On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 21:09:15 +0200
Jaco Kroon wrote:
> Hi Michał,
>
> On 2020/03/23 18:25, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2020-03-23 at 10:21 +0200, Jaco Kroon wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/713668 relates.
> >>
> >> * Searching for /usr/include/execinfo.h ...
> >> sys-li
On Mon, 2020-03-23 at 14:26 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 08:19:20PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Mon, 2020-03-23 at 13:23 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> > > Hey all,
> > >
> > > it has been brought to my attention that there have been several
> > > backward-incompatibl
Dear all,
The following packages are up for grabs:
app-office/magicpoint
sys-apps/flashrom
after retirement of the proxied maintainer.
https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/app-office/magicpoint
https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/sys-apps/flashrom
There are open bugs.
Some with patches: https:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 08:19:20PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-03-23 at 13:23 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > it has been brought to my attention that there have been several
> > backward-incompatible changes made to the python eclasses lately.
>
> Does 'several' in
On Mon, 2020-03-23 at 14:00 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 07:36:13PM +0100, David Seifert wrote:
> > On Mon, 2020-03-23 at 13:23 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> > > Hey all,
> > >
> > > it has been brought to my attention that there have been several
> > > backward-incompatib
On Mon, 2020-03-23 at 13:23 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> it has been brought to my attention that there have been several
> backward-incompatible changes made to the python eclasses lately.
Does 'several' in this case mean more than one? Please correct me if
I'm mistaken but the on
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 02:14:06PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 08:03:47PM +0100, David Seifert wrote:
> > On Mon, 2020-03-23 at 14:00 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 07:36:13PM +0100, David Seifert wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2020-03-23 at 13:23 -0500,
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 08:03:47PM +0100, David Seifert wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-03-23 at 14:00 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 07:36:13PM +0100, David Seifert wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2020-03-23 at 13:23 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> > > > Hey all,
> > > >
> > > > it has been bro
Hi Michał,
On 2020/03/23 18:25, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-03-23 at 10:21 +0200, Jaco Kroon wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/713668 relates.
>>
>> * Searching for /usr/include/execinfo.h ...
>> sys-libs/glibc-2.29-r7 (/usr/include/execinfo.h)
>>
>> As I see I can either add an
On Mon, 2020-03-23 at 14:00 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 07:36:13PM +0100, David Seifert wrote:
> > On Mon, 2020-03-23 at 13:23 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> > > Hey all,
> > >
> > > it has been brought to my attention that there have been several
> > > backward-incompatib
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 07:36:13PM +0100, David Seifert wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-03-23 at 13:23 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > it has been brought to my attention that there have been several
> > backward-incompatible changes made to the python eclasses lately.
> >
> > It is true t
On 3/23/20 2:27 PM, Joonas Niilola wrote:
> On 3/23/20 8:23 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
>> but we need to
>> find a way to notify them when a breaking change is going into a widely
>> used eclass and give them time to adjust their ebuilds.
>>
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
> Subscribe to this mailing list.
>
> A
[2020-03-23 20:27:51+0200] Joonas Niilola:
> On 3/23/20 8:23 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> > but we need to
> > find a way to notify them when a breaking change is going into a widely
> > used eclass and give them time to adjust their ebuilds.
> >
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> Subscribe to this mailing list
On Mon, 2020-03-23 at 13:23 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> it has been brought to my attention that there have been several
> backward-incompatible changes made to the python eclasses lately.
>
> It is true that everything in ::gentoo has been fixed along with the
> changes to the ecl
On 3/23/20 8:23 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> but we need to
> find a way to notify them when a breaking change is going into a widely
> used eclass and give them time to adjust their ebuilds.
>
>
> Thoughts?
>
Subscribe to this mailing list.
AFAIK all major changes have been posted here and pushed
Hey all,
it has been brought to my attention that there have been several
backward-incompatible changes made to the python eclasses lately.
It is true that everything in ::gentoo has been fixed along with the
changes to the eclasses; however, when a change like this goes into a
widely used eclass
On Mon, 2020-03-23 at 10:21 +0200, Jaco Kroon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/713668 relates.
>
> * Searching for /usr/include/execinfo.h ...
> sys-libs/glibc-2.29-r7 (/usr/include/execinfo.h)
>
> As I see I can either add an explicit depend on glibc which I'd prefer
> not to. Or some
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 7:29 AM malc wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 9:13 AM Jaco Kroon wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Is there a known issue with dev.gentoo.org?
>
> https://infra-status.gentoo.org/ agrees with your analysis... (at
> 10:50 UTC) I would keep checking there as infra wakes up and
On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 00:13:46 +0100
Andreas Sturmlechner wrote:
> # Andreas Sturmlechner (2020-03-22)
> # Unmaintained revdep on dev-python/pygtk blocking its removal, py2-only
> # Bug #710172, masked for removal in 30 days.
> media-video/gtk-recordmydesktop
You may want to suggest media-video/s
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 9:13 AM Jaco Kroon wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Is there a known issue with dev.gentoo.org?
https://infra-status.gentoo.org/ agrees with your analysis... (at
10:50 UTC) I would keep checking there as infra wakes up and updates
the status.
Hi All,
Is there a known issue with dev.gentoo.org?
I initially thought it might just be a routing issue from our network
but have since confirmed at least two other sources with the same
problem. One of these are IPv4 only, the other two are trying IPv6
too. All failing.
One v6 and v4:
1?:
Hi,
https://bugs.gentoo.org/713668 relates.
* Searching for /usr/include/execinfo.h ...
sys-libs/glibc-2.29-r7 (/usr/include/execinfo.h)
As I see I can either add an explicit depend on glibc which I'd prefer
not to. Or someone from the musl team could possibly assist on how to
get the backtrac
22 matches
Mail list logo
