Samuli Suominen a écrit :
description: Support for MP4 container format
[+ C ] mp4 (media-sound/amarok):
Build the TagLib plugin for writing tags in Mp4 container files (m4a).
Please note that by enabling this USE flag, the resulting package will
not be redistributable, as it links to
2009/8/21 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfre...@gentoo.org:
Portage documentation has been properly fixed (and the fix will be released
in next version) and this feature can now be used in 10.0 profiles.
No. Changing the documentation does not retroactively change existing EAPIs.
Rémi Cardona wrote:
Samuli Suominen a écrit :
description: Support for MP4 container format
[+ C ] mp4 (media-sound/amarok):
Build the TagLib plugin for writing tags in Mp4 container files (m4a).
Please note that by enabling this USE flag, the resulting package will
not be redistributable,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
will...@linux1 ~ $ euse -i zsh-completion
global use flags (searching: zsh-completion)
no matching entries found
local use flags (searching: zsh-completion)
Samuli Suominen posted on Fri, 21 Aug 2009 20:09:10 +0300 as excerpted:
Rémi Cardona wrote:
Samuli Suominen a écrit :
description: Support for MP4 container format
[+ C ] mp4 (media-sound/amarok):
Build the TagLib plugin for writing tags in Mp4 container files (m4a).
Please note that by
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Robin H. Johnsonrobb...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi folks,
I've been doing some more mucking with the Bugzilla code and setup, and
I think I've got most of the issues worked out that previously prevented
it from being fully load balanced.
So, please test at:
In EAPI 3, most commands and functions provided by the package
manager automatically call die if they fail. There's also a
new nonfatal function that can be used to suppress this
behaviour: by prefixing a function/command call with nonfatal,
the automatic die behaviour is suppressed during the
On Friday 21 of August 2009 22:56:41 David Leverton wrote:
Does anyone have any opinions on which of the four options (#1
make die respect nonfatal, #2 make die always die, #3 add a new
die variant that respects nonfatal, #4 make regular die respect
nonfatal, and add a new variant that
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 23:09:33 +0200
Maciej Mrozowski reave...@poczta.fm wrote:
I suggest #5 - drop the idea of 'nonfatal'.
Then how do you plan to handle all the standard utilities that die on
failure in EAPI 3?
--
Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:25:35 +0200
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfre...@gentoo.org wrote:
2009-08-13 07:55:22 Ryan Hill napisał(a):
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 19:46:56 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 20:41:30 +0200
Tomáš Chvátal
On Friday 21 August 2009 21:56:41 David Leverton wrote:
A potential advantage of this over the previous solution is that if
the force option is implemented with an environment variable,
it can be used regardless of EAPI
...except that the previous solution could use an environment variable
2009-08-21 23:17:56 Ryan Hill napisał(a):
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:25:35 +0200
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfre...@gentoo.org wrote:
2009-08-13 07:55:22 Ryan Hill napisał(a):
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 19:46:56 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed,
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 23:42:11 +0200
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfre...@gentoo.org wrote:
How does changing the portage documentation magically add this to
the PMS?
PMS developers are unwilling to fix many bugs in PMS.
This is not a bug in PMS.
PMS accurately reflected the Portage
2009-08-21 22:56:41 David Leverton napisał(a):
In EAPI 3, most commands and functions provided by the package
manager automatically call die if they fail. There's also a
new nonfatal function that can be used to suppress this
behaviour: by prefixing a function/command call with nonfatal,
the
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 00:40:04 +0200
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfre...@gentoo.org wrote:
I would like to also notice that (not yet approved by Council)
definition of nonfatal() in PMS was recently drastically changed
without proper discussion with developers of other package managers.
Hello!
Arrivals
The third peport table on installed packages most-unmasked has just
arrived:
http://smolt.hartwork.org:45678/static/stats/gentoo.html#installed_packages_most_unmasked
Questions
=
Before adding the forth least-installed table, I'd like to take the
chance to ask
On Friday 21 of August 2009 23:12:23 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 23:09:33 +0200
Maciej Mrozowski reave...@poczta.fm wrote:
I suggest #5 - drop the idea of 'nonfatal'.
Then how do you plan to handle all the standard utilities that die on
failure in EAPI 3?
#1 make die
On 08/22/2009 01:55 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
Hello!
Arrivals
The third peport table on installed packages most-unmasked has just
arrived:
http://smolt.hartwork.org:45678/static/stats/gentoo.html#installed_packages_most_unmasked
Is there something special required to use smolt?
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 01:01:48 +0200
Maciej Mrozowski reave...@poczta.fm wrote:
That being said I don't like refraining from return value approach
towards exception handling approach
nonfatal's not an exception handling approach. Think of it as a utility
like 'nice', 'ionice', 'xargs', 'env' or
On Friday 21 of August 2009 23:46:38 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 23:42:11 +0200
PMS accurately reflected the Portage documentation at the time it was
written and at the time it was approved.
Agreed, but I think it was supposed to reflect Portage 'behaviour' at the
time. Of
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Is there something special required to use smolt? I get to a page that
tells me this after I submit my profile:
Error: Critical: New versions of smolt use a public UUID. Yours is:
pub_----
What version/edition of Smolt are you trying
2009-08-22 00:51:14 Ciaran McCreesh napisał(a):
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 00:40:04 +0200
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfre...@gentoo.org wrote:
I would like to also notice that (not yet approved by Council)
definition of nonfatal() in PMS was recently drastically changed
without proper
On Saturday 22 of August 2009 01:06:30 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 01:01:48 +0200
Maciej Mrozowski reave...@poczta.fm wrote:
That being said I don't like refraining from return value approach
towards exception handling approach
nonfatal's not an exception handling
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 01:20:36 +0200
Maciej Mrozowski reave...@poczta.fm wrote:
That being said I don't like refraining from return value
approach towards exception handling approach
nonfatal's not an exception handling approach. Think of it as a
utility like 'nice', 'ionice', 'xargs',
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 01:15:18 +0200
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfre...@gentoo.org wrote:
There was no change to the definition of nonfatal.
