diffball (the basis of y'alls delta compression for tarball
snapshots, progenitor of tarsync used by emerge-*webrsync, etc).
Thank you Brian for that pkg, its appreciated. My apologies if the rest is a
little less kind.
ps. I would like the packages to be specifically for gentoo, but
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 08:31:32PM +1300, Alistair Bush wrote:
I'm quite happy to consider the corner cases, and will probably include a
vast majority of them. Initially I don't even believe I will have a fully
complete list of all the projects the fit nicely into my criteria. Thats why
On Sunday 28 March 2010 02:03:43 Doug Goldstein wrote:
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Petteri Räty wrote:
See this thread for background:
http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_0673a33fe75961e510872fd2c1044ce
d.xml
I think we should go through all the ssl use flag using packages
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 08:31:32PM +1300, Alistair Bush wrote:
ps. I would like the packages to be specifically for gentoo, but there
are exceptions to this. as an example openrc (and even paludis to a
degree). If you think that there is a package not specifically
targetting gentoo
On 29 March 2010 09:31, Alistair Bush ali_b...@gentoo.org wrote:
ps. I must say that its a little sad that so far there has been much more
effort put into nitpicking than actually populating the list (working towards
the goal).
The problem is that it isn't very clear what exactly the goal is,
René 'Necoro' Neumann wrote:
Am 28.03.2010 10:30, schrieb Luis Francisco Araujo:
himerge
Hey :P - you are a gentoo dev :P
I think probably most of the app-portage category falls in here (as
portage is the only gentoo-specific thing one can develop stuff for):
eix, etc-proposals,
El mar, 23-03-2010 a las 21:40 +, Jeremy Olexa escribió:
I will be moving these to maintainer-needed in a few days. I no longer use
them and have little motivation to fix incoming bugs. Don't bother to ask,
just feel free to change metadata.xml to yourself.
Thanks,
Jeremy
...
On Monday 29 of March 2010 09:30:38 Peter Volkov wrote:
В Вск, 28/03/2010 в 07:47 +0200, Maciej Mrozowski пишет:
No, seriously - given the fact that some of my packages were even
stabilized without contacting me (app-misc/hal-cups-utils,
app-admin/system-config- printer-common)
If you
Respected sir,
i had seen your project ideas and i am interested to wrok on
some of them like wed applications,java integration.i am an
expert advanced programming designer in java with knowledge
of c,c++ and web designing with html,ccc,php and java
script.so how can i proceed with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
currently I am a maintainer for two packages -- and as a non-gentoo-dev
being proxied by guys who are.
Now a disadvantage of this position are the restricted rights in
bugzilla. In case a bug is filed for one of my maintained packages I
have
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:47:07PM +0200, René 'Necoro' Neumann wrote:
1) Have an implicit restriction, i.e. give them full rights (where
full just means: everything they need for handling their bugs), but
make a policy, that they are only allowed to use this for their
packages. In other
abhik,
this is gentoo-dev. please take this to gentoo-soc, instead.
thanks,
sebastian
On 03/29/2010 11:47 PM, René 'Necoro' Neumann wrote:
So I am asking whether there would be a solution to allow people like me
to have full bugzilla rights on packages they are in charge for.
Just gave you editbugs privileges, further instructions will follow per
mail/irc.
--
Regards,
The change is now committed, please test and report any problems. Thanks
--
Theo Chatzimichos (tampakrap)
Gentoo KDE/Qt Teams
blog.tampakrap.gr
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Theo Chatzimichos posted on Tue, 30 Mar 2010 03:35:19 +0300 as excerpted:
The change is now committed, please test and report any problems. Thanks
[x-posted to desktop and devel, announce pruned]
I noticed the news item when I updated my netbook image yesterday. =:^)
FWIW, my workstation uses
15 matches
Mail list logo
