Re: [gentoo-dev] The app-misc/beagle in portage is seriously outdated!

2008-02-28 Thread Shaochun Wang
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 08:17:56AM +0100, R茅mi Cardona wrote: Create your own overlay and put the ebuild there, maybe try to have it in I really created my own overlay on my personal computer. I also commited a beagle ebuild to gentoo bugzilla. Sunrise, maybe Daniel could proxy-maintain the

Re: [gentoo-dev] The app-misc/beagle in portage is seriously outdated!

2008-02-28 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le jeudi 28 février 2008 à 16:26 +0800, Shaochun Wang a écrit : On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 08:17:56AM +0100, Rémi Cardona wrote: Create your own overlay and put the ebuild there, maybe try to have it in I really created my own overlay on my personal computer. I also commited a beagle ebuild to

Re: [gentoo-dev] The app-misc/beagle in portage is seriously outdated!

2008-02-28 Thread Cédric Krier
On 28/02/08 11:04 +0100, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: Le jeudi 28 février 2008 à 16:26 +0800, Shaochun Wang a écrit : On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 08:17:56AM +0100, Rémi Cardona wrote: Create your own overlay and put the ebuild there, maybe try to have it in I really created my own overlay on

Re: [gentoo-dev] The app-misc/beagle in portage is seriously outdated!

2008-02-28 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 4:00 PM, Alistair Bush [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BTW, besides the beagle bump request in the bugzilla of Gentoo, is there any way to let us normal users get beagle up to date? Im sure that there are more than a few dev that would be willing to proxy maintain

Re: [gentoo-dev] Google SOC 2008

2008-02-28 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 28-02-2008 11:22:13 +, Roy Marples wrote: On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:21:58 +0100, Fabian Groffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not sure how far OpenRC actually can deal with unprivileged installs, so that are just things we have to find out along the way. Provided you have

Re: [gentoo-dev] The app-misc/beagle in portage is seriously outdated!

2008-02-28 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 4:47 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All in all, I take complete blame for this mess. This also means I'm going to fix it :-) -- ~Nirbheek Chauhan -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] New developer: Bo Ørsted Andresen (zlin)

2008-02-28 Thread Petteri Räty
He has been breaking the tree for a while now but as Calchan has been having availability problems I get to insult him a little bit later than usual. Bo hails from Aalborg, Denmark. He studies to become a control engineer. On the Gentoo side he is one of the people who enabled KDE4 coming to

Re: [gentoo-dev] New developer: Bo Ørsted Andres en (zlin)

2008-02-28 Thread Rémi Cardona
Petteri Räty a écrit : He has been breaking the tree for a while now but as Calchan has been having availability problems I get to insult him a little bit later than usual. Bo hails from Aalborg, Denmark. He studies to become a control engineer. On the Gentoo side he is one of the people who

Re: [gentoo-dev] New developer: Bo Ørsted Andresen (zlin)

2008-02-28 Thread Thomas Anderson
On Thursday 28 February 2008 07:28:27 Rémi Cardona wrote: Petteri Räty a écrit : He has been breaking the tree for a while now but as Calchan has been having availability problems I get to insult him a little bit later than usual. Bo hails from Aalborg, Denmark. He studies to become a

Re: [gentoo-dev] The app-misc/beagle in portage is seriously outdated!

2008-02-28 Thread Shaochun Wang
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 04:47:08PM +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: Beagle 0.3.3 itself compiles just fine, but yelp and nautilus don't compile with beagle support (beagle USE flag) because libbeagle got split from Beagle in 0.3, it's API changed, and the version number got bumped. Work is in

Re: [gentoo-dev] New developer: Bo Ørsted Andresen (zlin)

2008-02-28 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le jeudi 28 février 2008 à 07:48 -0500, Thomas Anderson a écrit : [snip] Anyway, Welcome to our crazy team and have fun ! Cheers -- Rémi Cardona LRI, INRIA [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Even more on-topic, Welcome to the Krazy team! ;-) you misspelled it, it's Kr4zy

Re: [gentoo-dev] Google SOC 2008

2008-02-28 Thread Marius Mauch
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 10:32:45 -0800 joshua jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All, Google is once again doing the summer of code for students. I'm helping organize it this year and am putting out a call for some elements to help. 1) We need idea's for things to do. Diego has already

Re: [gentoo-dev] New developer: Bo Ørsted Andresen (zlin)

2008-02-28 Thread Paul Varner
On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 14:28 +0200, Petteri Räty wrote: He has been breaking the tree for a while now but as Calchan has been having availability problems I get to insult him a little bit later than usual. Bo hails from Aalborg, Denmark. He studies to become a control engineer. On the Gentoo

[gentoo-dev] Operations lead --- armin76

2008-02-28 Thread Ferris McCormick
Another attempt. I don't seem to get to gentoo-dev@ Patience, please. === All, It is my pleasure to announce that after some arm twisting, Raúl Porcel (armin76) has accepted the previously open position of sparc Operations Manager. This is no real change since that's what

Re: [gentoo-dev] Keyword request interface (SoC candidate?)

