-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ned Ludd wrote:
| On Sun, 2005-11-20 at 14:45 -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
|Our policy for X is that if upstream won't accept it, we won't either.
|Perhaps you'd be interested in adopting that and convincing the reported
|to get upstream interested?
Stuart Herbert wrote:
I've just masked the package 'www-apps/phpgroupware', and will be
dropping it from the tree soon. There are a number of issues with the
project, including:
* Outstanding security bugs
* Upstream homepage no longer available
* No real releases in over a year
FYI, I
On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 02:45:41PM -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Our policy for X is that if upstream won't accept it, we won't either.
Perhaps you'd be interested in adopting that and convincing the reported
to get upstream interested?
The mobile herd has the same policy. Of course, simple
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 08:35:35AM +0200, Alin Nastac wrote:
The new ppp ebuild should erase /etc/conf.d/net.ppp0 and
/etc/init.d/net.ppp0 installed by previous versions of net-dialup/ppp.
The upcoming sys-apps/baselayout-1.12.0_pre11 will be able to handle any
kind of PPP links.
What would
On Friday 18 November 2005 18:09, Homer Parker wrote:
Now that GLEP 41 (AT/HT) has passed, we need to designate a subdomain
for their email. This will cover AT/HT's as well as forum help, so needs
to be generic. So to start with let me throw a couple out:
@staff.g.o
@assist.g.o
On Monday 21 November 2005 09:39, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Ned Ludd wrote:
| On Sun, 2005-11-20 at 14:45 -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
|Our policy for X is that if upstream won't accept it, we won't either.
|Perhaps you'd be interested in adopting that and convincing the reported
|to get
Curtis Napier posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on
Mon, 21 Nov 2005 02:18:21 -0500:
http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org
Also, I only use GNU/Linux and I have only tested on the following
browsers:
Mozilla-1.7
firefox-1.0
Opera-8.5
Internet Explorer-6 under CrossOver Office
Alin Nastac wrote:
Hi gang,
The new ppp ebuild should erase /etc/conf.d/net.ppp0 and
/etc/init.d/net.ppp0 installed by previous versions of net-dialup/ppp.
The upcoming sys-apps/baselayout-1.12.0_pre11 will be able to handle any
kind of PPP links.
What would be the best way of doing
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 02:18:21AM -0500, Curtis Napier wrote:
If you have access to a Macintosh, Windows, *BSD or any other OS or
Browser please test the site and include your OS and the browser version
in your feedback. I haven't received feedback from Konqueror or Safari
so feedback from
Ciaran McCreesh posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
below, on Sun, 20 Nov 2005 14:57:49 +:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2005 07:49:11 -0700 Lares Moreau
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On Sun, 2005-11-20 at 04:29 -0700, Duncan wrote:
| If the capacity is there, go RAID6 (dual parity RAID5, so two
|
On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 02:18:21 -0500
Curtis Napier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm asking for everyone (developers and users alike) to please
have a look at the updated site and send any feedback you may
have.
Firefox-1.0.7 here, on a 1024x768 screen, and i think there is too
much wasted space.
Good job!
Shows nice on Firefox 1.0.7, Opera 8.5 and Konqueror 3.4.1!
I don't know if you are accepting suggestions, but I have a few usability ones:
- The top blue bar(s) is too much big. In a 1024x768 screen it takes
almost half the showing page. Maybe decreasing the size of the second
bar
21.11.2005, 13:23:29, Herbert G. Fischer wrote:
Good job!
- The bottom menus are very nice but I think they are in the wrong place.
The natural human being will search for all the site menu items on the top or
first page (without scrolling). The rule in this case is to put all menu
items
R Hill wrote:
Daniel Ahlberg wrote:
* if ebuild installs COPYING and/or INSTALL into doc.
Is this actually important? There are a hell of a lot of ebuilds that fail
under this rule. I'd like to start filing patches for some of the packages in
this list so I'm interested in knowing
051121 Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote:
I would rather see something about system customization in general,
not only CFLAGS but also USE flag et al, which is much more interresting.
