Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-python/ package naming policy?

2023-01-28 Thread Michał Górny
On Sun, 2023-01-29 at 02:15 +0300, Torokhov Sergey wrote: > As for replacing dot  (".") with hyphen ("-") I have PyPi package > "FoBiS.py" that is packaged in ::guru just as "FoBiS" as I wasn't sure > is it worth to store ".py" suffix while github repo of this project is > just "FoBiS". So there

Re: [gentoo-dev] Various packages up for grabs (avahi, curl, fcron, tor...)

2023-01-28 Thread Viorel Munteanu
La 28.01.2023 22:11, Michał Górny a scris: Hi, Per blueness' request, some of his packages are now looking for a new maintainer. The affected packages are: acct-group/at acct-group/avahi acct-group/avahi-autoipd acct-group/axtls acct-group/bitflu acct-group/cron acct-group/fcron

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-ruby/ruby_gntp

2023-01-28 Thread Hans de Graaff
# Hans de Graaff (2023-01-28) # No upstream releases since 2010. No longer maintained # upstream. ruby27-only package. Masked for removal on 2023-02-27. dev-ruby/ruby_gntp signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[gentoo-dev] desktop.eclass: allow 1024 as a size for icons

2023-01-28 Thread Pacho Ramos
Hello, As discussed in https://bugs.gentoo.org/888635 , 1024x1024 icons are starting to be deployed in some apps as they start to be used in MacOSX environment. Some weeks ago I needed to skip their installation for net-im/rocketchat-desktop-bin and I saw that net-analyzer/wireshark is

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: media-libs/ilmbase

2023-01-28 Thread waebbl-gentoo
# Bernd Waibel (2023-01-28) # Possible security issues, obsolete. Use OpenEXR-3 / Imath instead. # No revdeps and consumers left in ::gentoo # Removal in 30 days. Bug #892375 media-libs/ilmbase -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQGTBAEBCgB9FiEExIg3+Emk70nqAQ2ybb4K1Uo7McYFAmJOvDBfFIAALgAo

[gentoo-dev] dev-python/ package naming policy?

2023-01-28 Thread Michał Górny
Hi, everyone. TL;DR: I'd like to propose naming dev-python/* packages following PyPI names whenever possible, case-preserving, with modifications only when necessary to match PN rules. So far the naming in dev-python/* hasn't been exactly consistent. Myself I've been mostly following

Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-python/ package naming policy?

2023-01-28 Thread Ionen Wolkens
On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 05:38:05PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > Hi, everyone. > > TL;DR: I'd like to propose naming dev-python/* packages following PyPI > names whenever possible, case-preserving, with modifications only when > necessary to match PN rules. > > > So far the naming in

Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-python/ package naming policy?

2023-01-28 Thread Anna (cybertailor) Vyalkova
I'd prefer if PyPI names are guidelines, not a strict policy. I don't like CamelCase and separators other than dash ("-") :P Also I don't like when packages are named "dev-python/python-foo" instead of just "dev-python/foo".

Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-python/ package naming policy?

2023-01-28 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Sat, 28 Jan 2023, Michał Górny wrote: > Based on existing remote-id entries, the following package names are > mismatched (PN on left, PyPI name on right). Note that some of the IDs > could be wrong, particularly because PyPI "autocorrects" - vs _. Are there any rules by which upstream

Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-python/ package naming policy?

2023-01-28 Thread Andrew Ammerlaan
On 28/01/2023 19:02, Ulrich Mueller wrote: On Sat, 28 Jan 2023, Michał Górny wrote: However, it's been pointed out that this makes it hard for people to find packages they're looking for. I don't understand this argument. Why would all-lowercase make finding a package harder? Here's an

Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-python/ package naming policy?

2023-01-28 Thread Michał Górny
On Sat, 2023-01-28 at 17:38 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > TL;DR: I'd like to propose naming dev-python/* packages following PyPI > names whenever possible, case-preserving, with modifications only when > necessary to match PN rules. Based on existing remote-id entries, the following package names

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] rocm.eclass: support RDNA3 GPU for >=5.4, remove <5

2023-01-28 Thread Yiyang Wu
ROCm libraries with version <5 are cleaned up, remove version 4 support for rocm.eclass. RDNA3 has initial support in ROCm libraries starting from 5.4 releases. Enable gfx110* amdgpu_targets in rocm.eclass and add corresponding description. Tried =sci-libs/rocBLAS-5.4.2, can compile successfully

Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-python/ package naming policy?

