On Sun, 06 Mar 2011 13:22:09 +0100
Christian Ruppert id...@gentoo.org wrote:
NEW will become CONFIRMED
REOPENED will become CONFIRMED (and the REOPENED status will
be removed)
I'd say, both to UNCONFIRMED. Before, we used to set 'NEW' for newly-
added bugs and didn't use UNCONFIRMED
On Sun, 6 Mar 2011 17:34:29 +0100
Constanze Hausner consta...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 17:44 Sat 05 Mar , Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
* some filesystems don't support xattrs at all, and the package
manager needs to support installing to them, even if the user is
building on a filesystem that
On Sun, 06 Mar 2011 23:55:31 +0100
Christian Ruppert id...@gentoo.org wrote:
SSL is enabled by default now, so it's forced. Unfortunately the
option to force SSL *only* for logged in user is no longer available
in Bugzilla-4.x. It has been added in early 3.x AFAIR and later
replaced by
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 10:12, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Is there any *real* reason to force SSL? It is *hell* slow.
Do you mean that SSL is slow or that bugs is slow? I also noticed that
Bugzilla is very slow right now, but it seems unlikely that it's due
to SSL.
Cheers,
Dirkjan
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 4:12 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Sun, 06 Mar 2011 23:55:31 +0100 Christian Ruppert wrote:
SSL is enabled by default now, so it's forced. Unfortunately the
option to force SSL *only* for logged in user is no longer available
in Bugzilla-4.x. It has been added in early 3.x
On Mon, 7 Mar 2011 10:24:33 +0100
Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 10:12, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Is there any *real* reason to force SSL? It is *hell* slow.
Do you mean that SSL is slow or that bugs is slow? I also noticed that
Bugzilla is very
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 10:12:14AM +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
On Sun, 06 Mar 2011 23:55:31 +0100
Christian Ruppert id...@gentoo.org wrote:
SSL is enabled by default now, so it's forced. Unfortunately the
option to force SSL *only* for logged in user is no longer available
in Bugzilla-4.x.
# Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org (26 Jan 2011)
# It makes gnome-panel-2.32 to crash, since upstream looks dead
# any help on fixing bug 348123 is highly appreciated.
# Will be removed around 2011-04-07.
gnome-extra/quick-lounge-applet
_
Was masked since 26 Jan but upstream is still
On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 11:55:31PM +0100, Christian Ruppert wrote:
our Bugzilla (bugs.gentoo.org) will be unavailable for the next hours.
We're going to migrate our old Bugzilla to Bugzilla-4.
We expect our update to finish within the next hours.
All completed now. If you run into any problems,
On 07/03/11 10:51, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
The Gentoo for the Bugzilla service went perfectly, a huge thanks to
idl0r for the years of work he has put into them.
Thanks for all your work on this.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 08:24:46AM +0100, Paweee Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
On 3/6/11 1:50 PM, Brian Harring wrote:
NEW will become CONFIRMED
This seems mildly insane; sure you didn't mean UNCONFIRMED?
I don't understand that concern. There is UNCONFIRMED and NEW, now you'd
get UNCONFIRMED
i plan on punting these (hardly used) functions from the
multilib.eclass (once the handful of open bugs are closed):
get_ml_incdir
prep_ml_includes
create_ml_includes
create_ml_includes-absolute
create_ml_includes-tidy_path
create_ml_includes-listdirs
create_ml_includes-makedestdirs
Michał Górny posted on Mon, 07 Mar 2011 09:34:55 +0100 as excerpted:
I'd say, both to UNCONFIRMED. Before, we used to set 'NEW' for newly-
added bugs and didn't use UNCONFIRMED often. Right now, it seems logical
to use UNCONFIRMED for the new bugs and let devs (re-)confirm them as
necessary.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07-03-2011 08:51, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 11:55:31PM +0100, Christian Ruppert wrote:
our Bugzilla (bugs.gentoo.org) will be unavailable for the next hours.
We're going to migrate our old Bugzilla to Bugzilla-4.
We expect
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 09:44:47AM +0100, Michaaa GGGrny wrote:
On Sun, 6 Mar 2011 17:34:29 +0100
Constanze Hausner consta...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 17:44 Sat 05 Mar , Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
* some filesystems don't support xattrs at all, and the package
manager needs to support
Am Sun, 27 Feb 2011 15:44:13 +0100
schrieb Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org:
As the package seems rather unmaintained, I'm going to wait for a
while and check in the ebuild if nobody is against that.
Any feedback is welcome, please let me know what you think.
I have a printer using
On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 11:55:31PM +0100, Christian Ruppert wrote:
Dear community,
our Bugzilla (bugs.gentoo.org) will be unavailable for the next hours.
We're going to migrate our old Bugzilla to Bugzilla-4.
We expect our update to finish within the next hours.
Some notes:
SSL is
On Mon, 7 Mar 2011 03:40:23 -0800
Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 09:44:47AM +0100, Michaaa GGGrny wrote:
This should help with all the issues mentioned, including binpkg
support. Moreover, user could use the tool manually to restore/reset
filecaps if they
On 09:51 Mon 07 Mar , Robin H. Johnson wrote:
The Gentoo for the Bugzilla service went perfectly, a huge thanks to
idl0r for the years of work he has put into them.
