if you remember where that is) and import them one by one (time-consuming). Any automation of that process would be really

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: shoving utils from xpdf to poppler...

2006-01-02 Thread Luis F. Araujo
Spider (DmD Lj) wrote: On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 10:35 +0100, Alexandre Buisse wrote: After my last sync, I have this new block between evince and xpdf, which is a problem at least to me. Isn't there any way to make xpdf and poppler live together on the same system? Yeah. : ) See,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January

2006-01-02 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 10:52:43PM +0100, Patrick Lauer wrote: I wonder ... can we have one precise mission statement without alienating a big part of our user base? To copy another opensource group's mission statement, Total World Domination Hey, it's been working for them so far,

Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLogs and rsync time

2006-01-02 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Lance Albertson wrote: | See the part that I said make sense to take out. What you described is | a perfect example of something that needs to stay. All I'm getting at is | that minor things that the package maintainer thinks isn't important to |

Re: [gentoo-dev] developer keyring?

2006-01-02 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 08:10:46PM +0100, Patrick Lauer wrote: Any automation of that process would be really appreciated :-) I've got a script that generates it from the rollcall data, as part of the keyring signing stuff. I'll attach it tommorrow (limited Net access at the moment, between

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January

2006-01-02 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Lance Albertson wrote: | Mike Frysinger wrote: | | |If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even |vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole |Gentoo dev list to see. | | | Gentoo has been missing some kind

Re: [gentoo-dev] What to do with GCC 4 related bugs?

2006-01-02 Thread Dirk Heinrichs
Am Montag, 2. Januar 2006 21:45 schrieb ext Mark Loeser: Chris White [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: The policy is pretty much if it doesn't compile, you get to fix it. If you have a patch then report it to bugzilla. Actually, since I plan on moving this to ~arch soon, please report all bugs to

Re: [gentoo-dev] What to do with GCC 4 related bugs?

2006-01-02 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 03 January 2006 01:43, Dirk Heinrichs wrote: Am Montag, 2. Januar 2006 21:45 schrieb ext Mark Loeser: Chris White [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: The policy is pretty much if it doesn't compile, you get to fix it. If you have a patch then report it to bugzilla. Actually, since I

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: shoving utils from xpdf to poppler...

2006-01-02 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
On Tuesday 03 January 2006 04:30, Luis F. Araujo wrote: Now if i change to =app-text/xpdf-3.01-r4 , it works just fine. But you significantly change its meaning. I am not sure what it is happening here though... is the ! notation broken? Portage does not resolve block correctly, look at

[gentoo-dev] What to do with GCC 4 related bugs?

2006-01-02 Thread Dirk Heinrichs
Hi, I recently switched to GCC 4.0.2. A handful of packages didn't (re-)compile during emerge -e system and emerge -e world. Is there a big GCC 4 related bug in bugzilla where I can report those problems or should I write one report for each package? Thanx... Dirk -- Dirk Heinrichs

Re: [gentoo-dev] X.Org 7.0 Release

2006-01-02 Thread Shyam Mani
John Myers wrote: Here's one I smashed together just now: Thanks, this is now up at [1] and [2]. I just made a few minor changes. [1] http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/?catid=upgrade [2] http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/modular-x-howto.xml Regards, -- Shyam Mani | [EMAIL PROTECTED] docs-team |

Re: [gentoo-dev] What to do with GCC 4 related bugs?

2006-01-02 Thread Chris White
On Monday 02 January 2006 17:01, Dirk Heinrichs wrote: Hi, I recently switched to GCC 4.0.2. A handful of packages didn't (re-)compile during emerge -e system and emerge -e world. Is there a big GCC 4 related bug in bugzilla where I can report those problems or should I write one report for

Re: [gentoo-dev] What to do with GCC 4 related bugs?

2006-01-02 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
On Monday 02 January 2006 09:01, Dirk Heinrichs wrote: I recently switched to GCC 4.0.2. A handful of packages didn't (re-)compile during emerge -e system and emerge -e world. Is there a big GCC 4 related bug in bugzilla where I can report those problems or should I write one report for each

Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLogs and rsync time

2006-01-02 Thread Francesco Riosa
Andrej Kacian wrote: On Sun, 01 Jan 2006 21:35:34 +0100 Francesco Riosa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thoughts ? It's doable in some way ? Whatever way will get chosen, a full copy of every ChangeLog should be made available somewhere (somewhere other than CVS Attic), for future reference.

Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLogs and rsync time

2006-01-02 Thread Francesco Riosa
Grobian wrote: On 01-01-2006 21:35:34 +0100, Francesco Riosa wrote with possible deletions: The information contained in the ChangeLogs is essential, and it must be kept, but, force the users to download all that data it's not optimal. That said I can see only two ways to reduce the ChangeLog

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: shoving utils from xpdf to poppler...

2006-01-02 Thread Alexandre Buisse
On Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 14:08:18 +0100, Carsten Lohrke wrote: On Wednesday 28 December 2005 17:32, you wrote: It's not supposed to break runtime dependencies.  Everything that was installed before is installed now, in the same location. But installed by another package. Of course it

Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLogs and rsync time

2006-01-02 Thread Francesco Riosa
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Sun, 01 Jan 2006 21:35:34 +0100 Francesco Riosa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | That said I can see only two ways to reduce the ChangeLog files (a | centralized one is obviously not viable) 5) Anyone who really cares can use the excludes list, and check the ChangeLogs

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: shoving utils from xpdf to poppler...

