Re: [gentoo-dev] Idea for a new project: gentoo-libs

On 05/08/18 18:24, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Sun, Aug 5, 2018 at 1:01 PM Alec Warner wrote: >> >> Part of my frustration is that seemingly "anything open source related >> can be held in Gentoo" and I'm somewhat against that as I feel it >> dilutes the Gentoo mission. We are here to make a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Idea for a new project: gentoo-libs

On Sun, Aug 5, 2018 at 2:12 PM Richard Yao wrote: > > > Prestige is good. We have prestige from our (myself and a few others) work in > upstream ZFS and Gentoo is well respected there. Sure, but ZFS on Linux isn't a Gentoo project. I'm not saying people who are Gentoo devs can't also do other

Re: [gentoo-dev] Idea for a new project: gentoo-libs

> On Jun 23, 2018, at 9:05 AM, Jonas Stein wrote: > >> On 2018-06-23 04:57, Marty E. Plummer wrote: >>> On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 09:50:50PM -0500, Marty E. Plummer wrote: >>> So, as you may be aware I've been doing some work on moving bzip2 to an >>> autotools based build. Recently I've ran

Re: [gentoo-dev] Idea for a new project: gentoo-libs

On 05/08/18 18:01, Alec Warner wrote [excerpted]: > > > On Sun, Aug 5, 2018 at 12:45 PM, Richard Yao > wrote: > > > > On Jun 23, 2018, at 6:59 AM, Alec Warner > wrote: > >> >> I suspect this might be better done in the Linux

Re: [gentoo-dev] Idea for a new project: gentoo-libs

On Sun, Aug 5, 2018 at 1:01 PM Alec Warner wrote: > > > Part of my frustration is that seemingly "anything open source related > can be held in Gentoo" and I'm somewhat against that as I feel it > dilutes the Gentoo mission. We are here to make a distribution, not > maintain random libraries. If

Re: [gentoo-dev] Idea for a new project: gentoo-libs

> On Jun 23, 2018, at 6:59 AM, Alec Warner wrote: > > > >> On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 3:30 AM, Marty E. Plummer >> wrote: >> On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 09:22:00AM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: >> > W dniu pią, 22.06.2018 o godzinie 21∶50 -0500, użytkownik Marty E. >> > Plummer napisał: >> > > So,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Idea for a new project: gentoo-libs

On Sun, Aug 5, 2018 at 12:45 PM, Richard Yao wrote: > > > On Jun 23, 2018, at 6:59 AM, Alec Warner wrote: > > > > On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 3:30 AM, Marty E. Plummer > wrote: > >> On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 09:22:00AM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: >> > W dniu pią, 22.06.2018 o godzinie 21∶50 -0500,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Idea for a new project: gentoo-libs

> On Aug 5, 2018, at 1:01 PM, Alec Warner wrote: > > > >> On Sun, Aug 5, 2018 at 12:45 PM, Richard Yao wrote: >> >> >>> On Jun 23, 2018, at 6:59 AM, Alec Warner wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 3:30 AM, Marty E. Plummer wrote: On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at

Re: [gentoo-dev] Idea for a new project: gentoo-libs

> On Aug 5, 2018, at 1:24 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > >> On Sun, Aug 5, 2018 at 1:01 PM Alec Warner wrote: >> >> >> Part of my frustration is that seemingly "anything open source related >> can be held in Gentoo" and I'm somewhat against that as I feel it >> dilutes the Gentoo mission. We

Re: [gentoo-dev] Idea for a new project: gentoo-libs

> On Aug 5, 2018, at 2:35 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > >> On Sun, Aug 5, 2018 at 2:12 PM Richard Yao wrote: >> >> >> Prestige is good. We have prestige from our (myself and a few others) work >> in upstream ZFS and Gentoo is well respected there. > > Sure, but ZFS on Linux isn't a Gentoo

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 2/2 v2] Update /usr/portage references (bug 378603)

Update all relevant references in docs, messages, and comments to refer to /var/db/repos/gentoo instead of /usr/portage. Also update DISTDIR and PKGDIR references to refer to the new /var/cache/{distfiles,binpkgs} locations. Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/378603 --- [PATCH 2/2 v2] fixes DISTDIR and

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 0/2] Change /usr/portage council approved locations (bug 378603)

This includes a _compat_upgrade.default_locations script that the ebuild can call in pkg_preinst in order to maintain backward-compatible defaults when appropriate. The new defaults are specified in the summary of the 20180729 council meeting: Vote: Default locations for the Gentoo repository,

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 1/2] Change /usr/portage council approved locations (bug 378603)

This includes a _compat_upgrade.default_locations script that the ebuild can call in pkg_preinst in order to maintain backward-compatible defaults when appropriate. The new defaults are specified in the summary of the 20180729 council meeting: Vote: Default locations for the Gentoo repository,

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 2/2] Update /usr/portage references (bug 378603)

Update all relevant references in docs, messages, and comments to refer to /var/db/repos/gentoo instead of /usr/portage. Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/378603 --- cnf/make.conf.example| 12 +-- lib/portage/__init__.py | 2 +-

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 2/2] Update /usr/portage references (bug 378603)

> On Sun, 5 Aug 2018, Zac Medico wrote: > --- a/cnf/make.conf.example > +++ b/cnf/make.conf.example > [...] > @@ -119,16 +119,16 @@ > # fetched on demand for a given build. If you would like to > # selectively prune obsolete files from this directory, see > # eclean from the

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2018-08-05 23:59 UTC

/precis-i18n 20180731-23:00 aidecoe eb3ddb110e1 dev-python/pytest-describe 20180804-20:20 whissi1af688711db dev-python/python-cstruct 20180731-22:46 zmedico ad00fcb37f0 dev-python/serverfiles 20180805-16:18 amynkadf9c050629b media-libs/graphene

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 2/2] Update /usr/portage references (bug 378603)

On 08/05/2018 09:59 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> On Sun, 5 Aug 2018, Zac Medico wrote: > >> --- a/cnf/make.conf.example >> +++ b/cnf/make.conf.example >> [...] > >> @@ -119,16 +119,16 @@ >> # fetched on demand for a given build. If you would like to >> # selectively prune obsolete