On Wednesday 07 of July 2010 02:16:13 Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
> On Thursday 03 of June 2010 01:32:09 Nathan Phillip Brink wrote:
> > On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 03:29:01PM +0200, Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 26 of May 2010 19:27:43 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday 26 May 2010 05
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
W dniu 13.07.2010 22:04, Jeremy Olexa pisze:
> global:doc: Adds extra documentation (API, Javadoc, PDFs at
> maintainer's discretion, etc)
I think you missed "API" here. I don't really see the difference
between bunch of html files and one 8Mb pdf file
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 12:43:17 -0700, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
wrote:
> On 7/13/10 12:32 PM, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
>> On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 19:25:51 + (UTC), "Kacper Kowalik (xarthisius)"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> if use doc; then
>>> insinto /usr/share/doc/${PF}
>>> doins doc/*.pdf |
On 07/13/2010 01:32 PM, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 19:25:51 + (UTC), "Kacper Kowalik (xarthisius)"
wrote:
if use doc; then
insinto /usr/share/doc/${PF}
doins doc/*.pdf || die
An open question to all:
Should we be hiding pdf'
On 7/13/10 12:32 PM, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 19:25:51 + (UTC), "Kacper Kowalik (xarthisius)"
> wrote:
>
>> if use doc; then
>> insinto /usr/share/doc/${PF}
>> doins doc/*.pdf || die
>
> An open question to all:
>
> Should we be hiding pdf's b
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 19:25:51 + (UTC), "Kacper Kowalik (xarthisius)"
wrote:
> if use doc; then
> insinto /usr/share/doc/${PF}
> doins doc/*.pdf || die
An open question to all:
Should we be hiding pdf's behind USE=doc?? I've seen it here and there
as of late.
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 13.07.2010, 13:06 -0400 schrieb Richard Freeman:
> I've seen this at work quite a bit. I've also seen an elegant solution
> that works moderately well. The minutes of the meeting are taken in
> realtime during the meeting by whoever will take it, and this is shared
> with
Wonderful, thank you.
Robert
Am 12.07.2010 um 02:04 schrieb "Robin H. Johnson" :
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 01:30:08AM -0400, Jacob Godserv wrote:
I've had my own uneducated ideas about this exact topic. I'd love to
hear more about this. Will notes or a recording be posted anywhere?
I'm uncert
On 07/12/2010 10:18 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
Rationale: Meeting summary for 20091012 is "to be completed". Meeting
summary for 20100419 is also "to be completed", and all following
council meetings lack summaries. This makes it hard to follow the
council's work.
I've seen this at work qui
