On Saturday 17 March 2007, Steve Long wrote:
Piotr Jaroszy?ski wrote:
I have heard about the magic limit of 5, but whatever...
Is there a *technical* objection then to server?
if you're going to change the topic mid-thread, then you should update the
subject
you already know the state of
On Donnerstag, 15. März 2007, Matthias Schwarzott wrote:
Hi fellows!
2. I think we should get udev rules directory (/etc/udev/rules.d/) a bit
more cleaned up.
At the moment a lot of packages install their files prefixed with 99.
I does not like that, and in the future that should perhaps
maillog: 18/03/2007-10:57:01(+0100): Matthias Schwarzott types
On Donnerstag, 15. März 2007, Matthias Schwarzott wrote:
Hi fellows!
2. I think we should get udev rules directory (/etc/udev/rules.d/) a bit
more cleaned up.
At the moment a lot of packages install their files prefixed
Many applications save preferences in ~/.app/. When testing
applications please make sure you test with an empty directory to catch
cases when an upgrade works fine but a clean install doesn't. Thanks.
Regards,
Petteri
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Petteri Räty wrote:
Many applications save preferences in ~/.app/. When testing
applications please make sure you test with an empty directory to catch
cases when an upgrade works fine but a clean install doesn't. Thanks.
Even better: Fix them to use ~/.config/app instead, so they don't
Simon Stelling wrote:
Even better: Fix them to use ~/.config/app instead, so they don't
clutter up the home unnecessarily :)
Won't it change how the vanilla upstream version and the one from portage
behave? IMHO such changes are not a good idea.
--
Krzysiek Pawlik nelchael at gentoo.org
Hi,
Won't that break configs/increase clutter for people who share their home
directories between two distributions since they'll have to restort to
symlinks to make stuff work?
I myself have gentoo and ubuntu installed and am sharing my home directory
between them. I have to use ubuntu for
Krzysiek Pawlik kirjoitti:
Simon Stelling wrote:
Even better: Fix them to use ~/.config/app instead, so they don't
clutter up the home unnecessarily :)
Won't it change how the vanilla upstream version and the one from portage
behave? IMHO such changes are not a good idea.
Just send the
On 18/03/07, Nirbheek Chauhan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Won't that break configs/increase clutter for people who share their home
directories between two distributions since they'll have to restort to
symlinks to make stuff work?
I myself have gentoo and ubuntu installed and am sharing my
On 2007/03/18, Simon Stelling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even better: Fix them to use ~/.config/app instead
You mean ${XDG_CONFIG_HOME:-${HOME}/.config}/app, right?
http://standards.freedesktop.org/basedir-spec/latest/ar01s03.html
--
TGL.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Sunday 18 of March 2007 13:37:55 Jeff Rollin wrote:
Also, if you have a .config directory to put all these files in, ~
becomes less cluttered but ~/.config becomes VERY cluttered!
Nothing prevents from making appdirs in .config too.
--
Best Regards,
Piotr Jaroszyński
--
# Raúl Porcel armin76 at gentoo dot org (18 Mar 2007)
# Pending removal 17 May 2007, for treecleaners
# www-servers/ncsa-httpd - bug 122134
# net-im/aim-transport - bug 145858
www-servers/ncsa-httpd
net-im/aim-transport
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Hi,
The mozilla team has decided that the
www-client/mozilla-firefox[-bin]-1.5* series will get masked two weeks
from now (18 Mar 2007), that is 1 April 2007. And will be
removed after two weeks from that date, which will be 15 April
2007.
Mozilla will drop support for that series from 24
Raúl Porcel kirjoitti:
Hi,
The mozilla team has decided that the
www-client/mozilla-firefox[-bin]-1.5* series will get masked two weeks
from now (18 Mar 2007), that is *1 April 2007*. *And will be removed
after two weeks from that date*, which will be *15 April 2007*.
Shouldn't an
Petteri Räty wrote:
Raúl Porcel kirjoitti:
Hi,
The mozilla team has decided that the
www-client/mozilla-firefox[-bin]-1.5* series will get masked two weeks
from now (18 Mar 2007), that is *1 April 2007*. *And will be removed
after two weeks from that date*, which will be *15 April 2007*.
