On 12/02/13 08:21, Ian Whyman wrote:
Guys,
Can we not just have a developer wide vote or something? This
instance clearly not going to resole itself.
It is a little bikeshed. Originally the virtual was ordered in a
way, then ordered in another and now we are discussing which one is
better
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:21 AM, Ian Whyman thev00...@gentoo.org wrote:
Can we not just have a developer wide vote or something? This instance
clearly not going to resole itself.
I don't think the average developer is really in a good position to
resolve this - it will just create a whole lot
On 12 February 2013 12:45, Ian Delaney (idella4) idel...@gentoo.org wrote:
idella4 13/02/12 12:45:55
Modified: package.mask
Log:
xen-tools-4.2.1-r2.ebuild masked due to need for further refinement, adding
to virtualizarion overlay
Revision ChangesPath
1.14465
On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 12:16:22 +0100
Luca Barbato lu_z...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 12/02/13 08:21, Ian Whyman wrote:
Guys,
Can we not just have a developer wide vote or something? This
instance clearly not going to resole itself.
It is a little bikeshed. Originally the virtual was ordered
On 2/11/13 11:14 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
My patches introduce a single wrapper with argv-as-parameter syntax.
That is, the fore-mentioned example would look like:
virtualx run_tests --foo
Maybe we can just adapt Ubuntu's (I think) xvfb-run? More
standardization == profit.
Thank you
On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 20:43:02 +0100
Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Fabio Erculiani lx...@gentoo.org
wrote:
+1 from me; I've had a few machines break on kernel upgrades
because I didn't have the proper firmware installed (I guess older
kernel sources
On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 14:49:03 -0800
Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote:
Most external firmware is not needed to boot. If you need it to boot,
you will have to stow it in the initramfs.
For those of us who prefer monolithic kernels, virtually all firmware
is needed to boot. Even if a network
I am starting to believe that this is yet another good reason for
having official ebuilds building binaries off gentoo-sources through
genkernel. Pretty much the same I do in Sabayon since 2007.
--
Fabio Erculiani
El mar, 12-02-2013 a las 19:43 +, Fabio Erculiani escribió:
I am starting to believe that this is yet another good reason for
having official ebuilds building binaries off gentoo-sources through
genkernel. Pretty much the same I do in Sabayon since 2007.
I think shouldn't have any
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 7:47 PM, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
El mar, 12-02-2013 a las 19:43 +, Fabio Erculiani escribió:
I am starting to believe that this is yet another good reason for
having official ebuilds building binaries off gentoo-sources through
genkernel. Pretty much the
Christopher Head posted on Tue, 12 Feb 2013 11:39:57 -0800 as excerpted:
On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 14:49:03 -0800 Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org
wrote:
Most external firmware is not needed to boot. If you need it to boot,
you will have to stow it in the initramfs.
For those of us who prefer
Christopher Head posted on Tue, 12 Feb 2013 11:38:14 -0800 as excerpted:
On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 20:43:02 +0100 Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org
wrote:
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Fabio Erculiani lx...@gentoo.org
wrote:
+1 from me; I've had a few machines break on kernel upgrades because
On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 20:51:15 + (UTC)
Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
Christopher Head posted on Tue, 12 Feb 2013 11:38:14 -0800 as
excerpted:
On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 20:43:02 +0100 Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org
wrote:
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Fabio Erculiani
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 02/12/2013 10:14 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
as preparation for the up-coming cvs-git migration of the portage
tree, the council is strongly suggesting that from this point
forward all developers sign their manifests with their gpg key as
On 02/12/2013 09:43 PM, Duncan wrote:
Christopher Head posted on Tue, 12 Feb 2013 11:39:57 -0800 as excerpted:
On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 14:49:03 -0800 Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org
wrote:
Most external firmware is not needed to boot. If you need it to boot,
you will have to stow it in the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 02/12/2013 10:14 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
If you have any questions on this, please feel free to let us
know.
What is the rotation strategy for (near) outdated keys?
Alter the key or create a new one? Sign the new with the old one?
IMHO the
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 12:12:35AM +0100, Michael Weber wrote:
On 02/12/2013 10:14 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
If you have any questions on this, please feel free to let us
know.
What is the rotation strategy for (near) outdated keys?
Alter the key or create a new one? Sign the new with the
On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 15:14:15 -0600
William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
All,
as preparation for the up-coming cvs-git migration of the portage
tree, the council is strongly suggesting that from this point forward
all developers sign their manifests with their gpg key as described
in
On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 01:47:34 +0100
Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote:
It would help if repoman noticed when you have FEATURES=-sign. :-\
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=457034
jer
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 01:47:34 +0100
Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote:
It would help if repoman noticed when you have FEATURES=-sign. :-\
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=457034
We can do the opposite, and just
On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 17:07:33 -0800
Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org
wrote:
On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 01:47:34 +0100
Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote:
It would help if repoman noticed when you have FEATURES=-sign. :-\
On 02/13/2013 12:28 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 12:12:35AM +0100, Michael Weber wrote:
On 02/12/2013 10:14 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
If you have any questions on this, please feel free to let us
know.
What is the rotation strategy for (near) outdated keys?
Alter the
22 matches
Mail list logo