Something like Get Gentoo and make your own « sur mesure » system,
but i don't know how to translate sur
Hi,
I'm looking forward to use Bacula 1.38.1 that was released last week
but not even 1.38.0 that was released 31 october 2005 has an ebuild
yet. There is some problem with it? It's abandoned?
Please let me know if you need help on this ebuild. I don't know how to
create an ebuild and include it
Firefox-1.0.7 here, on a 1024x768 screen, and i think there is too
much wasted space. Since i'm not new to Gentoo, when i go to the
front page it's either to follow link to the doc or to read news.
The former is fine, but the later is not (news are the last ~10% of
what i see):
21.11.2005, 14:22:39, Herbert G. Fischer wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking forward to use Bacula 1.38.1 that was released last week but
not even 1.38.0 that was released 31 october 2005 has an ebuild yet. There is
some problem with it? It's abandoned?
Please let me know if you need help on this
Curtis Napier пишет:
If you have access to a Macintosh, Windows, *BSD or any other OS or
Browser please test the site and include your OS and the browser
version in your feedback. I haven't received feedback from Konqueror
or Safari so feedback from those browsers would be much appreciated.
Lance Albertson wrote:
Curtis Napier wrote:
If you have access to a Macintosh, Windows, *BSD or any other OS or
Browser please test the site and include your OS and the browser version
in your feedback. I haven't received feedback from Konqueror or Safari
so feedback from those browsers
On Monday 21 November 2005 14:24, Gim wrote:
Seems like the amount of wasted space grows when fonts size is _reduced_.
I'm no sure why/how such a thing is possible, but for sure it's something
that has to be fixed in order to obtain suitable layouts for a wider set
of firefox settings.
I think
Lance Albertson wrote:
Curtis Napier wrote:
If you have access to a Macintosh, Windows, *BSD or any other OS or
Browser please test the site and include your OS and the browser version
in your feedback. I haven't received feedback from Konqueror or Safari
so feedback from those browsers would
I have the same consern. I use a TFT-display (Dell 2005FPW) that has a
quite bright back light which might be the cause of the light colors
being hard to read.
Petteri,
I have that same display. I turn the brightness down to 40%, since
it's way too bright at the default 100%.
Cheers,
Aaron
- the 'about' blurb has way too much vertical spacing == wasted
- the ad bar on the left should be thrown behind a purple bar like the
current site does ... it helps the user visually tune the space out as
crap they can safely ignore (at least it helps me)
- can we cut out the ads alogether for
This feature should only be used for things that are directly related
to the tree, and will cause mass breakage if ignored.I
fully agree with this statement. I am behind the adoption of the
GLEP only if it does what (I originally believed) was its purpose...to
get CRITICAL news regarding package
On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 14:09:55 +
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- the bar at the top which blathers on about what Gentoo has to
offer i could do without completely (imo, you can read the About
page)
What about keeping it on front page only? (with the vertical size
issue fixed sure)
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 03:49:42PM +0100, Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 14:09:55 +
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- the bar at the top which blathers on about what Gentoo has to
offer i could do without completely (imo, you can read the About
page)
On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 07:49 -0500, Philip Webb wrote:
051121 Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote:
I would rather see something about system customization in general,
not only CFLAGS but also USE flag et al, which is much more interresting.
Something like Get Gentoo and make your own « sur
Vapier wrote: [Mon Nov 21 2005, 08:09:55AM CST]
- wheres the ufo guy [2] ? at least hide him in the bottom left
corner of the page ... it'd keep with the mysterious nature of the
fellow
[2] http://www.gentoo.org/images/gridtest.gif
Drobbins wanted to hang on to Znurt when he left. You're
Aaron Kulbe wrote:
I have the same consern. I use a TFT-display (Dell 2005FPW) that has a
quite bright back light which might be the cause of the light colors
being hard to read.
