Hi all,
because of bug #122956 I am going to remove this package from the tree if
nobody objects. Whoever objects should perhaps just take over
maintainership and fix this bug.
Bye, Patrick
pgpTH5ySxhP88.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Typical example:
DESCRIPTION="I am a fish"
inherit eutils
End result:
DESCRIPTION="Based on the eutils eclass"
Some eclasses set DESCRIPTION. This is one of the many reasons that
inherit should go as early up the ebuild as possible.
List, which may be utterly wrong, of packages th
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 01:14:39 +0100
Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/9e/DoNotFeedTroll.jpg
Err, what?
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
17.2.2006, 0:42:13, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> (ommited)
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/9e/DoNotFeedTroll.jpg
Everyone else, sorry that you had to read this debate... :/
--
jakub
pgpDXBRuHXpDD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Jakub Moc wrote: [Thu Feb 16 2006 - 06:34:32PM EST]
> 17.2.2006, 0:23:49, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 00:14:42 +0100 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > | What are you talking about? commonbox is listed as maintainer of that
> > | stuff, it's been broken for years, you neith
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 00:34:32 +0100 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > You should probably go and read herds.xml sometime.
|
| Or maybe you should, rather...
I said to go and read herds.xml. I'm not going to bother carrying on
with this if you won't even do that properly.
--
Ciaran McCrees
17.2.2006, 0:23:49, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 00:14:42 +0100 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | 16.2.2006, 23:58:41, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> |
> | What are you talking about? commonbox is listed as maintainer of that
> | stuff, it's been broken for years, you neither f
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 00:14:42 +0100 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| 16.2.2006, 23:58:41, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| > On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 23:45:45 +0100 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > wrote:
| > | OMG, stop this crap and don't waste our time. You specifically
| > | asked me to do it -
| > |
16.2.2006, 23:58:41, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 23:45:45 +0100 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | OMG, stop this crap and don't waste our time. You specifically asked
> | me to do it - http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20201#c11
> No, I asked you to do it properly, n
Jakub Moc wrote: [Thu Feb 16 2006, 03:32:13PM CST]
>
> 16.2.2006, 22:05:54, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:51:40 +0100 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > | Unless someone picks this up, it should be package.masked and
> > | removed from portage. There are tons of better
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 23:45:45 +0100 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| OMG, stop this crap and don't waste our time. You specifically asked
| me to do it - http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20201#c11
No, I asked you to do it properly, not to send out one last rites email
for something you'
16.2.2006, 23:08:51, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:55:33 +0100 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | 16.2.2006, 22:47:49, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| >> On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:32:13 +0100 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| >> wrote:
| >> | BTW, x11-misc/bbapm is about one month
| >
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:55:33 +0100 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| 16.2.2006, 22:47:49, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| > On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:32:13 +0100 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > wrote:
| > | BTW, x11-misc/bbapm is about one month
| > | overdue (http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20
16.2.2006, 22:47:49, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:32:13 +0100 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | BTW, x11-misc/bbapm is about one month
> | overdue (http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20201)
> It's not overdue. It hasn't had a proper last rites email sent out yet
> a
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:32:13 +0100 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| BTW, x11-misc/bbapm is about one month
| overdue (http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20201)
It's not overdue. It hasn't had a proper last rites email sent out yet
and probably won't get one either, given the flamefest th
16.2.2006, 22:05:54, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:51:40 +0100 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | Unless someone picks this up, it should be package.masked and
> | removed from portage. There are tons of better and working
> | alternatives.
> Uh, it's not a last rites unl
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:51:40 +0100 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Unless someone picks this up, it should be package.masked and
| removed from portage. There are tons of better and working
| alternatives.
Uh, it's not a last rites unless someone actually does the masking
pending removal.
app-editors/gnotepad+ is a simple HTML and text editor. It lacks a
maintainer, doesn't compile and last release upstream was 5+ years ago.
Unless someone picks this up, it should be package.masked and removed from
portage. There are tons of better and working alternatives.
https://bugs.gentoo.org/
The package has been in package.mask since July 2002. Upstream appears dead.
If no one objects, I will drop it from the tree in a week (since it has
already been masked for years anyway :) ).
--
Mark Loeser - Gentoo Developer (cpp gcc-porting qa toolchain x86)
email - halcy0n AT ge
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 18:03 +0100, Edgar Hucek wrote:
>> For your intresst. Last week i bought a new toy.
>> One of those shiny new Intel iMac's. I search the
>> net if someone is trying to get linux on it. I saw
>
> You apparently missed our own bugzilla[1][2].
Mea cupl
Yup, I'm a retard. Forgot to post the links.
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120340
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120341
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead
x86 Architecture Team
Games - Developer
Gentoo Linux
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 18:03 +0100, Edgar Hucek wrote:
> For your intresst. Last week i bought a new toy.
> One of those shiny new Intel iMac's. I search the
> net if someone is trying to get linux on it. I saw
You apparently missed our own bugzilla[1][2].
> only most people only wanna tu run wind
For your intresst. Last week i bought a new toy.
One of those shiny new Intel iMac's. I search the
net if someone is trying to get linux on it. I saw
only most people only wanna tu run windows on it *gah*.
So i started a little research. At the moment i have
Gentoo Linux running on it on an externa
On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 02:50 -0700, Duncan wrote:
>
> What I'd do with such bugs is thank the user, but say next time, please
> give me a few days, at least a week (or whatever a dev feels comfortable
> with for that package, again, it'll vary) -- if it's /just/ a bump
> request. If I take over a
The last change: 260 to 232, over 3 days -- that's 10 packages a day,
which is reasonable. Good job, to whoever's been fixing games! Again,
dropped by more than 10.
Progress graph:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyderous/broken_modular/broken_modular_progress.png
Latest list:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyd
25 matches
Mail list logo