2008-02-28 Thread Torsten Rehn
On Thursday 28 February 2008, Santiago M. Mola wrote: A lot of users don't feel comfortable using Bugzilla and often are lost with our procedures for keyword (both ~ and stable) requests. I think we could use an easy web interface for requesting specific keywords for packages in a

Re: [gentoo-dev] The app-misc/beagle in portage is seriously outdated!

2008-02-28 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 6:19 PM, Shaochun Wang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 04:47:08PM +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: Beagle 0.3.3 itself compiles just fine, but yelp and nautilus don't compile with beagle support (beagle USE flag) because libbeagle got split from

[gentoo-dev] RE: Mesa on i965 (DRI)

2008-02-28 Thread Mateusz Mierzwinski
Ok, I've try i810 and... no DRI. I've reemerge from packege last mesa working with DRI and... no DRI because (EE) AIGLX error: dlsym for __driCreateNewScreen_20050727 failed (/usr/lib64/dri/i965_dri.so: undefined symbol: __driCreateNewScreen_20050727) - library incompatible and need

Re: [gentoo-dev] New developer: Bo Ørsted Andresen (zlin)

2008-02-28 Thread Wulf C. Krueger
On Thursday, 28. February 2008 13:28:11 Petteri Räty wrote: control engineer. On the Gentoo side he is one of the people who enabled KDE4 coming to our main tree via contributing to their overlays. Thanks for that, zlin, and welcome again among our ranks! :-) Now I'm going to mentor the two

Re: [gentoo-dev] Keyword request interface (SoC candidate?)

2008-02-28 Thread Alec Warner
cvs.gentoo.org:/var/cvsroot/gentoo/xml/htdocs/proj/en/userrel/index2008.xml Add it ;) On 2/28/08, Santiago M. Mola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I splitted this from the SoC thread so the possible discussion doesn't add noise to the original thread. On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 7:32 PM, joshua

Re: [gentoo-dev] Keyword request interface (SoC candidate?)

2008-02-28 Thread Santiago M. Mola
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 10:43 PM, Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: cvs.gentoo.org:/var/cvsroot/gentoo/xml/htdocs/proj/en/userrel/index2008.xml Add it ;) I'm not 100% sure this is a good idea, that's why I'm asking for opinions here ;-) Also, I doubt I can mentor. -- Santiago M. Mola

Re: [gentoo-dev] Keyword amd64 - x86_64

2008-02-28 Thread Bernd Steinhauser
Fabian Groffen schrieb: Though, if for instance amd64-fbsd would be introduced, Will that happen? (Asking because I might be interested in testing such a setup.) I think this keyword should have something more generic arch instead, like the x64 we use in prefix now Wouldn't it be more

Re: [gentoo-dev] New developer: Bo Ørsted Andresen (zlin)

2008-02-28 Thread Iain Buchanan
On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 14:28 +0200, Petteri Räty wrote: He has been breaking the tree for a while now but as Calchan has been having availability problems I get to insult him a little bit later than usual. Bo hails from Aalborg, Denmark. He studies to become a control engineer. On the

Re: [gentoo-dev] New developer: Bo Ørsted Andres en (zlin)

2008-02-28 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
Welcome zlin. Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: Le jeudi 28 février 2008 à 07:48 -0500, Thomas Anderson a écrit : [snip] Anyway, Welcome to our crazy team and have fun ! Cheers -- Rémi Cardona LRI, INRIA [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Even more on-topic, Welcome to the Krazy team!

Re: [gentoo-dev] The app-misc/beagle in portage is seriously outdated!

2008-02-28 Thread Shaochun Wang
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 12:13:30AM +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: Yeah, nautilus compiles with the new libbeagle, but silently falls back to manual (non-beagle) search when you try searching from within nautilus. Yes, you are right! Nautilus compiles, but doesn't work as expected. -- Shaochun

Re: [gentoo-dev] Keyword request interface (SoC candidate?)

2008-02-28 Thread Richard Freeman
Santiago M. Mola wrote: I've been talking about it with some users and everyone agrees that they would like to have such an interface... What do you think about? Would it be easy to integrate it with packages.g.o or should it belong somewhere else? Do you think this is a suitable project for

Re: [gentoo-dev] Keyword amd64 - x86_64

2008-02-28 Thread Ben de Groot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bernd Steinhauser wrote: | Though, if for instance amd64-fbsd would be introduced, | Will that happen? (Asking because I might be interested in testing such | a setup.) I would be interested as well, especially if based on FreeBSD-7. | Wouldn't it

Re: [gentoo-dev] Keyword amd64 - x86_64

2008-02-28 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 29-02-2008 08:12:34 +0100, Ben de Groot wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bernd Steinhauser wrote: | Though, if for instance amd64-fbsd would be introduced, | Will that happen? (Asking because I might be interested in testing such | a setup.) I would be interested

[gentoo-portage-dev]

2008-02-28 Thread Tony
Hi, I am new, but I think I found a problem in thr portage tree, dealing with texlive and tetex. I have a personal overlay, where I changed the dependency in the ebuild from dev-text/tetex to virtual/latex-base. This solved it for the package. I think that the packages will have to transition,