There was a change regardless of what you think.
No, you were misreading the original wording (which I quite happy
admit was wide open for
On 08/22/2009 02:11 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Is there something special required to use smolt? I get to a page that
tells me this after I submit my profile:
Error: Critical: New versions of smolt use a public UUID. Yours is:
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 01:39:41 +0200
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfre...@gentoo.org wrote:
There was a change regardless of what you think.
No, you were misreading the original wording
The original wording didn't disallow affecting die(). Not disallowed
things are always
On Saturday 22 August 2009, Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
It's true, but being able to modularize profile may outweights the
need to be strict-with-the-book here - it's a matter of usefulness. I
think it should be decided by those who actually do the work in
profile, whether it's worthy to push this
2009/8/21 Robert Buchholz r...@gentoo.org:
On Saturday 22 August 2009, Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
It's true, but being able to modularize profile may outweights the
need to be strict-with-the-book here - it's a matter of usefulness. I
think it should be decided by those who actually do the work
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 17:29:12 -0700
Chip Parker infowo...@gmail.com wrote:
If this feature, which HAD been documented (in bugzilla and
commitlogs) prior to the first RFC for PMS
As I've already explained to you on bugzilla, this is untrue. You're
confusing user configuration with the tree. PMS
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
What version/edition of Smolt are you trying to commit with?
The only available one: app-admin/smolt-1.2
Smolt 1.2 does not have the Gentoo-specific client code you need, yet.
Please try again with
app-admin/gentoo-smolt-
from my sping overlay.
Sebastian
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 17:29:12 -0700
Chip Parker infowo...@gmail.com wrote:
If you were building a house, and the blueprints had been signed off
on calling for 1 meter high doors, but the builder had built in 2
meter high doors, would you then go back to the builder and require
him to do
Sebastian Pipping wrote:
Commits are done automatically, triggering and pushing is
manual at the moment.
By now a cron-based setup is running syncing the pure-funtoo overlay
(and therefore also its atom and rss feeds) every 24 hours.
Sebastian
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 21:56:41 +0100
David Leverton levert...@googlemail.com wrote:
Does anyone have any opinions on which of the four options (#1
make die respect nonfatal, #2 make die always die, #3 add a new
die variant that respects nonfatal, #4 make regular die respect
nonfatal, and add a
On 08/22/2009 05:39 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
Sebastian Pipping wrote:
Commits are done automatically, triggering and pushing is
manual at the moment.
By now a cron-based setup is running syncing the pure-funtoo overlay
(and therefore also its atom and rss feeds) every 24 hours.
There
On 08/22/2009 05:59 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 08/22/2009 05:39 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
Sebastian Pipping wrote:
Commits are done automatically, triggering and pushing is
manual at the moment.
By now a cron-based setup is running syncing the pure-funtoo overlay
(and therefore also
On 08/22/2009 04:07 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
What version/edition of Smolt are you trying to commit with?
The only available one: app-admin/smolt-1.2
Smolt 1.2 does not have the Gentoo-specific client code you need, yet.
Please try again with
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 08/22/2009 05:59 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 08/22/2009 05:39 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
Sebastian Pipping wrote:
Commits are done automatically, triggering and pushing is
manual at the moment.
By now a cron-based setup is running syncing the pure-funtoo
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
There seems to be a bit of (minimal) duplication between pure-funtoo and
sunrise:
app-office/thinking-rock-bin
dev-tex/mimetex
x11-drivers/xf86-video-nouveau
And since sunrise is the most popular overlay, it might be a good idea
to also omit packages found
Robert Buchholz posted on Sat, 22 Aug 2009 01:44:51 +0200 as excerpted:
I wonder what the value of the PMS specification is if every time an
inconsistency comes up the argument is raised that it should document
portage behavior. EAPI 1, 2 and 3 have been agreed by the council and
PMS is in a
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Uhm, I just discovered that there are conflicts with portage too. That
is not good. After I added pure-funtoo, it messed up my emerge -u world
(stuff like wanting to upgrade to sys-apps/baselayout-2.1.5).
Hopefully fixed
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Done. Seems to work OK. Though there's no info about the scanning of
packages and my profile page only lists hardware.
I cannot find any new entries in the database.
Have you been using
--server=http://smolt.hartwork.org:45678/
on submission? I mentioned that in
Jeremy Olexa wrote:
- Would zero-install packages be more interesting than
almost-zero ones or the other way around?
I don't really understand this question. Does zero-install mean that
they are not installed at all? This isn't really useful, because the
ommition of a package from the
On 08/22/2009 07:06 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Done. Seems to work OK. Though there's no info about the scanning of
packages and my profile page only lists hardware.
I cannot find any new entries in the database.
Have you been using
Ryan Hill wrote:
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 17:29:12 -0700
Chip Parker infowo...@gmail.com wrote:
If you were building a house, and the blueprints had been signed off
on calling for 1 meter high doors, but the builder had built in 2
meter high doors, would you then go back to the builder and
45 matches
Mail list logo