2006-01-02 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
On Monday 02 January 2006 10:35, Alexandre Buisse wrote: Isn't there any way to make xpdf and poppler live together on the same system? emerge unmerge xpdf emerge -u poppler emerge xpdf -- Diego Flameeyes Pettenò - http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/ Gentoo/ALT lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: shoving utils from xpdf to poppler...

2006-01-02 Thread Carsten Lohrke
On Monday 02 January 2006 10:35, Alexandre Buisse wrote: Isn't there any way to make xpdf and poppler live together on the same system? This is not about not being able to run both xpdf and poppler on one system. The blocker exists, because one ebuild of one package installs now files

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: shoving utils from xpdf to poppler...

2006-01-02 Thread Spider (DmD Lj)
On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 10:35 +0100, Alexandre Buisse wrote: After my last sync, I have this new block between evince and xpdf, which is a problem at least to me. Isn't there any way to make xpdf and poppler live together on the same system? Yeah. : ) See, poppler blocks against -older-

Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLogs and rsync time

2006-01-02 Thread Paweł Madej
Francesco Riosa wrote: yes but this excludes totally the ChangeLogs. Having the latest changes handy may be useful. Simply trying to equilibrate benefits and disadvantages, for desktop user that care on changelogs only when emerge fail and the network administrator that has a local rsync mirror

Re: [gentoo-dev] PHP Memcached APIs, last rites for dev-libs/memcached-api-php

2006-01-02 Thread Lisa Seelye
On Thu, 2005-12-29 at 11:53 +, Lisa Seelye wrote: For a while the memcached community has had several PHP APIs. The first one is represented in dev-libs/memcached-api-php and a more recent (and maintained) version is a PECL version (dev-php4/pecl-memcache and dev-php5/memcache in the

[gentoo-dev] h264/x264 global useflag

2006-01-02 Thread Luca Barbato
I'm thinking about adding an h264 useflag in the global scope, it will be used by an handful of media project in a relatively short time. Please tell me if you like the idea or not. lu -- Luca Barbato Gentoo/linux Developer Gentoo/PPC Operational Leader

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Unified nVidia Driver Ebuild ready for testing

2006-01-02 Thread Tres Melton
On Sun, 2006-01-01 at 01:12 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 12:54:21 -0500 Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 13:40 -0500, Peter wrote: | This is because glx has kernel as a dependency. Can't have it both | ways (as someone else here pointed

Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLogs and rsync time

2006-01-02 Thread Matti Bickel
Pawe?? Madej [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As a common user with ADSL 256kbps all additional data downloaded via rsync causes longer wait for syncing. If I want to see a changelog i go to packages.gentoo.org and read it. As i got Gentoo for about 10 months I don't remember if I read Changelog via

[gentoo-dev] Re: h264/x264 global useflag

2006-01-02 Thread Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.-
On Mon, 2 Jan 2006, Luca Barbato wrote: I'm thinking about adding an h264 useflag in the global scope, it will be used by an handful of media project in a relatively short time. Please tell me if you like the idea or not. Seems like a local use flag would be more suitable if it's only going

Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLogs and rsync time

2006-01-02 Thread Francesco Riosa
Matti Bickel wrote: Pawe?? Madej [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As a common user with ADSL 256kbps all additional data downloaded via rsync causes longer wait for syncing. If I want to see a changelog i go to packages.gentoo.org and read it. As i got Gentoo for about 10 months I don't remember if I

Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLogs and rsync time

2006-01-02 Thread Matti Bickel
Francesco Riosa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Matti Bickel wrote: Pawe?? Madej [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As a common user with ADSL 256kbps all additional data downloaded via rsync causes longer wait for syncing. If I want to see a changelog i go to packages.gentoo.org and read it. As i got

Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLogs and rsync time

2006-01-02 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 05:37:48PM +0100, Francesco Riosa wrote: Do you read every time the whole ChangeLog ? If not, generally, how much of it ? I often find myself grepping through the entire ChangeLog too see when and who introduced a particular change in an ebuild - but I normally do this

Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLogs and rsync time

2006-01-02 Thread Lance Albertson
Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 05:37:48PM +0100, Francesco Riosa wrote: Do you read every time the whole ChangeLog ? If not, generally, how much of it ? I often find myself grepping through the entire ChangeLog too see when and who introduced a particular change in

[gentoo-portage-dev] default USE flags in IUSE

2006-01-02 Thread Alec Warner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Disclaimer: This is nowhere near done, mostly looking to start a conversation with people about stuff it's missing, and ways to improve, mostly it was a proof of concept. However please try it out and play with it a bit, find issues, etc.. included

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] default USE flags in IUSE

2006-01-02 Thread Lares Moreau
On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 16:10 -0500, Alec Warner wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Disclaimer: This is nowhere near done, mostly looking to start a conversation with people about stuff it's missing, and ways to improve, mostly it was a proof of concept. However please try

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] default USE flags in IUSE

2006-01-02 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 02 January 2006 18:58, Lares Moreau wrote: I would like to have the option to opt-out of having these flags enabled. This way, the average user would not need to worry about enabling flags, and the advanced user (opting out) doesn't have 'magic' happen behind their back. said