Andrew Gaffney kirjoitti:
Petteri Räty wrote:
Raúl Porcel kirjoitti:
Hi,
The mozilla team has decided that the
www-client/mozilla-firefox[-bin]-1.5* series will get masked two weeks
from now (18 Mar 2007), that is *1 April 2007*. *And will be removed
after two weeks from that date*, which
On Friday 16 March 2007, Petteri Räty wrote:
Ned Ludd wrote:
Here are the remaining offenders for sync 1174037821 that match
'$(which ' or '`which ' in eclasses and ebuilds.
dev-db/hsqldb/hsqldb-1.7.3.1-r1.ebuild:48:
This one just echos which to a script so it's safe I think.
The
Petteri Räty wrote:
Raúl Porcel kirjoitti:
Hi,
The mozilla team has decided that the
www-client/mozilla-firefox[-bin]-1.5* series will get masked two weeks
from now (18 Mar 2007), that is *1 April 2007*. *And will be removed
after two weeks from that date*, which will be *15 April 2007*.
On 18/03/07, Piotr Jaroszyński [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 18 of March 2007 13:37:55 Jeff Rollin wrote:
Also, if you have a .config directory to put all these files in, ~
becomes less cluttered but ~/.config becomes VERY cluttered!
Nothing prevents from making appdirs in .config too.
Jeff Rollin napsal(a):
On 18/03/07, Piotr Jaroszyński [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 18 of March 2007 13:37:55 Jeff Rollin wrote:
Also, if you have a .config directory to put all these files in, ~
becomes less cluttered but ~/.config becomes VERY cluttered!
Nothing prevents from making
Sorry for sending the mail in HTML :)
It won't happen again.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On 18/03/07, Jakub Moc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeff Rollin napsal(a):
On 18/03/07, Piotr Jaroszyński [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 18 of March 2007 13:37:55 Jeff Rollin wrote:
Also, if you have a .config directory to put all these files in, ~
becomes less cluttered but ~/.config
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 21:46:40 +
Jeff Rollin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which is why I was saying there was no point in a ~/.config
directory...
Generally speaking one lists the contents of one's home directory more
often than one lists ~/.config. It moves the clutter to a place where
it's not
Jeff Rollin napsal(a):
On 18/03/07, Jakub Moc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It wouldn't become any more or less cluttered than ~/ now...
Which is why I was saying there was no point in a ~/.config directory...
I guess you are missing the point? Fire up Midnight Commander and watch
the cruft in
Hi everyone,
as announced some time ago on this list, the text-markup herd has been
split in two different herds: sgml, which will deal with (surprisingly)
sgml and docbook packages, and tex for (La)TeX packages. An arbitrary
decision of herding general text and OCR packages under tex has also
Hi Alexandre,
Good luck in your new life. My only comment is that I think you copped
out by not submitting your proposals for any sort of peer review. You
succumbed to the possibility (that you seem to think is more of a
probability -- you may be right, I don't know) that it would not be
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 17 March 2007, Steve Long wrote:
Piotr Jaroszy?ski wrote:
I have heard about the magic limit of 5, but whatever...
Is there a *technical* objection then to server?
if you're going to change the topic mid-thread, then you should update
Hi Alexandre.
I too would like to hear what your ideas are for the metastructure of
gentoo. Please if you dont feel up to officially submitting them then at
least submit them to this list.
Alistair
On 3/19/07, Seemant Kulleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Alexandre,
Good luck in your new
On Wednesday 14 March 2007, Alexandre Buisse wrote:
The answer to that remark, and it has already been done in today's
discussions, is that we should follow the spirit of the law and not its
letter. But then, why do we need a Code of Conduct at all? There is
nothing in it that people don't
Ryan Hill wrote:
Hey all.
I'd like to add two warnings to the QA GCC warning message reporter for
GCC 4.2.
The first is a new warning that is given when GCC makes an optimization
assuming that overflow for operations on signed ints is undefined, as
per the standard. Apparently a lot of
30 matches
Mail list logo