Petteri,
I have that same display. I turn the brightness down to 40%, since
it's way too bright at the
I don't know if the contents are supposed to be the 'live' website data,
but, after scrolling down to the nice link tables at the bottom,
clicking on GLEPs, the info is outdated. Only up to GLEP 38.
Don't know if that is what you are looking for?
Later Days
--
Lares Moreau [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
On Monday 21 of November 2005 16:08 Lares Moreau wrote:
I don't know if the contents are supposed to be the 'live' website data,
but, after scrolling down to the nice link tables at the bottom,
clicking on GLEPs, the info is outdated. Only up to GLEP 38.
Don't know if that is what you are
On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 14:09:55 + Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| - the 'gentoo' text in the upper left of the page should use the cool
| red bubble letters [1] ... or at least drop the infinity sign ...
| yeah, the infinity sign is cool, but since it is in such a 'high
| profile'
After realplayer the last week, also helixplayer is pending removal from the
tree.
HelixPlayer, opensource player developed by Real and somewhat similar to
RealPlayer has a bad history of security vulnerabilities and it's still
vulnerable to a security issue (1.0.6 is out but still missing an
Mint Shows wrote:
This feature should only be used for things that are directly related
to the tree, and will cause mass breakage if ignored.
I fully agree with this statement. I am behind the adoption of the
GLEP only if it does what (I originally believed) was its purpose...to
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 08:29:03PM +0100, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
After realplayer the last week, also helixplayer is pending removal from the
tree.
Please make a habit of always supplying a list of
alternates/replacements when writing a last rites email - saves us
someone having to
On Mon, 2005-21-11 at 02:18 -0500, Curtis Napier wrote:
I'm asking for everyone (developers and users alike) to please have a
look at the updated site and send any feedback you may have. I'm
especially interested in feedback from anyone who uses accessibilty
programs such as screen readers
On Monday 21 November 2005 21:15, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
Please make a habit of always supplying a list of
alternates/replacements when writing a last rites email - saves us
someone having to ask:
Sorry, too used to know the media-video category by heart :|
What replaces it?
HelixPlayer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Because portage treats the default virtual differently than I was
previously led to believe, everybody who's ported a package to modular X
so far will need to make a small change.
It's really easy, but it might take a bit of time to go through your
On Monday 21 November 2005 21:50, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Here's the change:
virtual/x11 - =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.99
Is this the last change? :)
Just to make sure, I received the broken pieces of the old method, so I
don't really want to take them from the new one, too ;)
--
Diego
On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 15:35 -0500, A. Khattri wrote:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2005, Mike Frysinger wrote:
- the 'gentoo' text in the upper left of the page should use the cool
red bubble letters [1]
Never liked the red lettering - very dated.
I thought that Daniel was taking the red bubble
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
| On Monday 21 November 2005 21:50, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
|
|Here's the change:
|virtual/x11 - =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.99
|
| Is this the last change? :)
| Just to make sure, I received the broken pieces of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
21.11.2005, 20:16:47, Renat Golubchyk wrote:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 01:37:00 -0600 Lance Albertson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Variable names and commands are bright blue in the old docs. The new
color is darker and that does not improve readability
On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 21:43 +0100, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
On Monday 21 November 2005 21:15, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
Please make a habit of always supplying a list of
alternates/replacements when writing a last rites email - saves us
someone having to ask:
Sorry, too used to
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
The infinity design makes us look like a bunch of ricers. Kill it!
+1
--
Luca Barbato
Gentoo/linux Developer Gentoo/PPC Operational Leader
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Curtis Napier wrote:
This has been cross posted to gentoo-dev and www-redesign.
make the purple bar with portage and the other feature disappear or at
least 1/2 tall.
Put the Community, Resource, Documentation either on the left in a pane
or on the top.
the sponsor pane should retain the
On Monday 21 November 2005 18:24, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
The infinity design makes us look like a bunch of ricers. Kill it!
+1
not like I love the red letters... (the 'g' actually makes it similar to
G/FBSD logo, never noted that before)...
