On Tue, Jun 16, 2020, at 3:57 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-06-16 at 15:19 -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 1:55 PM Zac Medico wrote:
> > > On 6/16/20 10:46 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 1:45 PM Mike Gilbert wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Jun
On 6/16/20 7:47 PM, Michael Lienhardt wrote:
>
>
> On 6/16/20 11:59 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
>> On 6/16/20 6:38 PM, Michael Lienhardt wrote:
>>> With the first version of DEPEND, emerge succeed:
>>> # emerge -pv app-misc/dummy-master
>>>
>>> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
On 6/16/20 11:59 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 6/16/20 6:38 PM, Michael Lienhardt wrote:
>> With the first version of DEPEND, emerge succeed:
>> # emerge -pv app-misc/dummy-master
>>
>> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
>>
>> Calculating dependencies... done!
>> [ebuild N
On 6/16/20 6:38 PM, Michael Lienhardt wrote:
>
>
> On 6/16/20 9:31 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
>> On 6/16/20 11:07 PM, Michael Lienhardt wrote:
>>> I'm sorry, my client didn't allow to send plain text email anymore...
>>>
>>> So, here is my original email.
>>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> My bad for not
On 6/16/20 9:31 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 6/16/20 11:07 PM, Michael Lienhardt wrote:
>> I'm sorry, my client didn't allow to send plain text email anymore...
>>
>> So, here is my original email.
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> My bad for not noticing it sooner, but when there is a dependency like
>>
Dear
all,
My bad for not noticing it sooner, but when there is a dependency like
"=sys-fs/udev-208-r1:0/0[static-libs?]" (that occurs in
virtual/libgudev-215-r3), since 'static-libs' is not a use flags of
sys-fs/udev-242, it is silently not considered during dependency solving by
emerge.
On 6/16/20 11:43 AM, michael.lienhardt wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> My bad for not noticing it sooner, but when there is a dependency like
> ">=sys-fs/udev-208-r1:0/0[static-libs?]" (that occurs in
> virtual/libgudev-215-r3), since 'static-libs' is not a use flags of
> sys-fs/udev-242, it is silently
I'm sorry, my client didn't allow to send plain text email anymore...
So, here is my original email.
Dear all,
My bad for not noticing it sooner, but when there is a dependency like
">=sys-fs/udev-208-r1:0/0[static-libs?]" (that occurs in
virtual/libgudev-215-r3),
since 'static-libs' is not
On Tue, 2020-06-16 at 15:19 -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 1:55 PM Zac Medico wrote:
> > On 6/16/20 10:46 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 1:45 PM Mike Gilbert wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 9:39 AM Sid Spry wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Jun 15,
On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 20:43:44 +0200 (CEST)
"michael.lienhardt" wrote:
> Dear all,
> My bad for not noticing it sooner, but when there is a dependency
> like "=sys-fs/udev-208-r1:0/0[static-libs?]" (that occurs in
> virtual/libgudev-215-r3), since 'static-libs' is not a use flags of
>
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 1:55 PM Zac Medico wrote:
>
> On 6/16/20 10:46 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 1:45 PM Mike Gilbert wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 9:39 AM Sid Spry wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020, at 2:36 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> But we know
On 6/16/20 10:46 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 1:45 PM Mike Gilbert wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 9:39 AM Sid Spry wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020, at 2:36 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
But we know that it is in /usr/bin, so why add yet another indirection?
On 6/16/20 10:36 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> While investigating bug 489542, it became clear that the netsurf
> eclass is deprecated in spirit if not in fact. All of the newer
> netsurf ebuilds use a custom function loaded from a script that is
> shipped in netsurf-buildsystem's $FILESDIR to do
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 1:45 PM Mike Gilbert wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 9:39 AM Sid Spry wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020, at 2:36 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > > But we know that it is in /usr/bin, so why add yet another indirection?
> > >
> > > Attachments:
> > > * signature.asc
> >
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 9:39 AM Sid Spry wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020, at 2:36 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > But we know that it is in /usr/bin, so why add yet another indirection?
> >
> > Attachments:
> > * signature.asc
>
> Ah, sorry -- I forgot to note this here. If you wish to support
While investigating bug 489542, it became clear that the netsurf
eclass is deprecated in spirit if not in fact. All of the newer
netsurf ebuilds use a custom function loaded from a script that is
shipped in netsurf-buildsystem's $FILESDIR to do (some of) what the
eclass used to do. That function
On 2020-06-14 16:30, a...@freemail.hu wrote:
>
> Suggested fix for: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=489542
> Bug 489542 - netsurf.eclass should not include EROOT in PREFIX
>
Well, I've applied this as well as some other fixes for the eclass, only
to find that the problem has been
17 matches
Mail list logo