Thanks! One thing I've been very interested about in 3.x and 4.x is API
access that's better than screen-scraping. I tried
Hi!
On Mon, 07 Mar 2011, Mike Frysinger wrote:
If *anybody* can't use SSL for any reason please yell so that we can
decide if we leave it as it is (plain + encrypted) or not.
Is there any *real* reason to force SSL? It is *hell* slow.
it should of course be force for logging in
If it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/07/2011 09:48 AM, Tobias Klausmann wrote:
Hi!
On Mon, 07 Mar 2011, Mike Frysinger wrote:
If *anybody* can't use SSL for any reason please yell so that we can
decide if we leave it as it is (plain + encrypted) or not.
Is there any *real*
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Tobias Klausmann wrote:
On Mon, 07 Mar 2011, Mike Frysinger wrote:
If *anybody* can't use SSL for any reason please yell so that we can
decide if we leave it as it is (plain + encrypted) or not.
Is there any *real* reason to force SSL? It is *hell* slow.
On 16:35 Mon 07 Mar , Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 15:13, Donnie Berkholz dberkh...@gentoo.org wrote:
Thanks! One thing I've been very interested about in 3.x and 4.x is API
access that's better than screen-scraping. I tried using the
python-bugzilla client that
# Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org (07 Mar 2011)
# No longer needed package wrt #330397. Removal in 30 days.
media-libs/glitz
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
# Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org (07 Mar 2011)
# No longer needed package wrt #330397. Removal in 30 days.
media-libs/glitz
And there was much celebration amongst the populi!
--
~Nirbheek Chauhan
Gentoo
Am 07.03.2011 11:24, schrieb Mike Frysinger:
i plan on punting these (hardly used) functions from the
multilib.eclass (once the handful of open bugs are closed):
get_ml_incdir
prep_ml_includes
create_ml_includes
create_ml_includes-absolute
create_ml_includes-tidy_path
On Mon, 7 Mar 2011 15:48:19 +0100
Tobias Klausmann klaus...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 07 Mar 2011, Mike Frysinger wrote:
If *anybody* can't use SSL for any reason please yell so that we
can decide if we leave it as it is (plain + encrypted) or not.
Is there any *real* reason to force
On 03/07/2011 08:47 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Mon, 7 Mar 2011 15:48:19 +0100
Tobias Klausmann klaus...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 07 Mar 2011, Mike Frysinger wrote:
If *anybody* can't use SSL for any reason please yell so that we
can decide if we leave it as it is (plain + encrypted) or
On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 20:47 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
On Mon, 7 Mar 2011 15:48:19 +0100
Tobias Klausmann klaus...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 07 Mar 2011, Mike Frysinger wrote:
If *anybody* can't use SSL for any reason please yell so that we
can decide if we leave it as it is (plain +
On 07-03-2011 15:06:25 -0500, Olivier Crête wrote:
Maybe it's not to protect the user, but to protect the Gentoo
infrastructure.. And really, SSL has been supported by every browser for
the last 15 years. And it is not in any way slow or slower than non-SSL.
but the certificate security
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 4:32 PM, Fabian Groffen grob...@gentoo.org wrote:
As outsider, I don't like to accept another certificate thing, just to
view a bugtracker.
When you think about it, this is a defect with your browser, and not
so much with SSL itself.
Your browser generally doesn't
On 07-03-2011 16:52:23 -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
In any case, I don't see poor browser design as a valid reason for
avoiding the use of SSL...
Please use a MUA that properly honours Reply-To: headers. I'm on the
list.
--
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo on a different level
On Monday, March 07, 2011 16:59:22 Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 07-03-2011 16:52:23 -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
In any case, I don't see poor browser design as a valid reason for
avoiding the use of SSL...
Please use a MUA that properly honours Reply-To: headers. I'm on the
list.
subscribed
On Monday, March 07, 2011 16:32:55 Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 07-03-2011 15:06:25 -0500, Olivier Crête wrote:
Maybe it's not to protect the user, but to protect the Gentoo
infrastructure.. And really, SSL has been supported by every browser for
the last 15 years. And it is not in any way slow
On Monday, March 07, 2011 12:35:53 Thomas Sachau wrote:
Am 07.03.2011 11:24, schrieb Mike Frysinger:
also, i'll be converting the glibc ebuilds do always invoke the
multilib_env helper functions. this will allow us to drop the
{C,LD}FLAGS_xxx and friends from profiles since glibc was the
On Sun, 6 Mar 2011 14:17:37 +0100
Christian Faulhammer fa...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi,
Christian Ruppert id...@gentoo.org:
We're almost done with the preparation of bugzilla-4.x for
bugs.gentoo.org. So, do we want the new workflow or do we want to
keep the old?
New one, reopened is a
On Sun, 6 Mar 2011 17:37:27 +0100
Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org wrote:
One thing I noticed is that by default, search now also searches
content, instead of just the titles. I rather liked the old
behavior.
Yes, and it gets weirder when you search for a term that matches a
package name as
On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 08:13 -0600, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Thanks! One thing I've been very interested about in 3.x and 4.x is API
access that's better than screen-scraping. I tried using the
python-bugzilla client that accesses Bugzilla via XML-RPC but it didn't
seem to work. Do we have
38 matches
Mail list logo
