On Saturday 03 April 2010 16:40:20 Ben de Groot wrote:
On 3 April 2010 13:33, Richard Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
I really think that the Gentoo recruitment process needs improvement.
Right now it seems like a LOT of effort is required both to become a
Gentoo dev and to help somebody
René 'Necoro' Neumann posted on Sat, 10 Apr 2010 20:26:18 +0200 as
excerpted:
Both points also apply to the audio captcha, as you have to a)
understand the word and b) from this infer the correct writing. Which
becomes even more difficult as English is a language, where the
Hello folks,
Looking through the Council project page, the policy regarding the inactive
council members doesn't look optimal to me
To ensure that the council stays active, the chosen metastructure model says
that if a council member (or their appointed proxy) fails to show up for two
On Sunday 11 April 2010 16:16:37 Markos Chandras wrote:
Hello folks,
Sorry for the html email. Kmail betrayed me once again
--
Markos Chandras (hwoarang)
Gentoo Linux Developer
Web: http://hwoarang.silverarrow.org
On Sun, 2010-04-11 at 16:16 +0300, Markos Chandras wrote:
So the attendance to council meetings is enough to prove that a member
is active? 0_o
Yes, since council meetings are where the crucial voting happens.
Council members that fail to show up to meetings are not generating the
output we
/me puts on his asbestos underwear
Markos Chandras wrote:
So the attendance to council meetings is enough to prove that a member is
active? 0_o
Yes. Anything else is just too hard to measure, imo. If you notice a
council member acting w/o knowing what the heck is going on, then vote
him down
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 7:16 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hello folks,
Hi Markos. A small detail first. You shouldn't cross post as it makes
things confusing and often results in threads splitting. I have no
problem with that because my email client merges threads but it's not
On 2010.04.11 14:16, Markos Chandras wrote:
Hello folks,
Looking through the Council project page, the policy regarding the
inactive
council members doesn't look optimal to me
To ensure that the council stays active, the chosen metastructure
model says
that if a council member (or
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 04:04:57PM +0200, Matti Bickel wrote:
/me puts on his asbestos underwear
Markos Chandras wrote:
So the attendance to council meetings is enough to prove that a member is
active? 0_o
Yes. Anything else is just too hard to measure, imo. If you notice a
council
Matti Bickel posted on Sun, 11 Apr 2010 16:04:57 +0200 as excerpted:
A council member is inactive when:
1) He is inactive in critical discussions ( such as the whole Phoenix
discussion ) for a certain period of time
Please, no. Or we start to get -council/-dev threads about why a certain
Zeerak Mustafa Waseem wrote:
But isn't it the councils purpose to lead gentoo?
It's my understanding that council gets elected to lead gentoo as a
whole. But in the end the one doing the work gets to decide what's going
on (as long as it's intra-project; the only thing i remember where
council
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11-04-2010 13:16, Markos Chandras wrote:
Hello folks,
Looking through the Council project page, the policy regarding the inactive
council members doesn't look optimal to me
As others have already explained, this is from GLEP39 and it has an
What do you think about creating a new virtual package, icon-theme?
This would for example simplify the dependencies for
www-client/chromium, which currently uses this:
|| (
x11-themes/gnome-icon-theme
x11-themes/tango-icon-theme
x11-themes/xfce4-icon-theme
)
Also, possibly other
On 04/11/2010 10:38 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
What do you think about creating a new virtual package, icon-theme?
This would for example simplify the dependencies for
www-client/chromium, which currently uses this:
What other packages would make use of the virtual?
Regards,
Petteri
Le 11/04/2010 15:16, Markos Chandras a écrit :
How about the participation to the discussions which took place every
day on our mailing lists or in IRC?
I, for one, am actually glad that the council (as such) isn't involved
in every troll fest we have on -dev, and I hope we keep it that way.
On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 00:13:41 +0200
Christian Faulhammer fa...@gentoo.org wrote:
Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org:
I don't think later is valid resolution. If there's a valid bug it
just means it's never looked at again. If the bug is not valid then a
different resolution should be used.
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 04/11/2010 10:38 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
What do you think about creating a new virtual package, icon-theme?
This would for example simplify the dependencies for
www-client/chromium, which currently uses this:
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2010-04-11 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
net-nntp/bnr2 2010-04-06 17:29:22 ssuominen
net-im/naim 2010-04-06 17:31:30 ssuominen
18 matches
Mail list logo
