-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
| Another useflag-related question.
|
| Currently, the encode useflag is defined as follow:
|
| encode - Adds support for MEncoder or LaME encoder, wherever applicable
|
| this is a loose definition which is quite useles
--
Mike Doty
Gentoo/AMD64 Operational Co-Lead
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG key - 0xA797C7A7
GPG fingerprint: 0094 7F06 913E 78D6 F1BB
06BA D0AD D125 A797 C7A7
--- Begin Message ---
Enjoy it! ;)
May 14 18:00:45 * ferringb|afk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) has joined #gentoo-amd64-dev
May 14 18:00
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I've done a new version of profuse, the 0.21.0. Profuse is a use flag
editor, meant to replace ufed. Profuse contains a newt and ncurses
interface as well as a gtk2 GUI. You can launch it with '--ufed' if you
are feeling lost.
I would appreciate
On Sat, 14 May 2005 13:21:55 +0200 Francesco Riosa
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| ciaranm, would you commit it ?
Only if you comment on the bug with the results of the extensive testing
you've done to make sure that I haven't missed anything.
--
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools
On Saturday 14 May 2005 20:06, Michael Cummings wrote:
> Anyone want to take this bug?
I'm not sure if portage is the right place for those things as they are
strictly bound to the provider used.
Anyway I think you should look at least to italian devs (but I take myself out
as I'm not using that
And this one:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92123
On Saturday 14 May 2005 02:06 pm, Michael Cummings wrote:
> I had to google sms before I could even figure out if this was something I
> might be interested in supporting. We got a bug assigned to perl,
> presumably because that's what it
I had to google sms before I could even figure out if this was something I
might be interested in supporting. We got a bug assigned to perl, presumably
because that's what it's wrriten in, for a little script that lets you handle
sms shtuff. i could certify whether the deps are met correctly and
Stroller wrote:
* Unique ID strings for packages, zynot style. Messy as hell though,
DEPEND="foo/bar {12379812AD7382164BD87678652438FC65E43A2}" doesn't have
the same kind of ring to it...
[snip]
> I'm going to ignore that. This thread started because the current
> category/name namin
R Hill wrote:
> the only thing i know of that needs LT is Xen, and they're already
> working on NPTL support.
IIRC, Xen has problems with Thread Local Storage. They have created some
workaround, but it was very slow and buggy, and so they decided not to
use NPTL (not sure about the last point).
S
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>Is there a standard way of handling testing for utility-type eclasses?
>For versionator I currently have a __versionator__test_blah function
>included in the eclass (source versionator.eclass works, it doesn't have
>any portage-specific code), but this is going to get a bit
10 matches
Mail list logo
