Robin H. Johnson wrote:
There isn't one yet, but proctors@ or reporting on BugZilla will
probably work fine as soon as kingtaco and kloeri actually get the
initial proctors together.
In all seriousness I propose [EMAIL PROTECTED] - I am not trying to start a
bidding war here for names, so
Mauricio Lima Pilla wrote:
We are always ready to listen to feedback and constructive criticism, but
your constant trolling against the forums can't be classified as such.
IMO ciaran has definitely been trolling this list and it's doing my head in.
Is there anyone else who feels the same,
There's a difference between UI improvements like FEATURES=candy and UI
improvements like ability to do dependency-based uninstalls (merely one
example). UI improvements that improve user experience substantially
are fine. Minor UI improvements are good too, but not when they're
being touted
Robin H. Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on
Thu, 15 Mar 2007 22:07:45 -0700:
I think you missed one thing. From the council page: Only Gentoo
developers may be nominated Thus your corner-case of a moderator that
does nothing else wanting to become a
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 09:28:10AM +, Duncan wrote:
I think you missed one thing. From the council page: Only Gentoo
developers may be nominated Thus your corner-case of a moderator that
does nothing else wanting to become a council member is not valid,
because the moderator is not a
Steve Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 16 Mar 2007 08:41:50
+:
Mauricio Lima Pilla wrote:
We are always ready to listen to feedback and constructive criticism,
but your constant trolling against the forums can't be classified as
such.
IMO
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Long wrote:
Mauricio Lima Pilla wrote:
We are always ready to listen to feedback and constructive criticism, but
your constant trolling against the forums can't be classified as such.
IMO ciaran has definitely been trolling this list and
Jakob Buchgraber wrote:
Why don't you join the portage team and try to persuade the current
portage devs and help to implement the killer features?
The main problem with such projects is that you cannot do some stuff in
an easy way, that's the reason you have from scratch rewrite of 2.0
Jason Stubbs wrote:
That's not entirely true. The main trouble with refactoring portage code is
that there is no defined public API and so even the littlest changes are
likely to break things in gentoolkit and several of the portage gui front end
packages.
What about branching, doing the
On 16/03/07, Steve Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mauricio Lima Pilla wrote:
We are always ready to listen to feedback and constructive criticism, but
your constant trolling against the forums can't be classified as such.
IMO ciaran has definitely been trolling this list and it's doing my head
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 08:41:50 +
Steve Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMO ciaran has definitely been trolling this list and it's doing my
head in. Is there anyone else who feels the same, strongly enough to
risk his ire?
If you think Ciaran is trolling, just ignore him. Be part of the
I'd just like to say good job and thanks, to all involved in the CoC.
--
Kevin F. Quinn
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Friday 16 March 2007 18:58, Luca Barbato wrote:
Jason Stubbs wrote:
That's not entirely true. The main trouble with refactoring portage code
is that there is no defined public API and so even the littlest changes
are likely to break things in gentoolkit and several of the portage gui
Hi all,
Yesterday the Emacs Project Overlay has been created on
overlays.gentoo.org and is accessible through Layman $(layman -a
emacs). What's new?
* An eselect module for Emacs to control the version of Emacs you use
** changes the target of /usr/bin/emacs which up to now simply took the
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 08:44:02 + Steve Long
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's a difference between UI improvements like FEATURES=candy
and UI improvements like ability to do dependency-based uninstalls
(merely one example). UI improvements that improve user experience
substantially are
darren kirby wrote:
Exactly. LSBs insistence on using RPM as the One True Package Manager seems
incredibly daft to me. It was RPM-hell that steered me towards Gentoo all
those years ago in the first place. I cannot put into words how much I loathe
RPM.
Seems to me if Gentoo wholesale
On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 20:17 -0400, Daniel Drake wrote:
Now look at the LKML. It's often hard to find general discussion behind
the truckloads of patches and river of technical review emails. A large
proportion of the content is not understandable unless you have a good
knowledge of C,
On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 00:50 +, Steve Long wrote:
Jakob Buchgraber wrote:
So I just think something has to be changed e.g. making paludis an
official gentoo project and mentioning it in the docs, but keep portage
as the default pm.
If portage can't get improved, then people have to get
On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 13:33 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
Also part of the maturity point. Perhaps we all just need to grow up? ;)
I do think we have a significantly lower average age than the Linux
Kernel developer group. This probably plays a significant role in how
things go on around here.
On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 04:35 +, Duncan wrote:
* If you perceive a breach of the Code of Conduct guidelines, let the
proctors know. How? The council's email address is given for appeals,
but no general proctor address is listed. (At least none that I saw, even
after searching, so if
On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 09:28 +, Duncan wrote:
If it's not correct, that they are staff and /not/ devs, therefore /not/
eligible for council, then I've misunderstood. Apologies for the noise.
Staff are devs and are eligible for the Council just as much as Infra
are staff and eligible for
Hiya all,
It is that time of the year again, and we have yet once more been
accepted as a mentoring organisation for SoC.
Interested mentors (current Gentoo developers) should fill in the mentor
application (link sent to -core). Interested mentors, co-mentors, people
with project ideas and
* Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] [07/03/12 16:36 -0700]:
app-cdr/cdrkit/cdrkit-1.0.ebuild:26:
app-cdr/cdrkit/cdrkit-1.1.2.ebuild:28:
Those are fixed.
