On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 12:18:10 -0700,
Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stuart Herbert wrote:
Any chance of per-package USE defaults support? That's much more
useful to me.
Attached to bug 61732 there's a patch that implements this via a
On 8/9/06, Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
General problem with use deps; *could* still implement it via
seperating out use specific restrictions and generating the second
logic statement above, but that's bit magic imo.
Is it really magic? Admittedly I know exactly nothing about
On Tuesday 08 August 2006 22:36, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
As an end user and also an administrator, I am very pleased to see
this laid out so clearly. I mean, I knew it, but it seems like it
needs to be yelled once in a while...
hmm, now that I know of these flags, I can take a look at them
On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 14:24 +0200, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
On Tuesday 08 August 2006 22:36, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
As an end user and also an administrator, I am very pleased to see
this laid out so clearly. I mean, I knew it, but it seems like it
needs to be yelled once in a while...
Well, we don't yet have reliable software in place to _count_ votes,
but that's no reason not to start collecting them. The polls are now
open, and will remain so until UTC 20060911 (one month). To vote,
log into dev.g.o and type votify --help for instructions. If you run
into any
On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 10:57 -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote:
Well, we don't yet have reliable software in place to _count_ votes,
but that's no reason not to start collecting them. The polls are now
open, and will remain so until UTC 20060911 (one month). To vote,
log into dev.g.o and type
On Thu, 2006-10-08 at 10:57 -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote:
Well, we don't yet have reliable software in place to _count_ votes,
but that's no reason not to start collecting them. The polls are now
open, and will remain so until UTC 20060911 (one month). To vote,
log into dev.g.o and type
Olivier Crete wrote:
It was chosen by brad_mssw to match the way it is done on ia64. And I
think we should continue to put the binary
app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-* in /emul/ and that lib32 should be
reserved for properly installed packages using portage whenever we
manage to get portage to
Christel Doty wrote: [Thu Aug 10 2006, 12:34:50PM CDT]
Sure, just let me know what you need me to do Grant :)
Thanks! Um, I'm not quite sure what's going to be needed just yet,
but I'll keep you informed.
-g2boojum-
PS. With three election officials, we probably have enough now.
--
Grant
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Olivier Crete wrote:
It was chosen by brad_mssw to match the way it is done on ia64. And I
think we should continue to put the binary
app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-* in /emul/ and that lib32 should be
reserved for properly
Olivier Crete wrote:
I volunteer (again).. What's the status on the search for voting
software ?
We follow two trails : fixing countify or find something else. I'll have
a look at countify, but more monkey eyeballs can't hurt.
We didn't find a good alternative yet, so you can also help in
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 10:57:14AM -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote:
Well, we don't yet have reliable software in place to _count_ votes,
but that's no reason not to start collecting them. The polls are now
open, and will remain so until UTC 20060911 (one month). To vote,
log into dev.g.o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 10:57:14AM -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote:
Well, we don't yet have reliable software in place to _count_ votes,
but that's no reason not to start collecting them. The polls are now
open, and will remain so
Hi everybody,
I propose the `emerge --info` included in arch testers' comments on
stabilisation bugs should rather be posted as attachments. The AT
comments clog up the bugs and are usually not interesting at all to devs
other than those who are arch devs for the relevant arches. It would
On Thursday 10 August 2006 21:42, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 10:57:14AM -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote:
Well, we don't yet have reliable software in place to _count_ votes,
but that's no reason not to start collecting them. The polls are now
open, and will remain so until UTC
Olivier Crete wrote: [Thu Aug 10 2006, 11:42:14AM CDT]
On Thu, 2006-10-08 at 10:57 -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote:
I volunteer (again).. What's the status on the search for voting
software ?
Well, fmccor has suggested STV[1], so the current plan is to use
countify to assemble the usual master
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 10:42:47 -0700
Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the current election name that we should use when running
votify?
To vote, log into dev.g.o and type votify --help for
instructions.
Doing that explained everything. :)
Kind regards,
JeR
--
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 19:50:55 +0200
Jeroen Roovers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I propose the `emerge --info` included in arch testers' comments on
stabilisation bugs should rather be posted as attachments. The AT
comments clog up the bugs and are usually not interesting at all to devs
other than
Greg KH wrote: [Thu Aug 10 2006, 12:42:47PM CDT]
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 10:57:14AM -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote:
Well, we don't yet have reliable software in place to _count_ votes,
but that's no reason not to start collecting them. The polls are now
open, and will remain so until UTC
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 08:00:25PM +0200, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 10:42:47 -0700
Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the current election name that we should use when running
votify?
