Jose Luis Rivero wrote:
> I would suggest this kind of question based on the different ideas shown
> by the developers comunity:
>
> - What is proper way to make changes to ebuild related information
>(metadata.dtd)? Do we need a GLEP? It only need to be discussed in -dev
>first? Gentoo-d
On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 05:45:02AM +, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically
> the 2nd Thursday at 2000 UTC / 1600 EST), same bat channel
> (#gentoo-council @ irc.freenode.net) !
>
> If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, mayb
On 21:04 Sat 01 Dec , Robert Buchholz (rbu) wrote:
> 1.1 media-tv/freevo/freevo-1.7.4.ebuild
>
> file :
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/media-tv/freevo/freevo-1.7.4.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup
> plain:
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/media-
Hi everybody,
Phreak and myself have been working on the data cleanups needed to get
userinfo.xml generation fully automated from LDAP - we're very close
now, just polishing data to that no old data gets used when we go live.
I'm looking for verification/correctness of the following information
(
On 11:48 Sat 01 Dec , Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 17:56 Sat 01 Dec , Mike Frysinger (vapier) wrote:
> > 1.1 net-misc/rsync/rsync-2.6.9-r5.ebuild
> >
> > file :
> > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/net-misc/rsync/rsync-2.6.9-r5.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup
> >
On 17:56 Sat 01 Dec , Mike Frysinger (vapier) wrote:
> 1.1 net-misc/rsync/rsync-2.6.9-r5.ebuild
>
> file :
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/net-misc/rsync/rsync-2.6.9-r5.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup
> plain:
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/ne
On 09:36 Sat 01 Dec , Alin Nastac (mrness) wrote:
> 1.1 app-mobilephone/gammu/gammu-1.15.0.ebuild
>
> file :
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/app-mobilephone/gammu/gammu-1.15.0.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup
> plain:
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> My quote was from the first sentence of RFC1738, sec 3.3 (HTTP), para 4.
Missed that, sorry.
>> Redirecting clients to new URLs would give you perfect caching as well.
> That's why I say i'm willing to do redirection at the cache level.
> I do NOT want lots of users with
This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically
the 2nd Thursday at 2000 UTC / 1600 EST), same bat channel
(#gentoo-council @ irc.freenode.net) !
If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
G