--
Diego Flameeyes Pettenò -
Curtis Napier wrote:
I'm especially interested in feedback from anyone who uses
accessibilty programs such as screen readers or if you are color
blind or have any other accessibilty issues.
Not being blind or otherwise visually handicapped, but I use rather
large letters (18 pixels), do not
Hi,
This is an automatically created email message.
http://gentoo.tamperd.net/stable has just been updated with 14544 ebuilds.
The page shows results from a number of tests that are run against the ebuilds.
The tests are:
* if a version has been masked for 30 days or more.
* if an arch was in
I have to say I'm somewhat disappointed by what I see compared to Aarons
proposed look¹.
a) Regarding the space below the two horizontal menus: A continuous image
looks much better than these cells with a lot of useless and redundant
links above them. If you think the space is wasted - well
It's interesting to compare http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org/ with
http://www.aaronshi.com/gentoo/mainindex.html. One of the things that I
always liked about the original design was the fact that the front page
held a considerable amount of information without needing much vertical
scrolling. On
On Monday 21 November 2005 01:07 pm, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
I thought that Daniel was taking the red bubble letters. I also
remember the discussion about the infinity logo way back then and the
decision was made to keep it. For one, it is very easy to print,
I thought that the vote was for
- Where is the Search for __ in section __ field ? I would expect it
somewhere on the top. See http://php.net for a good and tiny one.
- I like the infinity sign. It looks cool and professionel (not too commercial).
- I don't like the big, purple bar (portage, packages, get gentoo,
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 06:14:15PM -0600, Grant Goodyear wrote:
One of the things that I always liked about the original design was
the fact that the front page held a considerable amount of
information without needing much vertical scrolling.
on that note, here is another opinion of mine that
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 01:53:01AM +0100, Ingo Bormuth wrote:
- Where is the Search for __ in section __ field ? I would expect it
somewhere on the top. See http://php.net for a good and tiny one.
ah, excellent idea ... we get people who ask for this from time to time
in bugzilla
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 01:11:14 +
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 01:53:01AM +0100, Ingo Bormuth wrote:
- Where is the Search for __ in section __ field ? I
would expect it somewhere on the top. See http://php.net for a
good and tiny one.
ah,
maillog: 22/11/2005-12:05:38(+0900): Георги Георгиев types
input type=text name=as_q/
input type=hidden name=as_sitesearch name=gentoo.org/
That ought to be
input type=hidden name=as_sitesearch value=gentoo.org/
of course.
--
(* Georgi Georgiev (* Mr and Mrs PED, can I borrow 26.7% of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Carsten Lohrke wrote:
| On Monday 21 November 2005 21:50, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
|
|Here's the change:
| virtual/x11 - =x11-base/xorg-x11-6.99
|
|
| virtual/x11 isn't xorg for all profiles.
Perhaps the relevant people (macos?) could get in touch
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
It may be that we'll need to add x11-base/apple-xfree into the || list
If the list keeps growing maybe we should consider a GLEP 37-style
solution, like was suggested by Jason. It would allow us to make any
further changes that are required (agreed, hopefully none)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello all,
it has taken a while but better late then never. Some off you might
have seen a dude called nichoj around, well he's a brand new java herd
member.
He has been working hard before and still continues to amaze the java
herd.
He's a US
capitalista wrote:
The file grouping would be excellent in the sense that you could tar
up a directory and make it available for others people to use, and all
you would need to do is extract it to /etc/portage/includes.
Does it often make sense to group a set of package.* files together?
On 11/21/05, Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does it often make sense to group a set of package.* files together? Can you
provide one or more examples of how this is useful?
Sure, and I'll use KDE yet again for one example. In fact, this would
have come in handy recently. When the 3.5
On Mon, 2005-21-11 at 20:47 -0800, Brian wrote:
It seems that all the recent patches in portage may have affected the
ability to get info reliably from packages in the overlay. At least for
porthole.
I've done some more debugging and found that the portage code does not
always return versions
63 matches
Mail list logo