To vote, log into dev.g.o and type votify --help for
instructions.
Doing
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 12:26:10 -0500
Mike Doty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Olivier Crete wrote:
It was chosen by brad_mssw to match the way it is done on ia64.
And I think we should continue to put the binary
On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 21:49 +0200, Danny van Dyk wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 10. August 2006 18:51 schrieb Grant Goodyear:
Olivier Crete wrote: [Thu Aug 10 2006, 11:42:14AM CDT]
On Thu, 2006-10-08 at 10:57 -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote:
I volunteer (again).. What's the status on the search for
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 20:03:26 + Ferris McCormick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| So the glue is rather easy; problem is the specific balloting
| method. STV supports several protocols for selecting some number of
| winners from a list of candidates, but Condorcet is not among them,
| because
On Thursday 10 August 2006 15:42, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 12:26:10 -0500
Mike Doty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Olivier Crete wrote:
It makes sense that you wouldn't want these binary packages going
On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 21:11 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 20:03:26 + Ferris McCormick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| So the glue is rather easy; problem is the specific balloting
| method. STV supports several protocols for selecting some number of
| winners from a list of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: MD5
Grant Goodyear wrote:
Well, we don't yet have reliable software in place to _count_ votes,
but that's no reason not to start collecting them. The polls are now
open, and will remain so until UTC 20060911 (one month). To vote,
log into
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 14:44:13 -0400
Thomas Cort [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 19:50:55 +0200
Jeroen Roovers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I propose the `emerge --info` included in arch testers' comments on
stabilisation bugs should rather be posted as attachments. The AT
Thomas Cort [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do arch testers need to post `emerge --info` if everything works?
Shouldn't we be able to trust that they have sane CFLAGS, proper
FEATURES, and an up to date system?
Once there was the idea of putting AT testing system specs somewhere, so arch
devs
Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
Noack, Sebastian wrote:
Hi,
I have a Palm Zire 71 device, with Palm OS on it and a 400 MHz
ARM-Processor in it. Actually I don't use this device anymore, so if
somebody wants try to get Gentoo Linux run on it, I would give it to him.
There is an SD/MMC-Slot which
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 23:58:46 +0200
Kevin F. Quinn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's not about trust, it's about knowing what the CFLAGS/FEATURES
were. That way if someone else reports a failure, you can compare the
reports and see what differences might be triggering the fault.
I get that
On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 12:26 -0500, Mike Doty wrote:
We're getting to the point where most emul stuff could be made obsolete.
The amd64 team is having a meeting next week and I'll bring the point up.
Just don't screw over games in the process. ;]
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering -
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 23:58:46 +0200
Kevin F. Quinn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem with attachments is that processing the report takes
longer
- you have to go to the web to read the attachment to find out what
config worked (or failed, if that was the case). It's best to have it
On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 18:29 -0400, Thomas Cort wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 23:58:46 +0200
Kevin F. Quinn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's not about trust, it's about knowing what the CFLAGS/FEATURES
were. That way if someone else reports a failure, you can compare the
reports and see what
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006, Matti Bickel wrote:
Thomas Cort [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do arch testers need to post `emerge --info` if everything works?
Shouldn't we be able to trust that they have sane CFLAGS, proper
FEATURES, and an up to date
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 10 August 2006 12:48, Olivier Crete wrote:
And I think we should continue to put the binary
app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-* in /emul/ and that lib32 should be
reserved for properly installed packages using portage whenever we
manage to get portage to support
On Thursday 10 August 2006 19:32, Doug Goldstein wrote:
Also, I can probably hit brad_mssw for you if you want. Since I work
with him now.
hindsight is 20/20 eh ? no point in blaming people for decisions made when
at the time, said decisions were the best
-mike
pgp0p9SR79Nsv.pgp
Ferris McCormick wrote:
(By the way, if the ballots from council2005 are still around, and if
someone can make them anonymous (convert names to something like C1, C2,
etc.), I can take them and show what results STV would give, if you'd
like a controlled test.)
Please see the following -core
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 10 August 2006 15:42, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
More generally we have varying approaches to pre-built packages;
app-office/openoffice-bin installs to /usr for example, while
mail-client/mozilla-thunderbird-bin and www-client/mozilla-firefox-bin
install to /opt.
Matti Bickel [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Thu, 10 Aug 2006 23:59:51 +0200:
Thomas Cort [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do arch testers need to post `emerge --info` if everything works?
Shouldn't we be able to trust that they have sane CFLAGS, proper
FEATURES,
39 matches
Mail list logo