Regards, Lars
--
Lars Weiler [EMAIL PROTECTED] +49-171-1963258
Instant Messaging : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux PowerPC : Strategical
On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 13:45 -0700, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
Larry Lines wrote:
I learned Linux by
installing and hacking and suffering over Gentoo. Exactly one year
after installing Gentoo, I was in Hong Kong building and programming for
a Linux cluster. There is no other
Also part of the maturity point. Perhaps we all just need to grow up? ;)
Very likely, but how? I think my own opinion was best expressed by John
Galsworthy (or Soames Forsyte of the Forsyte Saga): One of these days
they’d try and bring in Prohibition, he shouldn’t wonder; but that cock
On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 19:15 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 12 March 2007, Mike Frysinger wrote:
instead, since we require bash for our ebuilds, use the builtin `type -p`
err i botched that ;)
`type -p` is almost a complete drop in replacement for which ... it does not
work on
Ned Ludd wrote:
Here are the remaining offenders for sync 1174037821 that match
'$(which ' or '`which ' in eclasses and ebuilds.
dev-db/hsqldb/hsqldb-1.7.3.1-r1.ebuild:48:
This one just echos which to a script so it's safe I think.
Regards,
Petteri
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
After reviewing
http://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/file-format/index.html#file-naming-rules
I still seem to be having to finagle version names for some packages. At
the moment it would be nice if we also had the following suffixes
available
_dev
Apache upstream, specifically
Am Freitag, 16. März 2007 23:16 schrieb Ned Ludd:
On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 19:15 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 12 March 2007, Mike Frysinger wrote:
Here are the remaining offenders for sync 1174037821 that match
'$(which ' or '`which ' in eclasses and ebuilds.
Ned Ludd wrote:
Here are the remaining offenders for sync 1174037821 that match
'$(which ' or '`which ' in eclasses and ebuilds.
eclass/mysql.eclass:529:
eclass/mysql.eclass:530:
media-libs/pdflib/pdflib-5.0.4_p1-r1.ebuild:39:
media-libs/pdflib/pdflib-6.0.3-r1.ebuild:48:
On Wednesday 14 March 2007, Christian Bricart wrote:
Tupone Alfredo schrieb:
games-rpg has been masked on 18 jul 2006 and there is a pending bug
#167547 Broken dependancies in games-rpg/planeshift-0.3.011
Removing is planned for this end of week: 17 Mar 2007.
0.3.011 is wy t old
There's absolutely no reason to absorb every single version naming scheme on
earth. Gentoo's does work nicely and more than we have would only be
irritating to the user. Simply use _predatecode or whatever fits, but
extending our naming scheme is unneeded and pointless.
Carsten
On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 00:11 +0100, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
There's absolutely no reason to absorb every single version naming scheme on
earth. Gentoo's does work nicely and more than we have would only be
irritating to the user. Simply use _predatecode or whatever fits, but
extending our
On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 00:11:43 +0100
Carsten Lohrke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's absolutely no reason to absorb every single version naming
scheme on earth. Gentoo's does work nicely and more than we have
would only be irritating to the user. Simply use _predatecode or
whatever fits, but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Just a note to this. I'm co-maintainer of netbeans ebuild. Netbeans does
milestone releases. These are pretty stable and usable since milestone 7
of netbeans 6.0 with many new features that make sense to use the
milestone releases. I have to name the
On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 23:46 +, Stephen Bennett wrote:
On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 00:11:43 +0100
Carsten Lohrke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's absolutely no reason to absorb every single version naming
scheme on earth. Gentoo's does work nicely and more than we have
would only be
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 20:00:51 -0400
William L. Thomson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Understandable for sure. Thus not really putting any sort of time
frame on implementation. Maybe EAPI=1 or beyond. Up to others that
would implement it. Just was tossing it out there, providing some
feedback.
William L. Thomson Jr. said the following:
Well that's the problem. When I use say _pre instead of _dev it gives
off the wrong impression to users judging package by it's name. Since
it's not a pre-release. A user may go upstream looking for some sort of
pre-release. Which they won't find.
On Friday 16 March 2007, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
Well that's the problem. When I use say _pre instead of _dev it gives
off the wrong impression to users judging package by it's name. Since
it's not a pre-release. A user may go upstream looking for some sort of
pre-release. Which they
On Friday 16 March 2007, Miroslav Šulc (fordfrog) wrote:
Just a note to this. I'm co-maintainer of netbeans ebuild. Netbeans does
milestone releases. These are pretty stable and usable since milestone 7
of netbeans 6.0 with many new features that make sense to use the
milestone releases. I
On Wednesday 14 March 2007, Caleb Cushing wrote:
Perhaps they're more
interested in generating ad revenue from whipped-up scandals...
or maybe they have a point. distrowatch hpd ranking show's us down from a
few years ago we were
those rankings are less significant/accurate than slashdot
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 18:25:17 -0400
William L. Thomson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hierarchy would be the following
snapshot - dev - build - alpha - beta
And that's where the problems start. As you said yourself _snapshot is
something universal so it doesn't really fit anywhere in the
On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 21:23 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 16 March 2007, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
Well that's the problem. When I use say _pre instead of _dev it gives
off the wrong impression to users judging package by it's name. Since
it's not a pre-release. A user may go
On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 03:11 +0100, Marius Mauch wrote:
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 18:25:17 -0400
William L. Thomson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hierarchy would be the following
snapshot - dev - build - alpha - beta
And that's where the problems start. As you said yourself _snapshot is
William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 03:11 +0100, Marius Mauch wrote:
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 18:25:17 -0400
William L. Thomson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hierarchy would be the following
snapshot - dev - build - alpha - beta
And that's where the problems start. As you
Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri,
16 Mar 2007 09:23:31 -0400:
On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 04:35 +, Duncan wrote:
* If you perceive a breach of the Code of Conduct guidelines, let the
proctors know. How? [N]o general proctor address is
Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri,
16 Mar 2007 09:30:41 -0400:
On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 09:28 +, Duncan wrote:
If it's not correct, that they are staff and /not/ devs, therefore
/not/ eligible for council, then I've misunderstood. Apologies
47 matches
Mail list logo