2023-01-28 Thread Anna (cybertailor) Vyalkova
On 2023-01-28 19:02, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > On Sat, 28 Jan 2023, Michał Górny wrote: > >> However, it's been pointed out that this makes it hard for people to > >> find packages they're looking for. > > I don't understand this argument. Why would all-lowercase make finding a > package

Re: [gentoo-dev] Various packages up for grabs (avahi, curl, fcron, tor...)

2023-01-28 Thread Sam James
> On 28 Jan 2023, at 20:11, Michał Górny wrote: > > Hi, > > Per blueness' request, some of his packages are now looking for a new > maintainer. The affected packages are: > > > dev-util/gperf > net-misc/curl > sys-fs/f2fs-tools > sys-process/cronbase > virtual/cron Taken for base-system@.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Various packages up for grabs (avahi, curl, fcron, tor...)

2023-01-28 Thread Sam James
> On 28 Jan 2023, at 20:24, Michał Górny wrote: > > On Sat, 2023-01-28 at 21:18 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: >> On Sat, 2023-01-28 at 21:11 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Per blueness' request, some of his packages are now looking for a new >>> maintainer. The affected packages

Re: [gentoo-dev] Various packages up for grabs (avahi, curl, fcron, tor...)

2023-01-28 Thread Zoltan Puskas
Hi, I'll take the following as proxy-maintainer (for now): acct-user/at acct-group/at sys-process/at sys-fs/encfs Related PRs: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/29325 https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/29326 Cheers, Zoltan

Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-python/ package naming policy?

2023-01-28 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Sat, 28 Jan 2023, Andrew Ammerlaan wrote: > Each of these is a different package. The package you usually want is > GitPython, but if we would name it gitpython or git-python, things > would get very confusing very quickly. In fact, this package was > renamed precisely to avoid this

Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-python/ package naming policy?

2023-01-28 Thread Torokhov Sergey
The similar names in PyPi is a real problem for users when trying to find associated packages. It's also could be a security issue for them with malicious packages named like popular packages. So in ::guru I try to save package naming even if it's too  CamelCase.As for replacing dot  (".") with

Re: [gentoo-dev] Various packages up for grabs (avahi, curl, fcron, tor...)

2023-01-28 Thread Michał Górny
On Sat, 2023-01-28 at 21:11 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > Hi, > > Per blueness' request, some of his packages are now looking for a new > maintainer. The affected packages are: > Also packages that were left without a proxy: dev-libs/libbase58 net-misc/bfgminer -- Best regards, Michał Górny

[gentoo-dev] Re: Last rites: app-admin/gkrellm & plugins

2023-01-28 Thread Philip Webb
[ This has been posted on Gentoo User, but in case it hasn't been seen by discussants at Gentoo Dev, here it is. It seems clear upstream isn't dead, simply quiet ] On 1/28/23 05:35, Peter Humphrey wrote: > I'm actually the one who first heard that the original maintainer had died.  > I had

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] waf-utils.eclass: enable parallel install

2023-01-28 Thread Mike Gilbert
This gives a nice speedup to net-fs/samba, which (re)links several hundred files in its install phase. Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/715542 Signed-off-by: Mike Gilbert --- eclass/waf-utils.eclass | 7 --- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/waf-utils.eclass

Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-python/ package naming policy?

2023-01-28 Thread Michał Górny
On Sat, 2023-01-28 at 22:15 +0500, Anna (cybertailor) Vyalkova wrote: > I'd prefer if PyPI names are guidelines, not a strict policy. I don't > like CamelCase and separators other than dash ("-") :P > > Also I don't like when packages are named "dev-python/python-foo" > instead of just

[gentoo-dev] Various packages up for grabs (avahi, curl, fcron, tor...)

2023-01-28 Thread Michał Górny
Hi, Per blueness' request, some of his packages are now looking for a new maintainer. The affected packages are: acct-group/at acct-group/avahi acct-group/avahi-autoipd acct-group/axtls acct-group/bitflu acct-group/cron acct-group/fcron acct-group/monkeyd acct-group/netdev acct-group/stubby

Re: [gentoo-dev] Various packages up for grabs (avahi, curl, fcron, tor...)

2023-01-28 Thread Michał Górny
On Sat, 2023-01-28 at 21:18 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > On Sat, 2023-01-28 at 21:11 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Per blueness' request, some of his packages are now looking for a new > > maintainer. The affected packages are: > > > > Also packages that were left without a proxy:

Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-python/ package naming policy?

2023-01-28 Thread Florian Schmaus
On 28/01/2023 17.38, Michał Górny wrote: To improve consistency and make packages easier to find, I'd like to propose going forward that when packages are published on PyPI, we use their official PyPI names. This also means preserving the case for the few packages that use CamelCase names and